Logotipo do repositório
 

Publicação:
On-farm culling methods used for pigs

dc.contributor.authorDalla Costa, F. A. [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorGibson, T. J.
dc.contributor.authorOliveira, S. E.O. [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorGregory, N. G.
dc.contributor.authorFaucitano, L.
dc.contributor.authorDalla Costa, O. A.
dc.contributor.institutionMSD Animal Health
dc.contributor.institutionUniversidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
dc.contributor.institutionMANEJA
dc.contributor.institutionUniversity of London
dc.contributor.institutionAgriculture and Agri-Food Canada
dc.contributor.institutionEmpresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária (EMBRAPA)
dc.date.accessioned2022-04-29T08:36:38Z
dc.date.available2022-04-29T08:36:38Z
dc.date.issued2021-11-01
dc.description.abstractThe culling of injured and non-viable pigs (Sus scrofa) (neonate to breeding stock) is a routine and necessary procedure on most farms. Usually, pigs are culled using one of the following methods: blunt-force trauma (manual and mechanical), captive-bolt stunners, electrical stunning and electrocution or carbon dioxide. Manual blunt-force trauma is one of the most widely used methods due to its low or absent operational and investment costs. However, as a method, it has serious limitations, which include the risk of incomplete concussion, pain, and distress. Manual blunt-force trauma is also aesthetically unpleasant to operators and wider society.To address these issues there has been significant recent research into the development of alternatives to manual blunt-force trauma, these include: captive-bolt stunners, on-farm, gas-based controlled atmosphere systems, low atmospheric pressure systems and electrical stunning. Some of these are currently in commercial use while others are still in the developmental phase.This review brings together the relevant research in this field, evaluating the methods in terms of mechanism of action (mechanical and physiological), effectiveness and animal welfare.en
dc.description.affiliationMSD Animal Health Department of Strategy and Innovation, Av Dr Chicri Zaidan, 296, SP
dc.description.affiliationPrograma de Pós-Graduação em Zootecnia Faculdade de Ciências Agrárias e Veterinárias Universidade Estadual Paulista, SP
dc.description.affiliationManeja Bem-Estar Animal MANEJA MANEJA, SC
dc.description.affiliationRoyal Veterinary College University of London, Hawkshead Lane
dc.description.affiliationAgriculture and Agri-Food Canada, 2000 College Street
dc.description.affiliationEmbrapa Swine and Poultry, BR 153, Km 110
dc.description.affiliationUnespPrograma de Pós-Graduação em Zootecnia Faculdade de Ciências Agrárias e Veterinárias Universidade Estadual Paulista, SP
dc.description.sponsorshipUniversidade Estadual Paulista
dc.format.extent507-522
dc.identifierhttp://dx.doi.org/10.7120/09627286.30.3.008
dc.identifier.citationAnimal Welfare, v. 30, n. 4, p. 507-522, 2021.
dc.identifier.doi10.7120/09627286.30.3.008
dc.identifier.issn0962-7286
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85119384147
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11449/229911
dc.language.isoeng
dc.relation.ispartofAnimal Welfare
dc.sourceScopus
dc.subjectAnimal welfare
dc.subjectCulling
dc.subjectKilling
dc.subjectNeonate
dc.subjectPig
dc.subjectSuffering
dc.titleOn-farm culling methods used for pigsen
dc.typeResenha
dspace.entity.typePublication
unesp.departmentZootecnia - FCAVpt

Arquivos