Logotipo do repositório
 

Publicação:
Comparison of in vitro and in vivo fertilizing potential of bovine semen frozen in egg yolk or new lecithin based extenders

dc.contributor.authorCrespilho, A. M.
dc.contributor.authorSa Filho, M. F.
dc.contributor.authorDell'aqua Junior, José Antônio [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorNichi, M.
dc.contributor.authorMonteiro, G. A. [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorAvanzi, B. R. [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorMartins, A. [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorPapa, Frederico Ozanam [UNESP]
dc.contributor.institutionUniversidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)
dc.contributor.institutionUniv Santo Amaro
dc.contributor.institutionUniversidade de São Paulo (USP)
dc.date.accessioned2013-09-30T18:25:28Z
dc.date.accessioned2014-05-20T13:41:58Z
dc.date.available2013-09-30T18:25:28Z
dc.date.available2014-05-20T13:41:58Z
dc.date.issued2012-11-01
dc.description.abstractOne of the main factors known to influence quality and fertility of bovine cryopreserved semen is the extender used. In this matter, a great worldwide interest has been directed to the development of chemically defined media, free of animal origin products. The objective of the present study was to compare the efficacy of three bovine semen extenders: Iris-fructose (IRIS, control with 20% egg yolk), Botu-Bov (R) (BB; 20% egg yolk), and Botu-Bov (R)-soy lecithin (BB-L; 1% soy lecithin). Towards this aim, post-thaw computer assisted sperm analysis (CASA), sperm membrane and acrosome integrity were evaluated (Experiment 1). Additionally, cryopreserved samples were used in a fixed time artificial insemination program aiming to evaluate in vivo fertility (pregnancy per insemination-P/AI; Experiment 2). Despite the higher straightness and linearity found for samples cryopreserved in BB and BB-L when compared to those cryopreserved in IRIS, egg yolk based extenders provided higher total and progressive motilities, percentage of rapid sperms and intact membrane cells (P < 0.05). Furthermore, P/IA was higher in samples cryopreserved in egg yolk based extenders when compared to soy lecithin [TRIS=59.26(a) (64/108), BB=62.37(a) (58/93), and BB-L=36.45(b) (35/96)]. Although soy lecithin represents an alternative for the development of chemically defined extenders with decreased risk of biological contamination, egg yolk based extenders are more efficient on the preservation of bovine post-thaw sperm viability and fertility. (C) 2012 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.en
dc.description.affiliationSão Paulo State Univ, Dept Anim Reprod & Vet Radiol, Botucatu, SP, Brazil
dc.description.affiliationUniv Santo Amaro, UNISA, Sch Vet Med, São Paulo, Brazil
dc.description.affiliationUniv São Paulo, Dept Anim Reprod, São Paulo, Brazil
dc.description.affiliationSão Paulo State Univ, Dept Clin Surg & Anim Reprod, Aracatuba, SP, Brazil
dc.description.affiliationUnespSão Paulo State Univ, Dept Anim Reprod & Vet Radiol, Botucatu, SP, Brazil
dc.description.affiliationUnespSão Paulo State Univ, Dept Clin Surg & Anim Reprod, Aracatuba, SP, Brazil
dc.description.sponsorshipFundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo (FAPESP)
dc.description.sponsorshipIdFAPESP: 06/61153-5
dc.format.extent01/jun
dc.identifierhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.livsci.2012.05.011
dc.identifier.citationLivestock Science. Amsterdam: Elsevier B.V., v. 149, n. 1-2, p. 1-6, 2012.
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.livsci.2012.05.011
dc.identifier.fileWOS000309793700001.pdf
dc.identifier.issn1871-1413
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11449/14560
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000309793700001
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherElsevier B.V.
dc.relation.ispartofLivestock Science
dc.relation.ispartofjcr1.204
dc.relation.ispartofsjr0,730
dc.rights.accessRightsAcesso aberto
dc.sourceWeb of Science
dc.subjectBull semenen
dc.subjectSemen extenderen
dc.subjectEgg yolken
dc.subjectSoy lecithinen
dc.subjectCryopreservationen
dc.subjectArtificial inseminationen
dc.titleComparison of in vitro and in vivo fertilizing potential of bovine semen frozen in egg yolk or new lecithin based extendersen
dc.typeArtigo
dcterms.licensehttp://www.elsevier.com/about/open-access/open-access-policies/article-posting-policy
dcterms.rightsHolderElsevier B.V.
dspace.entity.typePublication
unesp.author.lattes0640158639112242
unesp.campusUniversidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP), Faculdade de Medicina Veterinária, Araçatubapt
unesp.campusUniversidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP), Faculdade de Medicina Veterinária e Zootecnia, Botucatupt
unesp.departmentClínica, Cirurgia e Reprodução Animal - FMVApt
unesp.departmentReprodução Animal e Radiologia Veterinária - FMVZpt

Arquivos

Pacote Original

Agora exibindo 1 - 1 de 1
Carregando...
Imagem de Miniatura
Nome:
WOS000309793700001.pdf
Tamanho:
182.94 KB
Formato:
Adobe Portable Document Format

Licença do Pacote

Agora exibindo 1 - 2 de 2
Carregando...
Imagem de Miniatura
Nome:
license.txt
Tamanho:
1.71 KB
Formato:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Descrição:
Carregando...
Imagem de Miniatura
Nome:
license.txt
Tamanho:
1.71 KB
Formato:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Descrição: