Logotipo do repositório
 

Publicação:
Economic comparison between conventional aquaponics and FLOCponics systems

dc.contributor.authorPinho, Sara M. [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorFlores, Roberto Manolio Valladão
dc.contributor.authorDavid, Luiz H. [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorEmerenciano, Maurício G.C.
dc.contributor.authorQuagrainie, Kwamena K.
dc.contributor.authorPortella, Maria Célia [UNESP]
dc.contributor.institutionUniversidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
dc.contributor.institutionEmpresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária (EMBRAPA)
dc.contributor.institutionSanta Catarina State University (UDESC)
dc.contributor.institutionPurdue University
dc.contributor.institutionChapecó
dc.date.accessioned2022-04-29T08:39:19Z
dc.date.available2022-04-29T08:39:19Z
dc.date.issued2022-04-15
dc.description.abstractBiofloc-based fish production involves a dense microbial co-culture that supports nutrient cycling, generally reducing the amount of feed utilized and the need for mechanic and biological filters. These technical benefits of biofloc technology can lower the costs compared to traditional intensive techniques such as recirculating aquaculture systems (RAS). The RAS is conventionally adopted to integrated fish-plant production in aquaponics systems, and recent studies demonstrated the potential for integrating biofloc technology and hydroponics production in FLOCponics systems. The present study compared the economic viability for integrated agri-aquaculture production of tilapia juveniles and lettuce in FLOCponics (FP) and conventional aquaponics (AP) systems. The study was developed as an investment analysis for the commercial production of tilapia juveniles and lettuce in Brazil under four different scenarios. Two scenarios considered previous experimental results of marketable lettuce in both systems, i.e., 37% of total lettuce production would be marketable in FP (scenario 1) and 98% marketable lettuce in AP (scenario 2). The other two scenarios (using FP and AP systems) considered a hypothetical production in which all the lettuce produced have the marketable quality (scenario 3 and 4, respectively). The economic viability indicators calculated were: Internal Rate of Return (IRR); Net Present Value (NPV); PayBack (PB); Discounted PayBack (DPB); Benefit/Cost ratio (B/C) and Discounted Benefit/Cost ratio (DB/DC). The results showed that the production of Nile tilapia juveniles and lettuce in AP (scenario 2) is profitable, but the 37% marketable lettuce from FP (scenario 1) is not. Both hypothetical scenarios 3 and 4 were identified as profitable. A break-even point was calculated in scenario 1 (FP) to assess the quantities of plants that should be visually suitable for marketing to make such an investment project economically profitable. It was estimated that 68.7% of the lettuces produced should have desirable visual marketable characteristics to make FP feasible. The results show that investing in research to evaluate a multi-cycle production to prove the stability of long-term FLOCponics projects is highly recommended since the financial analysis indicates that FLOCponics could be financially feasible.en
dc.description.affiliationUniversidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp) Centro de Aquicultura da Unesp, Via de acesso Prof. Paulo Donato Castellane, s/n
dc.description.affiliationEmbrapa Pesca e Aquicultura Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuaria
dc.description.affiliationAquaculture Laboratory (LAQ) Santa Catarina State University (UDESC)
dc.description.affiliationDepartment of Agricultural Economics Purdue University, West Lafayette
dc.description.affiliationGraduate Program in Animal Science (PPGZOO/UDESC) Chapecó
dc.description.affiliationUnespUniversidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp) Centro de Aquicultura da Unesp, Via de acesso Prof. Paulo Donato Castellane, s/n
dc.description.sponsorshipConselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (CNPq)
dc.description.sponsorshipFundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo (FAPESP)
dc.description.sponsorshipIdFAPESP: #2016/14966-2
dc.description.sponsorshipIdFAPESP: 2016/14966-2
dc.identifierhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.aquaculture.2022.737987
dc.identifier.citationAquaculture, v. 552.
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.aquaculture.2022.737987
dc.identifier.issn0044-8486
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85123887999
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11449/230323
dc.language.isoeng
dc.relation.ispartofAquaculture
dc.sourceScopus
dc.subjectAgri-aquaculture production
dc.subjectBioflocs
dc.subjectBreak-even point
dc.subjectInvestment
dc.subjecttilapia
dc.titleEconomic comparison between conventional aquaponics and FLOCponics systemsen
dc.typeArtigo
dspace.entity.typePublication

Arquivos