Logotipo do repositório
 

Publicação:
Influence of the foundation substrate on the fatigue behavior of bonded glass, zirconia polycrystals, and polymer infiltrated ceramic simplified CAD-CAM restorations

dc.contributor.authorMachry, Renan Vaz
dc.contributor.authorBorges, Alexandre Luiz Souto [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorPereira, Gabriel Kalil Rocha
dc.contributor.authorKleverlaan, Cornelis Johannes
dc.contributor.authorVenturini, Andressa Borin
dc.contributor.authorValandro, Luiz Felipe
dc.contributor.institutionFederal University of Santa Maria
dc.contributor.institutionUniversidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)
dc.contributor.institutionUniversiteit van Amsterdam and Vrije Universiteit
dc.date.accessioned2021-06-25T10:53:08Z
dc.date.available2021-06-25T10:53:08Z
dc.date.issued2021-05-01
dc.description.abstractThis study evaluated the influence of distinct substrates on the mechanical fatigue behavior of adhesively cemented simplified restorations made of glass, polycrystalline or polymer infiltrated-ceramics. CAD/CAM ceramic blocks (feldspathic – FEL; lithium disilicate – LD; yttria-stabilized zirconia – YZ; and polymer-infiltrated ceramic network – PICN) were shaped into discs (n = 15, Ø = 10 mm; thickness = 1.0 mm), mimicking a simplified monolithic restoration. After, they were adhesively cemented onto different foundation substrates (epoxy resin – ER; or Ni–Cr metal alloy – MA) of the same shape (Ø = 10 mm; thickness = 2.0 mm). The assemblies were subjected to fatigue testing using a step-stress approach (200N-2800 N; step-size of 200 N; 10,000 cycles per step; 20 Hz) upon the occurrence of a radial crack or fracture. The data was submitted to two-way ANOVA (α = 0.05) to analyze differences considering ‘ceramic material’ and ‘type of substrate’ as factors. In addition, a survival analysis (Kaplan Meier with Mantel-Cox log-rank post-hoc tests; α = 0.05) was conducted to obtain the survival probability during the steps in the fatigue test. Fractographic and finite element (FEA) analyzes were also conducted. The factors ‘ceramic material’, ‘type of substrate’ and the interaction between both were verified to be statistically significant (p < .001). All evaluated ceramics presented higher fatigue failure load (FFL), cycles for failure (CFF) and survival probabilities when cemented to the metallic alloy substrate. Among the restorative materials, YZ and LD restorations presented the best fatigue behavior when adhesively cemented onto the metallic alloy substrate, while FEL obtained the lowest FFL and CFF for both substrates. The LD, PICN and YZ restorations showed similar fatigue performance considering the epoxy resin substrate. A more rigid foundation substrate improves the fatigue performance of adhesively cemented glass, polycrystalline and polymer infiltrated-ceramic simplified restorations.en
dc.description.affiliationPhD Post-Graduate Program in Oral Science (Prosthodontic Unit) Faculty of Odontology Federal University of Santa Maria
dc.description.affiliationDepartment of Dental Materials and Prosthodontics Institute of Science and Technology ICT/SJC São Paulo State University – UNESP, São José dos Campos
dc.description.affiliationDepartment of Dental Materials Science Academic Centre for Dentistry Amsterdam (ACTA) Universiteit van Amsterdam and Vrije Universiteit
dc.description.affiliationUnespDepartment of Dental Materials and Prosthodontics Institute of Science and Technology ICT/SJC São Paulo State University – UNESP, São José dos Campos
dc.description.sponsorshipCoordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior (CAPES)
dc.description.sponsorshipFundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado do Rio Grande do Sul
dc.description.sponsorshipIdCAPES: 001
dc.description.sponsorshipIdFundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado do Rio Grande do Sul: 18/2551-0000520-7
dc.identifierhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jmbbm.2021.104391
dc.identifier.citationJournal of the Mechanical Behavior of Biomedical Materials, v. 117.
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.jmbbm.2021.104391
dc.identifier.issn1878-0180
dc.identifier.issn1751-6161
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85101139760
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11449/207316
dc.language.isoeng
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of the Mechanical Behavior of Biomedical Materials
dc.sourceScopus
dc.subjectAdhesion
dc.subjectCyclic loading
dc.subjectDental ceramics
dc.subjectElastic modulus
dc.subjectFatigue failure
dc.subjectMonolithic restorations
dc.titleInfluence of the foundation substrate on the fatigue behavior of bonded glass, zirconia polycrystals, and polymer infiltrated ceramic simplified CAD-CAM restorationsen
dc.typeArtigo
dspace.entity.typePublication
unesp.author.orcid0000-0002-4658-9717[1]
unesp.author.orcid0000-0002-5707-7565[2]
unesp.author.orcid0000-0002-9077-9067[3]
unesp.author.orcid0000-0001-7203-6924[6]
unesp.campusUniversidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP), Instituto de Ciência e Tecnologia, São José dos Campospt
unesp.departmentMateriais Odontológicos e Prótese - ICTpt

Arquivos