Logotipo do repositório
 

Publicação:
Comparison between infrared and hot-blade beak trimming methods in white and brown pullets: performance, organ and bone development

dc.contributor.authorGuarnieri, P. C.
dc.contributor.authorPagnussatt, H.
dc.contributor.authorAniecevski, E.
dc.contributor.authorDal Santo, A.
dc.contributor.authorLeite, F.
dc.contributor.authorValentini, F. D. A.
dc.contributor.authorFacchi, C. S.
dc.contributor.authorZaccaron, G.
dc.contributor.authorBosetti, G. E.
dc.contributor.authorRossatto, G.
dc.contributor.authorBoiago, M. M.
dc.contributor.authorTavernari, F. C.
dc.contributor.authorArtoni, S. M. B. [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorPetrolli, T. G.
dc.contributor.institutionUniv Oeste Santa Catarina
dc.contributor.institutionUniv Estado Santa Catarina
dc.contributor.institutionEmpresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária (EMBRAPA)
dc.contributor.institutionUniversidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)
dc.date.accessioned2021-06-25T11:47:29Z
dc.date.available2021-06-25T11:47:29Z
dc.date.issued2020-11-01
dc.description.abstractThe purpose of this study was to evaluate infrared beak trimming versus hot-blade beak trimming on performance, organ and bone development of laying pullets, using 240 birds, at 0-16 weeks of age, from two strains (white layer Hy-Line W36 and brown layer Hy-Line Brown). Infrared debeaking was performed on the first day of life in the hatchery, whereas hot-blade beak trimming was performed at eight days of age. Zootechnical performance at 6, 9, 12 and 15 weeks of age was analyzed. At the end of the trial, one Bird per experimental unit was euthanized for liver, gizzard, proventriculus, heart and small intestine relative weight evaluation. Both tibiotarsus were collected to measure bone breaking resistance, bone mineral content and bone densitometry. There was higher body weight and feed intake in both bird strains submitted to infrared beak trimming. Additionally, hot-blade white layers presented lower body development and feed intake. The debeaking methods did not influence relative organ weights or tibiotarsus parameters evaluated. We conclude that the infrared beak trimming method promotes better pullet body development than the conventional hot-blade method, improving feed intake, without compromising organ and bone development, being a more adequate debeaking method to be used in layer production.en
dc.description.affiliationUniv Oeste Santa Catarina, Xanxere, SC, Brazil
dc.description.affiliationUniv Estado Santa Catarina, Chapeco, SC, Brazil
dc.description.affiliationEmpresa Brasileira Pesquisa Agropecuaria, Concordia, SC, Brazil
dc.description.affiliationUniv Estadual Paulista, Jaboticabal, SP, Brazil
dc.description.affiliationUnespUniv Estadual Paulista, Jaboticabal, SP, Brazil
dc.format.extent2373-2380
dc.identifierhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1678-4162-11964
dc.identifier.citationArquivo Brasileiro De Medicina Veterinaria E Zootecnia. Minas Gerais: Arquivo Brasileiro Medicina Veterinaria Zootecnia, v. 72, n. 6, p. 2373-2380, 2020.
dc.identifier.doi10.1590/1678-4162-11964
dc.identifier.fileS0102-09352020000602373.pdf
dc.identifier.issn0102-0935
dc.identifier.scieloS0102-09352020000602373
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11449/209071
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000604340200044
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherArquivo Brasileiro Medicina Veterinaria Zootecnia
dc.relation.ispartofArquivo Brasileiro De Medicina Veterinaria E Zootecnia
dc.rights.accessRightsAcesso abertopt
dc.sourceWeb of Science
dc.subjectanimal welfare
dc.subjectdebeaking
dc.subjectdensitometry
dc.subjectlayer hens
dc.subjectpoultry
dc.titleComparison between infrared and hot-blade beak trimming methods in white and brown pullets: performance, organ and bone developmenten
dc.typeArtigopt
dcterms.rightsHolderArquivo Brasileiro Medicina Veterinaria Zootecnia
dspace.entity.typePublication
unesp.campusUniversidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP), Faculdade de Ciências Agrárias e Veterinárias, Jaboticabalpt

Arquivos

Pacote Original

Agora exibindo 1 - 1 de 1
Carregando...
Imagem de Miniatura
Nome:
S0102-09352020000602373.pdf
Tamanho:
308.79 KB
Formato:
Adobe Portable Document Format