Logotipo do repositório
 

Publicação:
Influence of Different Surface Treatments on Bond Strength of Resin Composite Using the Intrinsic Characterization Technique

dc.contributor.authorBarcellos, D. C. [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorPalazon, M. T. [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorPucci, C. R. [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorAizawa, L. H. [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorGoncalves, S. E. P. [UNESP]
dc.contributor.institutionUniversidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)
dc.date.accessioned2014-12-03T13:11:12Z
dc.date.available2014-12-03T13:11:12Z
dc.date.issued2013-11-01
dc.description.abstractObjective: This study evaluated the influence of different surface treatments on the resin bond strength/light-cured characterizing materials (LCCMs), using the intrinsic characterization technique. The intrinsic technique is characterized by the use of LCCMs between the increments of resin composite (resin/thin film of LCCM/external layer of resin covering the LCCM).Materials and Methods: Using a silicone matrix, 240 blocks of composite (Z350/3M ESPE) were fabricated. The surfaces received different surface treatments, totaling four groups (n=60): Group C (control group), no surface treatment was used; Group PA, 37% phosphoric acid for one minute and washing the surface for two minutes; Group RD, roughening with diamond tip; and Group AO, aluminum oxide. Each group was divided into four subgroups (n=15), according to the LCCMs used: Subgroup WT, White Tetric Color pigment (Ivoclar/Vivadent) LCCM; Subgroup BT, Black Tetric Color pigment (Ivoclar/Vivadent) LCCM; Subgroup WK, White Kolor Plus pigment (Kerr) LCCM; Subgroup BK, Brown Kolor Plus pigment (Kerr) LCCM. All materials were used according to the manufacturer's instructions. After this, block composites were fabricated over the LCCMs. Specimens were sectioned and submitted to microtensile testing to evaluate the bond strength at the interface. Data were submitted to two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) (surface treatment and LCCMs) and Tukey tests.Results: ANOVA presented a value of p<0.05. The mean values (+/- SD) for the factor surface treatment were as follows: Group C, 30.05 MPa (+/- 5.88)a; Group PA, 23.46 MPa (+/- 5.45)b; Group RD, 21.39 MPa (+/- 6.36)b; Group AO, 15.05 MPa (+/- 4.57)c. Groups followed by the same letters do not present significant statistical differences. The control group presented significantly higher bond strength values than the other groups. The group that received surface treatment with aluminum oxide presented significantly lower bond strength values than the other groups.Conclusion: Surface treatments of composite with phosphoric acid, diamond tip, and aluminum oxide significantly diminished the bond strength between composite and the LCCMs.en
dc.description.affiliationSao Paulo State Univ, UNESP, Sao Jose dos Campos Dent Sch, Dept Restorat Dent, Sao Jose Dos Campos, Brazil
dc.description.affiliationSao Paulo State Univ, UNESP, Sao Jose dos Campos Sch Dent, Sao Jose Dos Campos, Brazil
dc.description.affiliationUniv Estadual Paulista, UNESP, Sao Jose dos Campos Sch Dent, Dept Restorat Dent, Sao Jose Dos Campos, Brazil
dc.description.affiliationUniv Estadual Paulista, UNESP, Sao Jose dos Campos Sch Dent, Dept Restorat Dent,Clin Res Acad Grp,Grp Acad Pes, Sao Jose Dos Campos, Brazil
dc.description.affiliationSao Paulo State Univ, UNESP, Sao Jose dos Campos Dent Sch, Sao Jose Dos Campos, Brazil
dc.description.affiliationUnespSao Paulo State Univ, UNESP, Sao Jose dos Campos Dent Sch, Dept Restorat Dent, Sao Jose Dos Campos, Brazil
dc.description.affiliationUnespSao Paulo State Univ, UNESP, Sao Jose dos Campos Sch Dent, Sao Jose Dos Campos, Brazil
dc.description.affiliationUnespUniv Estadual Paulista, UNESP, Sao Jose dos Campos Sch Dent, Dept Restorat Dent, Sao Jose Dos Campos, Brazil
dc.description.affiliationUnespUniv Estadual Paulista, UNESP, Sao Jose dos Campos Sch Dent, Dept Restorat Dent,Clin Res Acad Grp,Grp Acad Pes, Sao Jose Dos Campos, Brazil
dc.description.affiliationUnespSao Paulo State Univ, UNESP, Sao Jose dos Campos Dent Sch, Sao Jose Dos Campos, Brazil
dc.format.extent635-643
dc.identifierhttp://dx.doi.org/10.2341/12-204-L
dc.identifier.citationOperative Dentistry. Indianapolis: Operative Dentistry Inc, v. 38, n. 6, p. 635-643, 2013.
dc.identifier.doi10.2341/12-204-L
dc.identifier.fileWOS000327173600009.pdf
dc.identifier.issn0361-7734
dc.identifier.lattes1754020652874850
dc.identifier.orcid0000-0003-4830-0400
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11449/112978
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000327173600009
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherOperative Dentistry Inc
dc.relation.ispartofOperative Dentistry
dc.relation.ispartofjcr2.130
dc.relation.ispartofsjr1,180
dc.rights.accessRightsAcesso aberto
dc.sourceWeb of Science
dc.titleInfluence of Different Surface Treatments on Bond Strength of Resin Composite Using the Intrinsic Characterization Techniqueen
dc.typeArtigo
dcterms.rightsHolderOperative Dentistry Inc
dspace.entity.typePublication
unesp.author.lattes1754020652874850[3]
unesp.author.orcid0000-0003-4830-0400[3]
unesp.campusUniversidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP), Instituto de Ciência e Tecnologia, São José dos Campospt
unesp.departmentOdontologia Restauradora - ICTpt

Arquivos

Pacote Original

Agora exibindo 1 - 1 de 1
Carregando...
Imagem de Miniatura
Nome:
WOS000327173600009.pdf
Tamanho:
179.53 KB
Formato:
Adobe Portable Document Format