Publicação:
Three-year evaluation of different adhesion strategies in non-carious cervical lesion restorations: A randomized clinical trial*

dc.contributor.authorGonçalves, Diego Felipe Mardegan [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorShinohara, Mirela Sanae [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorCarvalho, Paulo Roberto Marão De Andrade
dc.contributor.authorRamos, Fernanda De Souza e Silva [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorOliveira, Laryssa De Castro [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorOmoto, Érika Mayumi [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorFagundes, Ticiane Cestari [UNESP]
dc.contributor.institutionUniversidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
dc.contributor.institutionCentro Universitário São Lucas
dc.date.accessioned2022-04-29T08:37:22Z
dc.date.available2022-04-29T08:37:22Z
dc.date.issued2021-01-01
dc.description.abstractObjective: To evaluate non-carious cervical lesions (NCCLs) restored with different adhesion strategies. Methodology: This is a prospective, randomized, double-blind, split-mouth study. An adhesive restorative system (Single Bond Universal/Filtek Z350XT – SBU) was evaluated both without and with selective enamel conditioning (E-SBU), resin-modified glass-ionomer cements (Vitremer; RMGIC), and ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid pretreatment (EDTA; E-RMGIC). In total, 200 restorations, placed in 50 patients, were evaluated at baseline and at a 3-year follow-up using the modified United States Public Health Service (USPHS) criteria. Data were analyzed using the two-proportion equality test, multinomial logistic regression, Wilcoxon test, and Kaplan-Meier survival curves. Results: In total, 42 (84%) patients returned for the 3-year follow-up. SBU showed restoration losses statistically different from RMGIC. Retention was also statistically different in SBU between baseline and the 3-year follow-up. Marginal defects and surface texture were statistically significant for all groups in the period studied, except for the surface texture of SBU and the marginal integrity in E-RMGIC. We observed no statistically significant difference in wear, secondary caries, anatomical form, surface staining, and color over time. Recession degree was the only factor to influence retention rates. Cumulative survival (%) was 89, 98, 98, and 95.3, for SBU, SE-SBU, RMGIC, and E-RMGIC, respectively, without significant differences among them. There was a statistically significant difference between survival curves; however, multiple comparison procedures found no statistical differences. Conclusion: Selective enamel etching affected the retention of non-carious cervical restorations. Adhesion using EDTA and resin-modified glass-ionomer cements delayed marginal defects over time. The degree of gingival recession influenced retention rates. Resin composite restorations showed initial marginal defects, and ionomer restorations, reduced surface luster. EDTA pre-treatment followed by resin-modified glass-ionomer cements may be a promising adhesion strategy for NCCL restorations.en
dc.description.affiliationUniversidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) Faculdade de Odontologia de Araçatuba Departamento de Odontologia Preventiva e Restauradora
dc.description.affiliationCentro Universitário São Lucas
dc.description.affiliationUnespUniversidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) Faculdade de Odontologia de Araçatuba Departamento de Odontologia Preventiva e Restauradora
dc.identifierhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1678-7757-2021-0192
dc.identifier.citationJournal of Applied Oral Science, v. 29.
dc.identifier.doi10.1590/1678-7757-2021-0192
dc.identifier.issn1678-7765
dc.identifier.issn1678-7757
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85121186087
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11449/230059
dc.language.isoeng
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of Applied Oral Science
dc.sourceScopus
dc.subjectAcid etching
dc.subjectAdhesive systems
dc.subjectGlass-ionomer cements
dc.subjectNon-carious cervical lesion
dc.titleThree-year evaluation of different adhesion strategies in non-carious cervical lesion restorations: A randomized clinical trial*en
dc.typeArtigopt
dspace.entity.typePublication
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublication8b3335a4-1163-438a-a0e2-921a46e0380d
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublication.latestForDiscovery8b3335a4-1163-438a-a0e2-921a46e0380d
unesp.campusUniversidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP), Faculdade de Odontologia, Araçatubapt
unesp.departmentOdontologia Restauradora - FOApt

Arquivos