Publicação: Three-year evaluation of different adhesion strategies in non-carious cervical lesion restorations: A randomized clinical trial*
dc.contributor.author | Gonçalves, Diego Felipe Mardegan [UNESP] | |
dc.contributor.author | Shinohara, Mirela Sanae [UNESP] | |
dc.contributor.author | Carvalho, Paulo Roberto Marão De Andrade | |
dc.contributor.author | Ramos, Fernanda De Souza e Silva [UNESP] | |
dc.contributor.author | Oliveira, Laryssa De Castro [UNESP] | |
dc.contributor.author | Omoto, Érika Mayumi [UNESP] | |
dc.contributor.author | Fagundes, Ticiane Cestari [UNESP] | |
dc.contributor.institution | Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) | |
dc.contributor.institution | Centro Universitário São Lucas | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2022-04-29T08:37:22Z | |
dc.date.available | 2022-04-29T08:37:22Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2021-01-01 | |
dc.description.abstract | Objective: To evaluate non-carious cervical lesions (NCCLs) restored with different adhesion strategies. Methodology: This is a prospective, randomized, double-blind, split-mouth study. An adhesive restorative system (Single Bond Universal/Filtek Z350XT – SBU) was evaluated both without and with selective enamel conditioning (E-SBU), resin-modified glass-ionomer cements (Vitremer; RMGIC), and ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid pretreatment (EDTA; E-RMGIC). In total, 200 restorations, placed in 50 patients, were evaluated at baseline and at a 3-year follow-up using the modified United States Public Health Service (USPHS) criteria. Data were analyzed using the two-proportion equality test, multinomial logistic regression, Wilcoxon test, and Kaplan-Meier survival curves. Results: In total, 42 (84%) patients returned for the 3-year follow-up. SBU showed restoration losses statistically different from RMGIC. Retention was also statistically different in SBU between baseline and the 3-year follow-up. Marginal defects and surface texture were statistically significant for all groups in the period studied, except for the surface texture of SBU and the marginal integrity in E-RMGIC. We observed no statistically significant difference in wear, secondary caries, anatomical form, surface staining, and color over time. Recession degree was the only factor to influence retention rates. Cumulative survival (%) was 89, 98, 98, and 95.3, for SBU, SE-SBU, RMGIC, and E-RMGIC, respectively, without significant differences among them. There was a statistically significant difference between survival curves; however, multiple comparison procedures found no statistical differences. Conclusion: Selective enamel etching affected the retention of non-carious cervical restorations. Adhesion using EDTA and resin-modified glass-ionomer cements delayed marginal defects over time. The degree of gingival recession influenced retention rates. Resin composite restorations showed initial marginal defects, and ionomer restorations, reduced surface luster. EDTA pre-treatment followed by resin-modified glass-ionomer cements may be a promising adhesion strategy for NCCL restorations. | en |
dc.description.affiliation | Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) Faculdade de Odontologia de Araçatuba Departamento de Odontologia Preventiva e Restauradora | |
dc.description.affiliation | Centro Universitário São Lucas | |
dc.description.affiliationUnesp | Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) Faculdade de Odontologia de Araçatuba Departamento de Odontologia Preventiva e Restauradora | |
dc.identifier | http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1678-7757-2021-0192 | |
dc.identifier.citation | Journal of Applied Oral Science, v. 29. | |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1590/1678-7757-2021-0192 | |
dc.identifier.issn | 1678-7765 | |
dc.identifier.issn | 1678-7757 | |
dc.identifier.scopus | 2-s2.0-85121186087 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/11449/230059 | |
dc.language.iso | eng | |
dc.relation.ispartof | Journal of Applied Oral Science | |
dc.source | Scopus | |
dc.subject | Acid etching | |
dc.subject | Adhesive systems | |
dc.subject | Glass-ionomer cements | |
dc.subject | Non-carious cervical lesion | |
dc.title | Three-year evaluation of different adhesion strategies in non-carious cervical lesion restorations: A randomized clinical trial* | en |
dc.type | Artigo | pt |
dspace.entity.type | Publication | |
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublication | 8b3335a4-1163-438a-a0e2-921a46e0380d | |
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublication.latestForDiscovery | 8b3335a4-1163-438a-a0e2-921a46e0380d | |
unesp.campus | Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP), Faculdade de Odontologia, Araçatuba | pt |
unesp.department | Odontologia Restauradora - FOA | pt |