Logotipo do repositório
 

Publicação:
Mechanical properties and DIC analyses of CAD/CAM materials

dc.contributor.authorPorto, Thiago [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorRoperto, Renato
dc.contributor.authorAkkus, Anna
dc.contributor.authorAkkus, Ozan
dc.contributor.authorPorto-Neto, Sizenando [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorTeich, Sorin
dc.contributor.authorLang, Lisa
dc.contributor.authorCampos, Edson [UNESP]
dc.contributor.institutionUniversidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
dc.contributor.institutionCase Western Reserve University
dc.date.accessioned2022-04-29T22:42:09Z
dc.date.available2022-04-29T22:42:09Z
dc.date.issued2016-01-01
dc.description.abstractBackground: This study compared two well-known computer-aided-design/computer-aided-manufactured (CAD/ CAM) blocks (Paradigm MZ100 [3M ESPE] and Vitablocs Mark II [Vita] in terms of fracture toughness (Kic), index of brittleness (BI) and stress/strain distributions. Material and Methods: Three-point bending test was used to calculate the fracture toughness, and the relationship between the Kic and the Vickers hardness was used to calculate the index of brittleness. Additionally, digital image correlation (DIC) was used to analyze the stress/strain distribution on both materials. Results: The values for fracture toughness obtained under three-point bending were 1.87Pa√m (±0.69) for Paradigm MZ100 and 1.18Pa√m (±0.17) for Vitablocs Mark II. For the index of brittleness, the values for Paradigm and Vitablocs were 73.13μm-1/2 (±30.72) and 550.22μm-1/2 (±82.46). One-way ANOVA was performed to find differences (α=0.05) and detected deviation between the stress/strain distributions on both materials. Conclusions: Both CAD/CAM materials tested presented similar fracture toughness, but, different strain/stress distributions. Both materials may perform similarly when used in CAD/CAM restorations.en
dc.description.affiliationDepartment of Restorative Dentistry Faculty of Dentistry Sao Paulo State University
dc.description.affiliationDepartment of Comprehensive Care School of Dental Medicine Case Western Reserve University
dc.description.affiliationUnespDepartment of Restorative Dentistry Faculty of Dentistry Sao Paulo State University
dc.format.extente512-e516
dc.identifierhttp://dx.doi.org/10.4317/jced.53014
dc.identifier.citationJournal of Clinical and Experimental Dentistry, v. 8, n. 5, p. e512-e516, 2016.
dc.identifier.doi10.4317/jced.53014
dc.identifier.issn1989-5488
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85011805428
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11449/232566
dc.language.isoeng
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of Clinical and Experimental Dentistry
dc.sourceScopus
dc.subjectCAD/CAM
dc.subjectCeramic
dc.subjectComposite resin
dc.subjectFracture toughness
dc.subjectHybrid materials
dc.titleMechanical properties and DIC analyses of CAD/CAM materialsen
dc.typeArtigo
dspace.entity.typePublication
unesp.campusUniversidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP), Faculdade de Odontologia, Araraquarapt
unesp.departmentOdontologia Restauradora - FOARpt

Arquivos