Logotipo do repositório
 

Publicação:
Comparison between two forms of granular activated carbon for the removal of pharmaceuticals from different waters

dc.contributor.authorLima, Lisandra [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorBaêta, Bruno E.L.
dc.contributor.authorLima, Diego R.S.
dc.contributor.authorAfonso, Robson J.C.F.
dc.contributor.authorDe Aquino, Sérgio F.
dc.contributor.authorLibânio, Marcelo
dc.contributor.institutionUniversidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)
dc.contributor.institutionFederal University of Ouro Preto (UFOP)
dc.contributor.institutionUniversidade Federal de Minas Gerais (UFMG)
dc.date.accessioned2018-12-11T16:41:30Z
dc.date.available2018-12-11T16:41:30Z
dc.date.issued2016-06-02
dc.description.abstractThe aim of this study was to evaluate the performance of two forms of basic granular activated carbon (GAC), mineral (pH = 10.5) and vegetal (pH = 9), for the removal of three pharmaceuticals, as sulphamethoxazole (SMX), diclofenac (DCF) and 17β-estradiol (E2), from two different matrices: fortified distilled (2.4-3.0mgL-1 and pH from 5.5 to 6.5) and natural (∼1.0mgL-1 and pH from 7.1 to 7.2) water in a bench scale. The Rapid Small-Scale Column Test used to assess the ability of mineral and vegetal GAC on removal of such pharmaceuticals led to removal capacities varying from 14.9 to 23.5mgg-1 for E2, from 23.7 to 24.2mgg-1 for DCF and from 20.5 to 20.6mgg-1 for SMX. Removal efficiencies of 71%, 88% and 74% for DCF, SMX and E2, respectively, were obtained at breakthrough point when using mineral GAC, whereas for the vegetal GAC the figures were 76%, 77% and 65%, respectively. The carbon usage rate at the breakthrough point varied from 11.9 to 14.5Lg-1 for mineral GAC and from 8.8 to 14.8Lg-1 for vegetal GAC. Mineral CAG also exhibited the best performance when treating fortified natural water, since nearly complete removal was observed for all contaminants in the column operated for 22h at a carbon usage rate of 2.9Lg-1.en
dc.description.affiliationDepartment of Civil Engineering Faculty of Engineering São Paulo State University (Unesp)
dc.description.affiliationDepartment of Chemistry Institute of Exact and Biological Sciences Federal University of Ouro Preto (UFOP)
dc.description.affiliationDepartment of Hydraulic Engineering and Water Resources Faculty of Engineering Federal University of Minas Gerais (UFMG)
dc.description.affiliationUnespDepartment of Civil Engineering Faculty of Engineering São Paulo State University (Unesp)
dc.format.extent1334-1345
dc.identifierhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09593330.2015.1114030
dc.identifier.citationEnvironmental Technology (United Kingdom), v. 37, n. 11, p. 1334-1345, 2016.
dc.identifier.doi10.1080/09593330.2015.1114030
dc.identifier.file2-s2.0-84961214466.pdf
dc.identifier.issn1479-487X
dc.identifier.issn0959-3330
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-84961214466
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11449/168491
dc.language.isoeng
dc.relation.ispartofEnvironmental Technology (United Kingdom)
dc.relation.ispartofsjr0,503
dc.rights.accessRightsAcesso aberto
dc.sourceScopus
dc.subjectadsorption
dc.subjectendocrinedisrupting compounds
dc.subjectgranular activated carbon
dc.subjectPharmaceuticals
dc.subjectwater treatment
dc.titleComparison between two forms of granular activated carbon for the removal of pharmaceuticals from different watersen
dc.typeArtigo
dspace.entity.typePublication

Arquivos

Pacote Original

Agora exibindo 1 - 1 de 1
Carregando...
Imagem de Miniatura
Nome:
2-s2.0-84961214466.pdf
Tamanho:
1.58 MB
Formato:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Descrição:

Coleções