Logo do repositório

Evaluation of Bone Heating, Drill Deformation, and Drill Roughness After Implant Osteotomy: Guided Surgery and Classic Drilling Procedure

dc.contributor.authordos Santos, Pâmela Letícia
dc.contributor.authorQueiroz, Thallita Pereira
dc.contributor.authorMargonar, Rogério
dc.contributor.authorde Souza Carvalho, Abrahão Cavalcante Gomes [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorBetoni, Walter
dc.contributor.authorRezende, Regis Rocha Rodrigues
dc.contributor.authordos Santos, Paulo Henrique [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorGarcia, Idelmo Rangel [UNESP]
dc.contributor.institutionUniversidade do Sagrado Coração (USC)
dc.contributor.institutionUniversity Center of Araraquara (UNIARA)
dc.contributor.institutionUNIARA
dc.contributor.institutionUniversidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)
dc.contributor.institutionUniversity of Cuiabá (UNIC)
dc.contributor.institutionDental School of Cuiabá
dc.contributor.institutionUniversity Center Barretos (UniFEB)
dc.date.accessioned2021-06-25T10:32:45Z
dc.date.available2021-06-25T10:32:45Z
dc.date.issued2014-01-01
dc.description.abstractPurpose: This study evaluated and compared bone heating, drill deformation, and drill roughness after several implant osteotomies in the guided surgery technique and the classic drilling procedure. Materials and Methods: The tibias of 20 rabbits were used. The animals were divided into a guided surgery group (GG) and a control group (CG); subgroups were then designated (G0, G1, G2, G3, and G4, corresponding to drills used 0, 10, 20, 30 and 40 times, respectively). Each animal received 10 sequential osteotomies (5 in each tibia) with each technique. Thermal changes were quantified, drill roughness was measured, and the drills were subjected to scanning electron microscopy. Results: Bone temperature generated by drilling was significantly higher in the GG than in the CG. Drill deformation in the GG and CG increased with drill use, and in the CG a significant difference between G0 and groups G3 and G4 was observed. In the GG, a significant difference between G0 and all other groups was found. For GG versus CG, a significant difference was found in the 40th osteotomy. Drill roughness in both groups was progressive in accordance with increased use, but there was no statistically significant difference between subgroups or between GG and CG overall. Conclusion: During preparation of implant osteotomies, the guided surgery technique generated a higher bone temperature and deformed drills more than the classic drilling procedure. The increase in tissue temperature was directly proportional to the number of times drills were used, but neither technique generated critical necrosisinducing temperatures. Drill deformation was directly proportional to the number of times the drills were used. The roughness of the drills was directly proportional to the number of reuses in both groups but tended to be higher in the GG group. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2014;29:51-58. doi: 10.11607/jomi.2919en
dc.description.affiliationAssistant Professor Discipline of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery and Integrated Clinic Department of Oral Biology Postgraduate Studies Universidade do Sagrado Coração (USC)
dc.description.affiliationAssistant Professor Discipline of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery and Integrated Clinic University Center of Araraquara (UNIARA)
dc.description.affiliationAssistant Professor Discipline of Periodontology and Integrated Clinic University Center of Araraquara UNIARA
dc.description.affiliationCoordinating Professor Postgraduate Course of Dental Implantology UNIARA
dc.description.affiliationPhD Student Department of Surgery and Integrated Clinic Discipline of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery Dentistry School of Araçatuba São Paulo State University (UNESP)
dc.description.affiliationAssistant Professor Department of Oral Surgery University of Cuiabá (UNIC)
dc.description.affiliationAssistant Professor Specialization in Dental Implantology Dental School of Cuiabá
dc.description.affiliationSpecialist in Implantology University Center Barretos (UniFEB)
dc.description.affiliationAssociate Professor Department of Dental Materials and Prosthodontics Discipline of Dental Materials UNESP
dc.description.affiliationProfessor Department of Surgery Discipline of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery Dentistry School of Araçatuba UNESP
dc.description.affiliationUnespPhD Student Department of Surgery and Integrated Clinic Discipline of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery Dentistry School of Araçatuba São Paulo State University (UNESP)
dc.description.affiliationUnespAssociate Professor Department of Dental Materials and Prosthodontics Discipline of Dental Materials UNESP
dc.description.affiliationUnespProfessor Department of Surgery Discipline of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery Dentistry School of Araçatuba UNESP
dc.format.extent51-58
dc.identifierhttp://dx.doi.org/10.11607/jomi.2919
dc.identifier.citationInternational Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Implants, v. 29, n. 1, p. 51-58, 2014.
dc.identifier.doi10.11607/jomi.2919
dc.identifier.issn1942-4434
dc.identifier.issn0882-2786
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-84900012096
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11449/206483
dc.language.isoeng
dc.relation.ispartofInternational Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Implants
dc.sourceScopus
dc.subjectbone overheating
dc.subjectdental implants
dc.subjectosteotomy
dc.titleEvaluation of Bone Heating, Drill Deformation, and Drill Roughness After Implant Osteotomy: Guided Surgery and Classic Drilling Procedureen
dc.typeArtigopt
dspace.entity.typePublication
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublication8b3335a4-1163-438a-a0e2-921a46e0380d
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublication.latestForDiscovery8b3335a4-1163-438a-a0e2-921a46e0380d
unesp.campusUniversidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP), Faculdade de Odontologia, Araçatubapt
unesp.departmentCirurgia e Clínica Integrada - FOApt

Arquivos