Logotipo do repositório
 

Publicação:
Microbiological assessment at slaughter of chicken carcasses from commercial, backyard and semi-backyard production systems

dc.contributor.authorGarcia, Débora Tamanaha
dc.contributor.authorNascimento, Yago Fernandes [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorda Cunha Dias, Sthefany [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorMoura, Amanda Oliveira
dc.contributor.authorCosta, Priscila Cristina
dc.contributor.authordo Amaral, Alexandre Bicalho
dc.contributor.authorPeres, Phelipe Augusto Borba Martins
dc.contributor.authorde Fátima Carrijo, Kênia
dc.contributor.authorCossi, Marcus Vinícius
dc.contributor.institutionUniversidade Federal de Uberlândia (UFU)
dc.contributor.institutionUniversidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
dc.date.accessioned2022-04-28T19:50:11Z
dc.date.available2022-04-28T19:50:11Z
dc.date.issued2021-12-01
dc.description.abstractIntroduction: Smaller scale, alternative, chicken production systems are gaining popularity globally. However, this brings public health and market confidence concerns, especially where there are no established standards of production. The aim of this study was to carry out a microbiological analysis of chicken carcasses from the commercial, backyard and semi-backyard production systems, slaughtered in the same slaughterhouse. Methodology: Samples of 102 chicken carcasses were taken in two steps of the slaughter (A: after bleeding; and B: after chiller tank) and were subjected to aerobic mesophilic, coliforms at 35 °C and coliforms at 45 °C counts, and Salmonella spp. detection. Salmonella spp. isolates were subjected to antimicrobial resistance analysis. Results: At slaughter step A, carcasses from the backyard system had less contamination than carcasses from the commercial system, with a difference of 0.7 log10 CFU/mL. Salmonella was identified in carcasses of all production systems and in both slaughter steps. Nine chicken carcasses were positive for Salmonella and no significant difference was observed in the occurrence of Salmonella amongst the carcasses from different production systems. Two Salmonella isolates, that presented the highest resistance profiles (one isolate was resistant to eight and the other to six out of ten tested antibiotics), were identified on carcasses from the semi-backyard system. Conclusions: Carcasses from the backyard system had a lower microbial count at the initial step of the slaughter process than the commercial production system. In addition, greater resistance to antimicrobials was observed in Salmonella isolates from semi-backyard system.en
dc.description.affiliationFaculty of Veterinary Medicine Federal University of Uberlândia Umuarama Campus
dc.description.affiliationSchool of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Science – UNESP Botucatu Campus
dc.description.affiliationUnespSchool of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Science – UNESP Botucatu Campus
dc.description.sponsorshipCoordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior (CAPES)
dc.description.sponsorshipConselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (CNPq)
dc.format.extent1891-1898
dc.identifierhttp://dx.doi.org/10.3855/jidc.14882
dc.identifier.citationJournal of Infection in Developing Countries, v. 15, n. 12, p. 1891-1898, 2021.
dc.identifier.doi10.3855/jidc.14882
dc.identifier.issn1972-2680
dc.identifier.issn2036-6590
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85123657454
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11449/223358
dc.language.isoeng
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of Infection in Developing Countries
dc.sourceScopus
dc.subjectBroilers
dc.subjectCarcass quality
dc.subjectFree range
dc.subjectMicrobiology
dc.subjectSalmonella
dc.titleMicrobiological assessment at slaughter of chicken carcasses from commercial, backyard and semi-backyard production systemsen
dc.typeArtigopt
dspace.entity.typePublication
unesp.campusUniversidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP), Faculdade de Medicina Veterinária e Zootecnia, Botucatupt

Arquivos