Logotipo do repositório
 

Publicação:
Reproductive phenology of Melastomataceae species with contrasting reproductive systems: contemporary and historical drivers

dc.contributor.authorBrito, V. L.G.
dc.contributor.authorMaia, F. R.
dc.contributor.authorSilveira, F. A.O.
dc.contributor.authorFracasso, C. M.
dc.contributor.authorLemos-Filho, J. P.
dc.contributor.authorFernandes, G. W.
dc.contributor.authorGoldenberg, R.
dc.contributor.authorMorellato, L. P.C. [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorSazima, M.
dc.contributor.authorStaggemeier, V. G. [UNESP]
dc.contributor.institutionUniversidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP)
dc.contributor.institutionUniversidade Federal de Uberlândia (UFU)
dc.contributor.institutionUniversidade Federal do Paraná (UFPR)
dc.contributor.institutionUniversidade Federal de Minas Gerais (UFMG)
dc.contributor.institutionStanford University
dc.contributor.institutionUniversidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)
dc.date.accessioned2018-12-11T16:48:13Z
dc.date.available2018-12-11T16:48:13Z
dc.date.issued2017-09-01
dc.description.abstractFlowering and fruiting are key events in the life history of plants, and both are critical to their reproductive success. Besides the role of evolutionary history, plant reproductive phenology is regulated by abiotic factors and shaped by biotic interactions with pollinators and seed dispersers. In Melastomataceae, a dominant Neotropical family, the reproductive systems vary from allogamous with biotic pollination to apomictic, and seed dispersal varies from dry (self-dispersed) to fleshy (animal-dispersed) fruits. Such variety in reproductive strategies is likely to affect flowering and fruiting phenologies. In this study, we described the reproductive phenology of 81 Melastomataceae species occurring in two biodiversity hotspots: the Atlantic rain forest and the campo rupestre. We aim to disentangle the role of abiotic and biotic factors defining flowering and fruiting times of Melastomataceae species, considering the contrasting breeding and seed dispersal systems, and their evolutionary history. In both vegetation types, pollinator-dependent species had higher flowering seasonality than pollinator-independent ones. Flowering patterns presented phylogenetic signal regardless of vegetation type. Fruiting of fleshy-fruited species was seasonal in campo rupestre but not in Atlantic rain forest; the fruiting of dry-fruited species was also not seasonal in both vegetation types. Fruiting showed a low phylogenetic signal, probably because the influence of environment and dispersal agents on fruiting time is stronger than the phylogenetic affinity. Considering these ecophylogenetic patterns, our results indicate that flowering may be shaped by the different reproductive strategies of Melastomataceae lineages, while fruiting patterns may be governed mainly by the seed dispersal strategy and flowering time, with less phylogenetic influence.en
dc.description.affiliationPrograma de Pós-Graduação em Biologia Vegetal Instituto de Biologia Universidade Estadual de Campinas
dc.description.affiliationInstituto de Biologia Universidade Federal de Uberlândia
dc.description.affiliationPrograma de Pós-Graduação em Botânica Universidade Federal do Paraná Centro Politécnico
dc.description.affiliationDepartamento de Botânica Instituto de Ciências Biológicas Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais
dc.description.affiliationEcologia Evolutiva e Biodiversidade Departamento de Biologia Geral Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais
dc.description.affiliationDepartment of Biology Stanford University
dc.description.affiliationDepartamento de Botânica Universidade Federal do Paraná Centro Politécnico
dc.description.affiliationUNESP Universidade Estadual Paulista Instituto de Biociências Departamento de Botânica Laboratório de Fenologia
dc.description.affiliationLaboratório de Biossistemática Departamento de Biologia Vegetal Instituto de Biologia Universidade Estadual de Campinas
dc.description.affiliationUnespUNESP Universidade Estadual Paulista Instituto de Biociências Departamento de Botânica Laboratório de Fenologia
dc.description.sponsorshipFundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo (FAPESP)
dc.description.sponsorshipFundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de Minas Gerais (FAPEMIG)
dc.description.sponsorshipIdFAPESP: #2010/51307-0
dc.description.sponsorshipIdFAPESP: #2010/51494-5
dc.description.sponsorshipIdFAPESP: #2012/51425-5
dc.description.sponsorshipIdFAPESP: #2013/50155-0
dc.description.sponsorshipIdFAPESP: #2014/13899-4
dc.description.sponsorshipIdFAPEMIG: APQ-02317
dc.format.extent806-817
dc.identifierhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1111/plb.12591
dc.identifier.citationPlant Biology, v. 19, n. 5, p. 806-817, 2017.
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/plb.12591
dc.identifier.issn1438-8677
dc.identifier.issn1435-8603
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85023639587
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11449/169923
dc.language.isoeng
dc.relation.ispartofPlant Biology
dc.relation.ispartofsjr0,939
dc.rights.accessRightsAcesso restrito
dc.sourceScopus
dc.subjectAbiotic factors
dc.subjectapomixis
dc.subjectAtlantic forest
dc.subjectcampo rupestre
dc.subjectflowering
dc.subjectfruiting
dc.subjectpollination
dc.subjectseed dispersal
dc.titleReproductive phenology of Melastomataceae species with contrasting reproductive systems: contemporary and historical driversen
dc.typeArtigo
dspace.entity.typePublication
unesp.author.orcid0000-0002-2727-3063[1]
unesp.author.orcid0000-0002-2467-4646[2]

Arquivos

Coleções