Logotipo do repositório
 

Publicação:
Cytotoxicity and genotoxicity of natural resin-based experimental endodontic sealers

dc.contributor.authorSilva, Gleyce O. [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorCavalcanti, Bruno N. [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorOliveira, Tatiana R. [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorBin, Claudia V. [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorCamargo, Samira E. A. [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorCamargo, Carlos H. R. [UNESP]
dc.contributor.institutionUniversidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)
dc.contributor.institutionUniversity of Michigan
dc.date.accessioned2018-12-11T16:39:12Z
dc.date.available2018-12-11T16:39:12Z
dc.date.issued2016-05-01
dc.description.abstractObjectives: The development of endodontic sealers based on natural resins seems to be promising, given their improved biological properties. This study evaluated the cytotoxic and genotoxic effects of two experimental root canal sealers, based on extracts from Copaifera multijuga and Ricinus communis (castor oil polymer), comparing them to synthetic resin-based sealers: a single methacrylate-based, a multi-methacrylate-based, and an epoxy resin-based sealers. Materials and methods: Sealers were prepared, set, and exposed to cell culture medium for 24 h at 37 °C with CO2. V79 cells were exposed to serial dilutions of the extracts of each sealer for 24 h. Cell viability was measured by the MTT assay and genotoxicity was assessed by the formation of micronuclei. Results: The single methacrylate-based sealer had the most cytotoxic effects, with significant reduction in cell viability in all dilutions of the extract. The castor oil polymer-based sealer was, on the other hand, the most biocompatible sealer, with no cytotoxic effects at any concentration. All tested sealers were not genotoxic, excepting the single methacrylate-based sealer. Conclusions: The tested natural resin-based sealers presented low cytotoxic and no genotoxic effects on cell cultures. Clinical relevance: These results may suggest a good alternative to develop new endodontic sealers, in order to achieve better biological response and healing, when compared to commercially available sealers.en
dc.description.affiliationDepartment of Restorative Dentistry Institute of Science and Technology Univ. Estadual Paulista, Av. Eng. Francisco Jose Longo, 777
dc.description.affiliationDepartment of Biosciences Institute of Science and Technology Univ. Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
dc.description.affiliationDepartment of Cariology Restorative Sciences and Endodontics School of Dentistry University of Michigan
dc.description.affiliationUnespDepartment of Biosciences Institute of Science and Technology Univ. Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
dc.format.extent815-819
dc.identifierhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00784-015-1567-4
dc.identifier.citationClinical Oral Investigations, v. 20, n. 4, p. 815-819, 2016.
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/s00784-015-1567-4
dc.identifier.file2-s2.0-84941352205.pdf
dc.identifier.issn1436-3771
dc.identifier.issn1432-6981
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-84941352205
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11449/168004
dc.language.isoeng
dc.relation.ispartofClinical Oral Investigations
dc.relation.ispartofsjr0,986
dc.relation.ispartofsjr0,986
dc.rights.accessRightsAcesso aberto
dc.sourceScopus
dc.subjectBiocompatibility
dc.subjectCytotoxicity
dc.subjectGenotoxicity
dc.subjectRoot canal sealer
dc.titleCytotoxicity and genotoxicity of natural resin-based experimental endodontic sealersen
dc.typeArtigo
dspace.entity.typePublication

Arquivos

Pacote Original

Agora exibindo 1 - 1 de 1
Carregando...
Imagem de Miniatura
Nome:
2-s2.0-84941352205.pdf
Tamanho:
315.89 KB
Formato:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Descrição:

Coleções