Logotipo do repositório
 

Publicação:
Mechanical behavior of implant assisted removable partial denture for Kennedy class II

dc.contributor.authorTribst, João-Paulo-Mendes [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorde Araújo, Rodrigo-Máximo [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorRamanzine, Naiara-Pires [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorSantos, Natália-Ribeiro [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorde Oliveira Dal Piva, Amanda-Maria [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorBorges, Alexandre-Luiz-Souto [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorda Silva, João-Mauricio-Ferraz [UNESP]
dc.contributor.institutionUniversidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)
dc.date.accessioned2020-12-12T01:22:13Z
dc.date.available2020-12-12T01:22:13Z
dc.date.issued2020-01-01
dc.description.abstractBackground: This study evaluated the mechanical response of a removable partial denture (RPD) in Kennedy Class II according to being associated or not with implants. Material and Methods: Four RPDs were manufactured for a Kennedy Class II: CRPD-Conventional RPD, RPD+ 1M, RPD+2M and RPD+12M, respectively, signifying implant assisted RPDs with the implant installed in the first molar, second molar, and in the first and second molars. The finite element method was used to determine the most damaged support tooth under compressive load (300N, 10s) and strain gauge analysis was used to evaluate the microstrain. All groups were submitted to a retentive force analysis (0.5 mm/mm, 100kgf). Microstrain and retentive force data were submitted to One-way ANOVA and the Tukey test, all with α=5%. Results: High microstrain was observed in the second premolar adjacent to the edentulous space under compression load (p < 0.01). RPD+12M presented lower microstrain, however being similar to RPD+2M. RPD+1M presented a higher mean value of retentive force, but similar to RPD+12M. FEM showed RPD assisted by implants concentrates less stress in the periodontal ligament. The association of two implants was sufficient to decrease the stress generated in the implants. The most stressed region for the o-ring abutment was the threads, and the group with two implants showed the lowest stress concentration. Conclusions: In cases of Kennedy Class II, the association of RPD with implants in the molar region is a favorable option for patient rehabilitation, reducing the movement of the direct retainer adjacent to the edentulous space, increasing the removal force and decreasing the stress magnitude in the periodontal ligament.en
dc.description.affiliationDepartment of Dental Materials and Proshodontics São Paulo State University (Unesp) Institute of Science and Technology
dc.description.affiliationSão Paulo State University (Unesp) Institute of Science and Technology
dc.description.affiliationUnespDepartment of Dental Materials and Proshodontics São Paulo State University (Unesp) Institute of Science and Technology
dc.description.affiliationUnespSão Paulo State University (Unesp) Institute of Science and Technology
dc.format.extente38-e45
dc.identifierhttp://dx.doi.org/10.4317/MEDORAL.56533
dc.identifier.citationJournal of Clinical and Experimental Dentistry, v. 12, n. 1, p. e38-e45, 2020.
dc.identifier.doi10.4317/MEDORAL.56533
dc.identifier.issn1989-5488
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85084202947
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11449/198794
dc.language.isoeng
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of Clinical and Experimental Dentistry
dc.sourceScopus
dc.subjectDistal extension RPD considerations
dc.subjectFinite element analysis
dc.subjectImplant-assisted RPD
dc.subjectProsthetic dentistry
dc.subjectRemovable partial denture
dc.titleMechanical behavior of implant assisted removable partial denture for Kennedy class IIen
dc.typeArtigo
dspace.entity.typePublication

Arquivos

Coleções