Logotipo do repositório
 

Publicação:
Functional Resistance Training Superiority Over Conventional Training in Metabolic Syndrome: A Randomized Clinical Trial

dc.contributor.authorTurri-Silva, Natália
dc.contributor.authorRicci-Vitor, Ana Laura [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorCipriano Jr, Gerson
dc.contributor.authorGarner, David
dc.contributor.authorNetto, Jaime [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorGiacon, Thaís [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorDestro Christofaro, Diego Giulliano [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorMarques Vanderlei, Luiz Carlos
dc.contributor.institutionUniversity of Brasilia
dc.contributor.institutionHasselt University
dc.contributor.institutionUniversidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)
dc.contributor.institutionOxford Brookes University
dc.date.accessioned2020-12-12T01:13:31Z
dc.date.available2020-12-12T01:13:31Z
dc.date.issued2020-07-02
dc.description.abstractMetabolic syndrome (MetS) is a growing epidemic related with higher values of blood pressure (BP) and autonomic dysfunction. Scientific evidence has been indicating that functional resistance training (FRT) is superior over conventional (CRT) for muscle fatigue and pain, yet its effects on autonomic modulation (AM), BP and heart rate in MetS are unclear. We theorized that FRT can be superior to CRT in MetS patients because of larger muscle activation. This study compares FRT and CRT on AM, blood pressure, heart rate and muscle strength. Thirty-eight sex and age matched individuals (40 to 60 years) were randomized for FRT or CRT, with training intensity varying gradually from 30%–100% of one maximal repetition test (1MR), 3 times/week for 30 sessions. All outcomes were evaluated at baseline and post training. AM was assessed by heart rate variability (mean RR, RMSSD, SDNN, LF, HF, TINN, RRtri, SD1 and SD2). BP (mmHg) was obtained by cuff measures. Muscle strength was assessed by 1MR. An increase in cardiac parasympathetic activity was observed in individuals allocated to FRT in comparison to CRT group (RMSSD ∆40%; SD1 ∆39%; and HF ms2 ∆80%). Moreover, just FRT was capable of reducing BP post intervention (SBP from 129.21 ± 19.02 to 118.94 ± 14.14 mmHg, p < .009,/d/ = 0.49; DBP from 85.26 ± 11.48 to 77.76 ± 8.93 mmHg, p < .01,/d/ = 0.51). Both groups had a similar increase in muscle strength and no changes between HR. Progressive FRT was more beneficial to CRT regarding AM, increasing vagal activity, and reducing blood pressure in MetS individuals.en
dc.description.affiliationUniversity of Brasilia
dc.description.affiliationHasselt University
dc.description.affiliationSão Paulo State University (UNESP)
dc.description.affiliationOxford Brookes University
dc.description.affiliationUnespSão Paulo State University (UNESP)
dc.format.extent415-424
dc.identifierhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02701367.2019.1679333
dc.identifier.citationResearch Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, v. 91, n. 3, p. 415-424, 2020.
dc.identifier.doi10.1080/02701367.2019.1679333
dc.identifier.issn2168-3824
dc.identifier.issn0270-1367
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85078609279
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11449/198461
dc.language.isoeng
dc.relation.ispartofResearch Quarterly for Exercise and Sport
dc.sourceScopus
dc.subjectautonomic modulation
dc.subjectblood pressure
dc.subjectexercise therapy
dc.subjectMetabolic syndrome
dc.subjectresistance training
dc.titleFunctional Resistance Training Superiority Over Conventional Training in Metabolic Syndrome: A Randomized Clinical Trialen
dc.typeArtigo
dspace.entity.typePublication
unesp.author.orcid0000-0001-8550-6526[1]
unesp.author.orcid0000-0002-3654-8532[2]
unesp.author.orcid0000-0001-6323-7003[3]
unesp.author.orcid0000-0002-8114-9055[4]
unesp.author.orcid0000-0002-8307-6830[6]
unesp.author.orcid0000-0001-9917-9992[7]
unesp.author.orcid0000-0002-1891-3153[8]

Arquivos

Coleções