Logo do repositório

Effects of vaccination against foot-and-mouth disease virus on reproductive performance of Bos indicus beef cows

dc.contributor.authorFerreira, L. C. L.
dc.contributor.authorCooke, R. F. [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorMarques, R. S.
dc.contributor.authorFernandes, H. J.
dc.contributor.authorFernandes, C. E.
dc.contributor.authorStelato, R.
dc.contributor.authorFranco, G. L.
dc.contributor.authorLemos, R. A. A.
dc.contributor.institutionUniversidade Federal de Mato Grosso do Sul (UFMS)
dc.contributor.institutionOregon State Univ
dc.contributor.institutionUniversidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)
dc.contributor.institutionUniversidade Estadual de Mato Grosso do Sul (UEMS)
dc.contributor.institutionLab Zoetis Ltda
dc.date.accessioned2018-11-26T15:28:44Z
dc.date.available2018-11-26T15:28:44Z
dc.date.issued2016-01-01
dc.description.abstractThis study compared reproductive performance of Bos indicus cows vaccinated against the foot-and-mouth disease (FMD) virus before timed AI or during early pregnancy (Exp. 1), as well as rectal temperature (RT) and plasma concentrations of the acute-phase protein haptoglobin in cattle vaccinated or not against the FMD virus (Exp. 2). Cattle utilized in Exp. 1 and 2 originated from herds with no historical occurrences of FMD and that received vaccination against the FMD virus biannually. In Exp. 1, 604 lactating, multiparous, nonpregnant Nelore cows were randomly assigned on d -31 of the experiment to receive 1) vaccination against the FMD virus on d >= 31 (VACPRE; n = 291) and 2) vaccination against FMD virus on d 30 (VACGEST; n = 313). From d -11 to 0, all cows were assigned to an estrus synchronization + timed AI (d 0) protocol. Pregnancy status to AI was verified on d 30 and 90 via transrectal ultrasonography. A treatment x day interaction was detected (P < 0.01) for pregnancy rates to AI, which were similar (P = 0.17) between VACPRE and VACGEST on d 30 (61.8% vs. 56.2%, respectively; SEM = 2.8) but greater (P < 0.01) for VACPRE on d 90 (59.4% vs. 46.9%, respectively; SEM = 2.8). Pregnancy loss from d 30 to 90 was greater (P < 0.01) in VACGEST compared with VACPRE (16.5% vs. 3.9%, respectively; SEM = 2.2). In Exp. 2, 40 pregnant Nelore females (20 nulliparous and 20 multiparous cows; BCS = 4.73 +/- 0.12) were ranked by parity and assigned to receive (VAC; n = 20) or not receive (NOVAC; n = 20) vaccination against the FMD virus. Blood samples were collected and RT was recorded before (h 0) and 24, 72, 120, and 168 h after treatment administration. Treatment x day interactions were detected (P < 0.01) for RT and plasma haptoglobin. The RT was greater (P < 0.01) in VAC compared with NOVAC at 24 h after treatment administration and was similar (P = 0.31) between treatments at all other sampling hours. Plasma haptoglobin concentration was similar (P = 0.98) between VAC and NOVAC before treatment administration (P = 0.48) and greater (P < 0.01) in VAC at 24, 72, 120, and 168 h after treatment administration. In summary, vaccinating B. indicus beef cows against the FMD virus resulted in a 4-fold increase in pregnancy loss when the vaccine was administered 30 d after timed AI compared with 31 d before timed AI. These outcomes can be associated with inflammatory and acute-phase reactions elicited by the FMD vaccine, which are known to impair pregnancy maintenance in cattle.en
dc.description.affiliationUniv Fed Mato Grosso do Sul, Fac Med Vet & Zootecnia, BR-79074460 Campo Grande, Brazil
dc.description.affiliationOregon State Univ, Eastern Oregon Agr Res Ctr, Burns, OR 97720 USA
dc.description.affiliationUniv Estadual Paulista, Programa Posgrad Zootecnia, Fac Med Vet & Zootecnia, BR-18618970 Botucatu, SP, Brazil
dc.description.affiliationUniv Estadual Mato Grosso do Sul, Unidade Univ Aquidauana, BR-79200000 Aquidauana, Brazil
dc.description.affiliationUniv Fed Mato Grosso do Sul, Ctr Ciencias Biol & Saude, BR-79074460 Campo Grande, Brazil
dc.description.affiliationLab Zoetis Ltda, BR-79074460 Campo Grande, Brazil
dc.description.affiliationUnespUniv Estadual Paulista, Programa Posgrad Zootecnia, Fac Med Vet & Zootecnia, BR-18618970 Botucatu, SP, Brazil
dc.format.extent401-405
dc.identifierhttp://dx.doi.org/10.2527/jas2015-9537
dc.identifier.citationJournal Of Animal Science. Champaign: Amer Soc Animal Science, v. 94, n. 1, p. 401-405, 2016.
dc.identifier.doi10.2527/jas2015-9537
dc.identifier.fileWOS000370375600040.pdf
dc.identifier.issn0021-8812
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11449/158709
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000370375600040
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherAmer Soc Animal Science
dc.relation.ispartofJournal Of Animal Science
dc.relation.ispartofsjr0,848
dc.rights.accessRightsAcesso abertopt
dc.sourceWeb of Science
dc.subjectacute-phase response
dc.subjectbeef cattle
dc.subjectfoot-and-mouth disease
dc.subjectinflammation
dc.subjectpregnancy loss
dc.titleEffects of vaccination against foot-and-mouth disease virus on reproductive performance of Bos indicus beef cowsen
dc.typeArtigopt
dcterms.rightsHolderAmer Soc Animal Science
dspace.entity.typePublication
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublicationa3cdb24b-db92-40d9-b3af-2eacecf9f2ba
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublication.latestForDiscoverya3cdb24b-db92-40d9-b3af-2eacecf9f2ba
unesp.campusUniversidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP), Faculdade de Medicina, Botucatupt

Arquivos

Pacote original

Agora exibindo 1 - 1 de 1
Carregando...
Imagem de Miniatura
Nome:
WOS000370375600040.pdf
Tamanho:
322.9 KB
Formato:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Descrição: