Atenção!


O atendimento às questões referentes ao Repositório Institucional será interrompido entre os dias 20 de dezembro de 2025 a 4 de janeiro de 2026.

Pedimos a sua compreensão e aproveitamos para desejar boas festas!

Logo do repositório

Comparative analysis of life cycle assessment and material circularity indicator: study applied to smart electricity meter polycarbonate parts

dc.contributor.authorMartins, Mariane Guerra
dc.contributor.authorNunes, Andrea Oliveira
dc.contributor.authorMancini, Sandro Donnini [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorBelli, Cristina
dc.contributor.authorRocha, Tiago Barreto
dc.contributor.authorMoris, Virginia Aparecida Silva
dc.contributor.institutionUniversidade Federal de São Carlos (UFSCar)
dc.contributor.institutionFederal University of Rio Grande Do Norte
dc.contributor.institutionUniversidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
dc.contributor.institutionSinctronics Innovation and Sustainability Center
dc.contributor.institutionACV Brasil
dc.date.accessioned2025-04-29T20:15:18Z
dc.date.issued2024-11-01
dc.description.abstractThere is growing interest in metrics for developing circular and sustainable products. Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) and the Material Circularity Indicator (MCI) are prominent for analyzing environmental performance and product circularity, respectively. This study compares these methodologies applied to a case of plastic parts made from virgin Polycarbonate + 10% Fiber Glass for smart electricity meters. Sensitivity analyses were conducted on the recycled content used and the final treatment of parts. Both methodologies are sensitive to recycled content usage. The best scenario (SA1-10) features 100% recycled content and full recycling of parts, while the worst scenario (SA2-1) uses 100% virgin content with all parts disposed of in landfills. The results highlight similarities and differences between the methodologies. MCI focuses on material source, life extension, and end-of-life treatment to measure circularity. LCA covers a broader range of impact categories, including resource use, human health, and ecosystem impacts, making it more comprehensive for environmental analysis. Both emphasize the importance of recycled content and end-of-life treatment, underscoring the benefits of recycling in reducing environmental impacts and enhancing circularity.en
dc.description.affiliationFederal University of São Carlos, Campus Sorocaba, Rod. João Leme Dos Santos, Km 110 (SP-264) Bairro Do Itinga, CEP
dc.description.affiliationFederal University of Rio Grande Do Norte
dc.description.affiliationInstitute of Science and Technology São Paulo State University (Unesp)
dc.description.affiliationSinctronics Innovation and Sustainability Center
dc.description.affiliationACV Brasil
dc.description.affiliationUnespInstitute of Science and Technology São Paulo State University (Unesp)
dc.format.extent3777-3786
dc.identifierhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10163-024-02077-4
dc.identifier.citationJournal of Material Cycles and Waste Management, v. 26, n. 6, p. 3777-3786, 2024.
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/s10163-024-02077-4
dc.identifier.issn1611-8227
dc.identifier.issn1438-4957
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85205934401
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11449/309402
dc.language.isoeng
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of Material Cycles and Waste Management
dc.sourceScopus
dc.subjectCircular economy
dc.subjectLife cycle assessment
dc.subjectMaterial circularity indicator
dc.subjectPolycarbonate
dc.subjectSmart electricity meters
dc.titleComparative analysis of life cycle assessment and material circularity indicator: study applied to smart electricity meter polycarbonate partsen
dc.typeArtigopt
dspace.entity.typePublication
unesp.author.orcid0000-0001-6792-0344[1]
unesp.author.orcid0000-0003-0021-6621[2]
unesp.author.orcid0000-0002-4287-1969[3]
unesp.author.orcid0000-0002-5968-836X[4]
unesp.author.orcid0000-0002-6445-8315[5]
unesp.author.orcid0000-0002-6374-1792[6]

Arquivos

Coleções