Logo do repositório

Combination of a Synthetic Bioceramic Associated with a Polydioxanone-Based Membrane as an Alternative to Autogenous Bone Grafting

dc.contributor.authorFrigério, Paula Buzo [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorde Moura, Juliana [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorPitol-Palin, Letícia [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorMonteiro, Naara Gabriela [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorMourão, Carlos Fernando
dc.contributor.authorShibli, Jamil Awad
dc.contributor.authorOkamoto, Roberta [UNESP]
dc.contributor.institutionUniversidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
dc.contributor.institutionTufts University School of Dental Medicine
dc.contributor.institutionGuarulhos University
dc.date.accessioned2025-04-29T20:12:20Z
dc.date.issued2024-05-01
dc.description.abstractThe purpose of this study was to evaluate the repair process in rat calvaria filled with synthetic biphasic bioceramics (Plenum® Osshp-70:30, HA:βTCP) or autogenous bone, covered with a polydioxanone membrane (PDO). A total of 48 rats were divided into two groups (n = 24): particulate autogenous bone + Plenum® Guide (AUTOPT+PG) or Plenum® Osshp + Plenum® Guide (PO+PG). A defect was created in the calvaria, filled with the grafts, and covered with a PDO membrane, and euthanasia took place at 7, 30, and 60 days. Micro-CT showed no statistical difference between the groups, but there was an increase in bone volume (56.26%), the number of trabeculae (2.76 mm), and intersection surface (26.76 mm2) and a decrease in total porosity (43.79%) in the PO+PG group, as well as higher values for the daily mineral apposition rate (7.16 µm/day). Histometric analysis presented material replacement and increased bone formation at 30 days compared to 7 days in both groups. Immunostaining showed a similar pattern between the groups, with an increase in proteins related to bone remodeling and formation. In conclusion, Plenum® Osshp + Plenum® Guide showed similar and sometimes superior results when compared to autogenous bone, making it a competent option as a bone substitute.en
dc.description.affiliationDepartment of Diagnosis and Surgery São Paulo State University (UNESP) School of Dentistry
dc.description.affiliationDepartment of Periodontology Tufts University School of Dental Medicine
dc.description.affiliationDepartment of Periodontology Dental Research Division Guarulhos University
dc.description.affiliationDepartment of Basic Sciences São Paulo State University (UNESP) School of Dentistry
dc.description.affiliationUnespDepartment of Diagnosis and Surgery São Paulo State University (UNESP) School of Dentistry
dc.description.affiliationUnespDepartment of Basic Sciences São Paulo State University (UNESP) School of Dentistry
dc.identifierhttp://dx.doi.org/10.3390/biomimetics9050284
dc.identifier.citationBiomimetics, v. 9, n. 5, 2024.
dc.identifier.doi10.3390/biomimetics9050284
dc.identifier.issn2313-7673
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85194086033
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11449/308394
dc.language.isoeng
dc.relation.ispartofBiomimetics
dc.sourceScopus
dc.subjectbioceramics
dc.subjectbone grafting
dc.subjectbone substitutes
dc.subjectguided bone regeneration
dc.subjectguided tissue regeneration
dc.subjectsynthetic polymer
dc.titleCombination of a Synthetic Bioceramic Associated with a Polydioxanone-Based Membrane as an Alternative to Autogenous Bone Graftingen
dc.typeArtigopt
dspace.entity.typePublication
unesp.author.orcid0000-0002-5012-5093[1]
unesp.author.orcid0000-0003-4765-3765[3]
unesp.author.orcid0000-0002-2857-9195[4]
unesp.author.orcid0000-0001-5775-0222[5]
unesp.author.orcid0000-0003-1971-0195[6]
unesp.author.orcid0000-0002-6773-6966[7]

Arquivos

Coleções