Logo do repositório

In vitro evaluation of microbial adhesion on the different surface roughness of acrylic resin specific for ocular prosthesis

dc.contributor.authorAndreotti, Agda Marobo [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorDe Sousa, Cecília Alves [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorGoiato, Marcelo Coelho [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorda Silva, Emily Vivianne Freitas [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorDuque, Cristiane [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorMoreno, Amália
dc.contributor.authorDos Santos, Daniela Micheline [UNESP]
dc.contributor.institutionUniversidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)
dc.contributor.institutionUniversidade Federal de Minas Gerais (UFMG)
dc.date.accessioned2018-12-11T17:20:40Z
dc.date.available2018-12-11T17:20:40Z
dc.date.issued2018-04-01
dc.description.abstractObjective: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the influence of surface roughness in biofilm formation of four microorganisms (Staphylococcus epidermidis, Staphylococcus aureus, Enterococcus faecalis, and Candida albicans) on acrylic resin surface of ocular prostheses. Materials and Methods: Acrylic resin samples were divided into six groups according to polishing: Group 1200S (1200 grit + silica solution); Group 1200; Group 800; Group 400; Group 120 and Group unpolished. Surface roughness was measured using a profilometer and surface images obtained with atomic force microscopy. Microbial growth was evaluated after 4, 24, and 48 hours of incubation by counting colony-forming units. Statistical Analysis Used: For roughness, it was performed 1-way ANOVA and parametric Tukey test α5% (P ≤ 0.05). For CFU data found, it was applied Kruskal-Wallis and Mann-Whitney tests. Results: Group 120 and 400 presented the highest roughness values. For S. epidermidis and S. aureus, Group 1200S presented the lowest values of microbial growth. For E. faecalis at 4 hour, microbial growth was not observed. C. albicans did not adhere to the acrylic resin. Except for Group 1200S, different surface roughnesses did not statistically interfere with microbial adhesion and growth on acrylic surfaces of ocular prostheses. Conclusions: The roughness did not interfere with the microbial adhesion of the microorganisms evaluated. The use of silica decreases significantly microbial growth.en
dc.description.affiliationDepartment of Dental Materials and Prosthodontics Aracatuba Dental School Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
dc.description.affiliationBucal Oncology Center Aracatuba Dental School Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
dc.description.affiliationDepartment of Pediatric Dentistry Aracatuba Dental School Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
dc.description.affiliationDepartment of Oral Surgery and Pathology School of Dentistry Federal University of Minas Gerais
dc.description.affiliationUnespDepartment of Dental Materials and Prosthodontics Aracatuba Dental School Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
dc.description.affiliationUnespBucal Oncology Center Aracatuba Dental School Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
dc.description.affiliationUnespDepartment of Pediatric Dentistry Aracatuba Dental School Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
dc.format.extent176-183
dc.identifierhttp://dx.doi.org/10.4103/ejd.ejd_50_18
dc.identifier.citationEuropean Journal of Dentistry, v. 12, n. 2, p. 176-183, 2018.
dc.identifier.doi10.4103/ejd.ejd_50_18
dc.identifier.file2-s2.0-85048091215.pdf
dc.identifier.issn1305-7464
dc.identifier.issn1305-7456
dc.identifier.lattes9719883814872582
dc.identifier.lattes5651874509493617
dc.identifier.orcid0000-0002-2575-279X
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85048091215
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11449/176404
dc.language.isoeng
dc.relation.ispartofEuropean Journal of Dentistry
dc.relation.ispartofsjr0,749
dc.relation.ispartofsjr0,749
dc.rights.accessRightsAcesso abertopt
dc.sourceScopus
dc.subjectAcrylic resin
dc.subjectBiofilm
dc.subjectMicrobial adhesion
dc.subjectOcular prosthesis
dc.titleIn vitro evaluation of microbial adhesion on the different surface roughness of acrylic resin specific for ocular prosthesisen
dc.typeArtigopt
dspace.entity.typePublication
relation.isDepartmentOfPublication5f53b343-da2a-4737-96ec-6e2389a6d704
relation.isDepartmentOfPublication.latestForDiscovery5f53b343-da2a-4737-96ec-6e2389a6d704
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublication8b3335a4-1163-438a-a0e2-921a46e0380d
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublication.latestForDiscovery8b3335a4-1163-438a-a0e2-921a46e0380d
unesp.author.lattes9719883814872582
unesp.author.lattes5651874509493617[5]
unesp.author.orcid0000-0002-2575-279X[5]
unesp.campusUniversidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP), Faculdade de Odontologia, Araçatubapt
unesp.departmentMateriais odontológicos e Prótese - FOApt
unesp.departmentOdontologia Infantil e Social - FOApt

Arquivos

Pacote original

Agora exibindo 1 - 1 de 1
Carregando...
Imagem de Miniatura
Nome:
2-s2.0-85048091215.pdf
Tamanho:
1.1 MB
Formato:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Descrição: