Logo do repositório

Dicamba: Dynamics in Straw (Maize) and Weed Control Effectiveness

dc.contributor.authorMundt, Tamara Thais [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorGimenes Cotrick Gomes, Giovanna Larissa
dc.contributor.authorPicoli Junior, Gilmar José
dc.contributor.authorLopez Ovejero, Ramiro Fernando
dc.contributor.authorDomingues Velini, Edivaldo [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorCarbonari, Caio Antonio [UNESP]
dc.contributor.institutionUniversidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
dc.contributor.institutionBioativa-Pesquisas Estratégicas em Biociências
dc.contributor.institutionRegulatory Science
dc.date.accessioned2025-04-29T20:11:26Z
dc.date.issued2024-10-01
dc.description.abstractDicamba is a post-herbicide, showing some activity in soil, and its dynamics can be influenced by several factors, including the presence of straw. Brazil has more than 50% of its production area in a no-till system; thus, a good amount of the herbicide is intercepted by the straw. This study aimed to evaluate dicamba dynamics in straw and weed control efficacy when sprayed as a PRE herbicide. For this, five different studies were conducted: we utilized different straw amounts (1) and different drought periods (2) for straw sprayed with dicamba and dicamba + glyphosate to evaluate its release from straw, different straw amounts (3), different drought periods (4), and wet and dry straw (5) to evaluate pre-emergence weed control (Bidens pilosa and Ipomoea grandifolia) and dicamba availability in medium-texture soil. Around 80% of dicamba was released from the straw after 100 mm of rainfall. One day after dicamba application, 65–70% of dicamba was released from the straw with 20 mm of rainfall, while for 7 and 14 DAA, 60% was released. Dicamba was efficient in controlling the pre-emergence of both species studied, and the amount of straw did not interfere in weed control; however, dicamba was less available in the soil after rainfall when sprayed in the straw than when sprayed directly in the soil. Up to 80% of dicamba can be released from the straw after 100 mm of rainfall and weed control was efficient for the species studied; however, the carryover effect in sensitive crops might become an issue.en
dc.description.affiliationDepartment of Crop Science College of Agricultural Sciences Sao Paulo State University, SP
dc.description.affiliationBioativa-Pesquisas Estratégicas em Biociências, SP
dc.description.affiliationRegulatory Science, Bayer CropScience, Santa Cruz das Palmeiras, SP
dc.description.affiliationRegulatory Science, Bayer CropScience, SP
dc.description.affiliationPlant Protection College of Agricultural Sciences Sao Paulo State University, SP
dc.description.affiliationUnespDepartment of Crop Science College of Agricultural Sciences Sao Paulo State University, SP
dc.description.affiliationUnespPlant Protection College of Agricultural Sciences Sao Paulo State University, SP
dc.identifierhttp://dx.doi.org/10.3390/agronomy14102294
dc.identifier.citationAgronomy, v. 14, n. 10, 2024.
dc.identifier.doi10.3390/agronomy14102294
dc.identifier.issn2073-4395
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85207350586
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11449/308166
dc.language.isoeng
dc.relation.ispartofAgronomy
dc.sourceScopus
dc.subjectBidens pilosa
dc.subjectchemical control
dc.subjectenvironmental behavior
dc.subjectIpomoea grandifolia
dc.subjectLCMSMS
dc.subjectno-till system
dc.subjectsynthetic auxin herbicides
dc.titleDicamba: Dynamics in Straw (Maize) and Weed Control Effectivenessen
dc.typeArtigopt
dspace.entity.typePublication
unesp.author.orcid0000-0003-3880-0209[3]
unesp.author.orcid0000-0002-0383-2529[6]

Arquivos

Coleções