Dicamba: Dynamics in Straw (Maize) and Weed Control Effectiveness
| dc.contributor.author | Mundt, Tamara Thais [UNESP] | |
| dc.contributor.author | Gimenes Cotrick Gomes, Giovanna Larissa | |
| dc.contributor.author | Picoli Junior, Gilmar José | |
| dc.contributor.author | Lopez Ovejero, Ramiro Fernando | |
| dc.contributor.author | Domingues Velini, Edivaldo [UNESP] | |
| dc.contributor.author | Carbonari, Caio Antonio [UNESP] | |
| dc.contributor.institution | Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) | |
| dc.contributor.institution | Bioativa-Pesquisas Estratégicas em Biociências | |
| dc.contributor.institution | Regulatory Science | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2025-04-29T20:11:26Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2024-10-01 | |
| dc.description.abstract | Dicamba is a post-herbicide, showing some activity in soil, and its dynamics can be influenced by several factors, including the presence of straw. Brazil has more than 50% of its production area in a no-till system; thus, a good amount of the herbicide is intercepted by the straw. This study aimed to evaluate dicamba dynamics in straw and weed control efficacy when sprayed as a PRE herbicide. For this, five different studies were conducted: we utilized different straw amounts (1) and different drought periods (2) for straw sprayed with dicamba and dicamba + glyphosate to evaluate its release from straw, different straw amounts (3), different drought periods (4), and wet and dry straw (5) to evaluate pre-emergence weed control (Bidens pilosa and Ipomoea grandifolia) and dicamba availability in medium-texture soil. Around 80% of dicamba was released from the straw after 100 mm of rainfall. One day after dicamba application, 65–70% of dicamba was released from the straw with 20 mm of rainfall, while for 7 and 14 DAA, 60% was released. Dicamba was efficient in controlling the pre-emergence of both species studied, and the amount of straw did not interfere in weed control; however, dicamba was less available in the soil after rainfall when sprayed in the straw than when sprayed directly in the soil. Up to 80% of dicamba can be released from the straw after 100 mm of rainfall and weed control was efficient for the species studied; however, the carryover effect in sensitive crops might become an issue. | en |
| dc.description.affiliation | Department of Crop Science College of Agricultural Sciences Sao Paulo State University, SP | |
| dc.description.affiliation | Bioativa-Pesquisas Estratégicas em Biociências, SP | |
| dc.description.affiliation | Regulatory Science, Bayer CropScience, Santa Cruz das Palmeiras, SP | |
| dc.description.affiliation | Regulatory Science, Bayer CropScience, SP | |
| dc.description.affiliation | Plant Protection College of Agricultural Sciences Sao Paulo State University, SP | |
| dc.description.affiliationUnesp | Department of Crop Science College of Agricultural Sciences Sao Paulo State University, SP | |
| dc.description.affiliationUnesp | Plant Protection College of Agricultural Sciences Sao Paulo State University, SP | |
| dc.identifier | http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/agronomy14102294 | |
| dc.identifier.citation | Agronomy, v. 14, n. 10, 2024. | |
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.3390/agronomy14102294 | |
| dc.identifier.issn | 2073-4395 | |
| dc.identifier.scopus | 2-s2.0-85207350586 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/11449/308166 | |
| dc.language.iso | eng | |
| dc.relation.ispartof | Agronomy | |
| dc.source | Scopus | |
| dc.subject | Bidens pilosa | |
| dc.subject | chemical control | |
| dc.subject | environmental behavior | |
| dc.subject | Ipomoea grandifolia | |
| dc.subject | LCMSMS | |
| dc.subject | no-till system | |
| dc.subject | synthetic auxin herbicides | |
| dc.title | Dicamba: Dynamics in Straw (Maize) and Weed Control Effectiveness | en |
| dc.type | Artigo | pt |
| dspace.entity.type | Publication | |
| unesp.author.orcid | 0000-0003-3880-0209[3] | |
| unesp.author.orcid | 0000-0002-0383-2529[6] |
