Logo do repositório

Efficacy of Antimicrobial Photodynamic Therapy for Treating Moderate to Deep Periodontal Pockets in Individuals with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

dc.contributor.authorRodrigues, João Victor Soares [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorDeroide, Mariella Boaretti [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorTakeshita, Wilton Mitsunari [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorGarcia, Valdir Gouveia
dc.contributor.authorde Molon, Rafael Scaf [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorTheodoro, Leticia Helena [UNESP]
dc.contributor.institutionUniversidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
dc.contributor.institutionLatin American Institute of Dental Research and Teaching (ILAPEO)
dc.date.accessioned2025-04-29T20:14:17Z
dc.date.issued2025-01-01
dc.description.abstractBackground/Objectives: Diabetes mellitus and periodontitis share a significant, bidirectional relationship. Diabetes raises the risk of periodontitis and influences its severity, impacting tissue repair and bone metabolism. Conversely, periodontal inflammation can disrupt glycemic control, further complicating this interlinked relationship. This systematic review aimed to evaluate the efficacy of antimicrobial photodynamic therapy (aPDT) as an adjunct to subgingival instrumentation (SI) in the treatment of periodontal pockets with a probing pocket depth (PPD) ≥ 5 mm in individuals with type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM2) and periodontitis. Methods: Using the PICOS framework, this review addressed the following question: “How does aPDT as an adjunct to SI compare to SI alone in treating periodontal pockets with PPD ≥ 5 mm in individuals with DM2 and periodontitis?” Databases searched included PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science up to December 2024. Randomized clinical trials evaluating periodontal status and HbA1c levels in patients with DM2 undergoing periodontal therapy and experiencing SI were included. Patients who received adjunctive aPDT were compared to a control group that received SI alone. A meta-analysis was conducted illustrating treatment effects across groups. Results: After screening 117 studies based on titles and abstracts, three and four studies met the eligibility criteria for quantitative and qualitative analyses, respectively. The principal periodontal parameters assessed included PPD, clinical attachment level (CAL), plaque index (PI), and bleeding on probing (BOP). Forest plots for PD, BOP, PI, and CAL at baseline, three months, and six months revealed no statistically significant differences between the SI+aPDT group and the SI-only group. Glycated hemoglobin across treatment groups was not different. Conclusions: The combination of aPDT with SI provides limited clinical benefits in treating periodontal pockets with a PPD ≥ 5 mm in diabetic patients with periodontitis.en
dc.description.affiliationDepartment of Diagnosis and Surgery School of Dentistry São Paulo State University (UNESP), SP
dc.description.affiliationLatin American Institute of Dental Research and Teaching (ILAPEO), PR
dc.description.affiliationUnespDepartment of Diagnosis and Surgery School of Dentistry São Paulo State University (UNESP), SP
dc.identifierhttp://dx.doi.org/10.3390/dj13010021
dc.identifier.citationDentistry Journal, v. 13, n. 1, 2025.
dc.identifier.doi10.3390/dj13010021
dc.identifier.issn2304-6767
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85215680744
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11449/309041
dc.language.isoeng
dc.relation.ispartofDentistry Journal
dc.sourceScopus
dc.subjectdiabetes mellitus
dc.subjectperiodontal disease
dc.subjectperiodontal pocket
dc.subjectphotochemotherapy
dc.subjectphotosensitizing agents
dc.titleEfficacy of Antimicrobial Photodynamic Therapy for Treating Moderate to Deep Periodontal Pockets in Individuals with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysisen
dc.typeResenhapt
dspace.entity.typePublication
unesp.author.orcid0000-0002-6715-8334[4]
unesp.author.orcid0000-0003-1110-6233[5]
unesp.author.orcid0000-0003-3026-8369[6]

Arquivos

Coleções