Logo do repositório
 

Evaluation of different treatment methods against denture stomatitis: a randomized clinical study

dc.contributor.authorTay, Lidia Yileng
dc.contributor.authorJorge, Janaina Habib [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorHerrera, Daniel Rodrigo
dc.contributor.authorCampanha, Nara Hellen
dc.contributor.authorGomes, Brenda Paula
dc.contributor.authorSantos, Fabio Andre dos
dc.contributor.institutionUniversidade Estadual de Ponta Grossa (UEPG)
dc.contributor.institutionUniversidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)
dc.contributor.institutionUniversidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP)
dc.date.accessioned2014-12-03T13:10:49Z
dc.date.available2014-12-03T13:10:49Z
dc.date.issued2014-07-01
dc.description.abstractObjective. The aim of this clinical study was to determine the efficacy of Uncaria tomentosa (cat's claw) against denture stomatitis (DS).Study Design. Fifty patients with DS were randomly assigned into 3 groups to receive 2% miconazole, placebo, or 2% U tomentosa gel. DS level was recorded immediately, after 1 week of treatment, and 1 week after treatment. The clinical effectiveness of each treatment was measured using Newton's criteria. Mycologic samples from palatal mucosa and prosthesis were obtained to determinate colony forming units per milliliter (CFU/mL) and fungal identification at each evaluation period.Results. Candida species were identified with HiCrome Candida and API 20C AUX biochemical test. DS severity decreased in all groups (P < .05). A significant reduction in number of CFU/mL after 1 week (P < .05) was observed for all groups and remained after 14 days (P > .05). C albicans was the most prevalent microorganism before treatment, followed by C tropicalis, C glabrata, and C krusei, regardless of the group and time evaluated. U tomentosa gel had the same effect as 2% miconazole gel.Conclusions. U tomentosa gel is an effective topical adjuvant treatment for denture stomatitis.en
dc.description.affiliationPonta Grossa State Univ UEPG, Dept Dent, Ponta Grossa, Parana, Brazil
dc.description.affiliationUNESP Univ Estadual Paulista, Araraquara Dent Sch, Dept Dent Mat & Prosthodont, Sao Paulo, Brazil
dc.description.affiliationUniv Campinas UNICAMP, Piracicaba Dent Sch, Dept Restorat Dent, Endodont Div, Sao Paulo, Brazil
dc.description.affiliationUnespUNESP Univ Estadual Paulista, Araraquara Dent Sch, Dept Dent Mat & Prosthodont, Sao Paulo, Brazil
dc.format.extent72-77
dc.identifierhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.oooo.2014.03.017
dc.identifier.citationOral Surgery Oral Medicine Oral Pathology Oral Radiology. New York: Elsevier Science Inc, v. 118, n. 1, p. 72-77, 2014.
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.oooo.2014.03.017
dc.identifier.issn2212-4403
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11449/112541
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000338192600015
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherElsevier B.V.
dc.relation.ispartofOral Surgery Oral Medicine Oral Pathology Oral Radiology
dc.relation.ispartofjcr1.718
dc.relation.ispartofsjr0,720
dc.rights.accessRightsAcesso restritopt
dc.sourceWeb of Science
dc.titleEvaluation of different treatment methods against denture stomatitis: a randomized clinical studyen
dc.typeArtigopt
dcterms.licensehttp://www.elsevier.com/about/open-access/open-access-policies/article-posting-policy
dcterms.rightsHolderElsevier B.V.
dspace.entity.typePublication
relation.isDepartmentOfPublication3936e2e2-946a-42ab-8b9d-9521513200fc
relation.isDepartmentOfPublication.latestForDiscovery3936e2e2-946a-42ab-8b9d-9521513200fc
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublicationca4c0298-cd82-48ee-a9c8-c97704bac2b0
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublication.latestForDiscoveryca4c0298-cd82-48ee-a9c8-c97704bac2b0
unesp.author.orcid0000-0002-8952-1202[3]
unesp.author.orcid0000-0002-9135-3455[2]
unesp.author.orcid0000-0002-8449-0646[5]
unesp.campusUniversidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP), Faculdade de Odontologia, Araraquarapt
unesp.departmentMateriais Odontológicos e Prótese - FOARpt

Arquivos