Logotipo do repositório
 

Publicação:
Scanning electron microscopy analysis of RinsEndo system and conventional irrigation for debris removal

dc.contributor.authorVivan, Rodrigo Ricci [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorBortolo, Melina Vieira
dc.contributor.authorDuarte, Marco Antonio Hungaro
dc.contributor.authorde Moraes, Ivaldo Gomes
dc.contributor.authorTanomaru-Filho, Mario [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorBramante, Clovis Monteiro
dc.contributor.institutionUniversidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)
dc.contributor.institutionUniversidade de São Paulo (USP)
dc.date.accessioned2014-05-27T11:24:50Z
dc.date.available2014-05-27T11:24:50Z
dc.date.issued2010-11-30
dc.description.abstractA new device for irrigation, which presents hydrodynamic activation based on the pressure-suction technology, has recently been introduced to the market: the Rinsendo system. This study compared the efficacy of the Rinsendo system and conventional (manualdynamic) irrigation in the removal of debris from the root canal walls, using scanning electron microscopy (SEM). Twenty mandibular premolars with completely formed roots were selected and randomly divided into group 1 (irrigation with the Rinsendo system) and group 2 (conventional irrigation). The canals were irrigated with 1 ml of saline at each change of instrument. instrumentation started with a #15 K file and continued up to a #40 K file, which was standardized as the working length instrument. Then, the teeth were sectioned in buccolingual direction and the halves were sputter-coated with gold and examined by SEM. The apical, middle and cervical root canal thirds were evaluated, and the results were analyzed statistically by the Mann-Whitney test for comparison between methods, Kruskal-Wallis test for comparison among thirds, and Miller test for individual comparisons. A significance level of 5% was set for all analyses. The results did not show significant differences (p>0.05) between methods at each third and among thirds for each technique analyzed individually. in conclusion, there was no difference in the cleaning ability of the Rinsendo system and conventional irrigation.en
dc.description.affiliationDepartment of Restorative Dentistry Araraquara Dental School São Paulo State University, Araraquara, SP
dc.description.affiliationDepartment of Endodontics Bauru Dental School University of São Paulo, Bauru, SP
dc.description.affiliationUnespDepartment of Restorative Dentistry Araraquara Dental School São Paulo State University, Araraquara, SP
dc.format.extent305-309
dc.identifierhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0103-64402010000400003
dc.identifier.citationBrazilian Dental Journal, v. 21, n. 4, p. 305-309, 2010.
dc.identifier.doi10.1590/S0103-64402010000400003
dc.identifier.file2-s2.0-78649368338.pdf
dc.identifier.issn0103-6440
dc.identifier.issn1806-4760
dc.identifier.scieloS0103-64402010000400003
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-78649368338
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11449/71975
dc.language.isoeng
dc.relation.ispartofBrazilian Dental Journal
dc.relation.ispartofsjr0,476
dc.rights.accessRightsAcesso aberto
dc.sourceScopus
dc.subjectEndodontics
dc.subjectIrrigation
dc.subjectRinsEndo system
dc.subjectbiomedical and dental materials
dc.subjectcomparative study
dc.subjectdental equipment
dc.subjectdental surgery
dc.subjectendodontics
dc.subjectevaluation
dc.subjecthuman
dc.subjectinstrumentation
dc.subjectlavage
dc.subjectmethodology
dc.subjecttooth pulp
dc.subjectultrastructure
dc.subjectDental Instruments
dc.subjectDental Pulp Cavity
dc.subjectHumans
dc.subjectRoot Canal Irrigants
dc.subjectRoot Canal Preparation
dc.subjectSmear Layer
dc.subjectTherapeutic Irrigation
dc.titleScanning electron microscopy analysis of RinsEndo system and conventional irrigation for debris removalen
dc.typeArtigo
dcterms.licensehttp://www.scielo.br/revistas/bdj/paboutj.htm
dspace.entity.typePublication
unesp.campusUniversidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP), Faculdade de Odontologia, Araraquarapt
unesp.departmentOdontologia Restauradora - FOARpt

Arquivos

Pacote Original

Agora exibindo 1 - 1 de 1
Carregando...
Imagem de Miniatura
Nome:
2-s2.0-78649368338.pdf
Tamanho:
497.69 KB
Formato:
Adobe Portable Document Format