Logotipo do repositório
 

Publicação:
A clinical comparison of 1-piece versus 2-piece implants: A systematic review and meta-analysis

dc.contributor.authorde Oliveira Limírio, João Pedro Justino [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorLemos, Cleidiel Aparecido Araújo [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorde Luna Gomes, Jéssica Marcela [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorMinatel, Lurian [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorAlves Rezende, Maria Cristina Rosifini [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorPellizzer, Eduardo Piza [UNESP]
dc.contributor.institutionUniversidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)
dc.date.accessioned2020-12-12T02:31:50Z
dc.date.available2020-12-12T02:31:50Z
dc.date.issued2019-01-01
dc.description.abstractStatement of problem: One-step dental implant surgery with a 1-piece implant has been introduced with the aim of simplifying and increasing the effectiveness of treatment and providing greater comfort for the patient. Whether these goals have been met compared with conventional 2-piece implants remains unclear. Purpose: The purpose of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to compare the use of 1-piece versus 2-piece implants in terms of marginal bone loss and implant survival rate. Material and methods: This systematic review and meta-analysis adhered to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines and was recorded in the International prospective register of systematic reviews (PROSPERO) database (CRD 42018095721). A literature search was conducted in the PubMed/MEDLINE, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library databases for articles published up to May 2018. The population, intervention, comparison, outcome (PICO) question was, “Do patients who received 1-piece implants show similar marginal bone loss, survival rates, and complications as those who receive 2-piece implants?” Results: The meta-analysis was based on the Mantel-Haenszel and inverse variance methods. Implant survival rate was analyzed by using a dichotomous outcome, measured according to risk ratio (RR) and marginal bone loss by continuously evaluating the outcomes according to the mean difference (MD), both with a corresponding 95% confidence interval (CI). Five studies, including 270 participants with a mean age of 54.70 years and receiving 434 dental implants, were included. The mean follow-up period was 4 years. Meta-analysis did not reveal a significant difference in relation to implant survival rate (P=.85; RR: −0.89; CI: −0.27 to 2.98), as well as to marginal bone loss (P=.85; MD: −0.43; CI: −0.43 to −0.52). Conclusions: One- and 2-piece implants demonstrated effectiveness in the rehabilitation of patients requiring dental implants.en
dc.description.affiliationPostgraduate student Department of Dental Materials and Prosthodontics Sao Paulo State University (UNESP)
dc.description.affiliationAssociate Professor Department of Dental Materials and Prosthodontics Sao Paulo State University (UNESP)
dc.description.affiliationFull Professor Department of Dental Materials and Prosthodontics Sao Paulo State University (UNESP)
dc.description.affiliationUnespPostgraduate student Department of Dental Materials and Prosthodontics Sao Paulo State University (UNESP)
dc.description.affiliationUnespAssociate Professor Department of Dental Materials and Prosthodontics Sao Paulo State University (UNESP)
dc.description.affiliationUnespFull Professor Department of Dental Materials and Prosthodontics Sao Paulo State University (UNESP)
dc.identifierhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2019.08.002
dc.identifier.citationJournal of Prosthetic Dentistry.
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.prosdent.2019.08.002
dc.identifier.issn0022-3913
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85076838477
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11449/201412
dc.language.isoeng
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of Prosthetic Dentistry
dc.sourceScopus
dc.titleA clinical comparison of 1-piece versus 2-piece implants: A systematic review and meta-analysisen
dc.typeResenhapt
dspace.entity.typePublication
relation.isDepartmentOfPublication5f53b343-da2a-4737-96ec-6e2389a6d704
relation.isDepartmentOfPublication.latestForDiscovery5f53b343-da2a-4737-96ec-6e2389a6d704
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublication8b3335a4-1163-438a-a0e2-921a46e0380d
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublication.latestForDiscovery8b3335a4-1163-438a-a0e2-921a46e0380d
unesp.campusUniversidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP), Faculdade de Odontologia, Araçatubapt
unesp.departmentMateriais odontológicos e Prótese - FOApt

Arquivos