Logotipo do repositório
 

Publicação:
Bond strength and Weibull analysis of fiber posts luted with different cement types and mechanically aged

dc.contributor.authorLira dos Santos, Elis Janaina
dc.contributor.authorCampos, Fernanda [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorDantas, Alana Moura Xavier
dc.contributor.authorLira, Maria Luiza Lima Alves
dc.contributor.authorWandsher, Vinícius Felipe
dc.contributor.authorSilva, Nathalia Ramos da
dc.contributor.authorValandro, Luiz Felipe
dc.contributor.authorSouza, Rodrigo Othávio de Assunção
dc.contributor.institutionUniversidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP)
dc.contributor.institutionUniversidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)
dc.contributor.institutionFederal University of Campina Grande (UFCG)
dc.contributor.institutionUniversidade Federal da Paraíba (UFPB)
dc.contributor.institutionUniversidade Federal de Sergipe (UFS)
dc.contributor.institutionFederal University of Rio Grande do Norte (UFRN)
dc.date.accessioned2021-06-25T10:32:44Z
dc.date.available2021-06-25T10:32:44Z
dc.date.issued2021-01-01
dc.description.abstractThis study aimed to evaluate the influence of cement type and mechanical cycling on the push-out bond strength (σ) of fiber posts luted to root canals. Eighty bovine single-root teeth were prepared and the roots were included with chemically cured acrylic resin. The specimens were allocated into 8 groups (n = 10) considering the factors ‘cement’ (glass ionomer cement–GIC, resin reinforced glass ionomer cement–RRGIC, conventional dual-cure resin cement–CRC, and self-adhesive resin cement–SARC) and ‘mechanical cycling’ (non-aged and aged–mc). The fiber posts and roots dentin were treated according to the cement type and luted to root canals. Composite-cores were made for the groups submitted to mechanical cycling (1,000,000 cycles, 84 N, 4 Hz). Each root were cut into 4 disk-samples of 1.8 mm (thickness) and submitted to push-out testing. Data (MPa) were analyzed using two-way ANOVA, Tukey test (5%), and Weibull analysis. ANOVA revealed that cement (p < 0.001) was significant; however, the mechanical cycling had no effect on bond strength (p = 0.895). The CRC (4.36 ± 1.15 MPa), CRCmc (4.13 ± 0.75 MPa), GIC (4.29 ± 2.14 MPa), and GICmc (4.04 ± 1.18 MPa) groups showed higher (σ) than RRGIC (2.36 ± 1.00 MPa). Weibull Characteristic strength of the CRC and CRCmc were significantly higher than RRGICmc, and RRGIC. The mixed type of failure was the most common. Conventional dual-cure resin cement and glass ionomer cement presented higher push-out bond strength to root dentin regardless of mechanical cycling.en
dc.description.affiliationDepartment of Prosthodontics and Periodontics Piracicaba Dental School University of Campinas (FOP/UNICAMP)
dc.description.affiliationInstitute of Science and Technology São Paulo State University (UNESP/FOSJC)
dc.description.affiliationMaterials Engineering Academic Unit Technology and Sciences Center Federal University of Campina Grande (UFCG)
dc.description.affiliationDepartment of Dental Restorative Dentistry Federal University of Paraíba (UFPB)
dc.description.affiliationDivision of Prosthodontics Department of Dental Restorative Dentistry Federal University of Santa Maria (UFSM)
dc.description.affiliationDivision of Prosthodontics Department of Dentistry Federal University of Rio Grande do Norte (UFRN)
dc.description.affiliationUnespInstitute of Science and Technology São Paulo State University (UNESP/FOSJC)
dc.identifierhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01694243.2021.1938473
dc.identifier.citationJournal of Adhesion Science and Technology.
dc.identifier.doi10.1080/01694243.2021.1938473
dc.identifier.issn1568-5616
dc.identifier.issn0169-4243
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85107850375
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11449/206479
dc.language.isoeng
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of Adhesion Science and Technology
dc.sourceScopus
dc.subjectbond strength
dc.subjectcementation
dc.subjectFiber post
dc.subjectmechanical cycling
dc.subjectroot dentine
dc.titleBond strength and Weibull analysis of fiber posts luted with different cement types and mechanically ageden
dc.typeArtigopt
dspace.entity.typePublication
unesp.author.orcid0000-0002-0324-3863[1]
unesp.author.orcid0000-0002-0100-2740[2]
unesp.author.orcid0000-0002-7573-811X[3]
unesp.author.orcid0000-0002-2542-3590[5]
unesp.author.orcid0000-0003-4153-3279[6]
unesp.author.orcid0000-0001-7203-6924[7]
unesp.author.orcid0000-0003-0856-7178[8]
unesp.campusUniversidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP), Instituto de Ciência e Tecnologia, São José dos Campospt

Arquivos