Logotipo do repositório
 

Publicação:
Geomorphometric environmental fragility of a watershed: a multicriteria spatial approach

dc.contributor.authorAmorim, Amanda Trindade [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authordo Nascimento Lopes, Elfany Reis
dc.contributor.authorde Sousa, Jocy Ana Paixão [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorde Cassia Ferreira da Silva, Rita [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorde Souza, José Carlos
dc.contributor.authorLourenço, Roberto Wagner [UNESP]
dc.contributor.institutionUniversidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
dc.contributor.institutionUniversitary Campus Sosigenes Costa
dc.contributor.institutionGoias State University
dc.date.accessioned2022-04-28T19:47:42Z
dc.date.available2022-04-28T19:47:42Z
dc.date.issued2021-12-01
dc.description.abstractKnowledge and understanding of the functioning of watersheds is essential for constructing future scenarios that aim to minimize instability. However, new approaches including variables, methods, and techniques into traditional methodologies contribute to environmental planning and management of such territorial units. This study aims to propose a model based on a multicriterion spatial approach for the analysis of the geomorphometric environmental fragility of watersheds. This study was conducted in the Murundú-Paiol watershed, located in the state of São Paulo, Brazil. Morphometric, geological, pedological, hypsometric, slope, land use, and land cover data were evaluated and integrated using geotechnologies for processing and analytical hierarchy process (AHP) considering a weighted linear combination for an integrated spatial analysis of the watershed. The study area shows a greater predisposition to fragility in areas of flat and smooth reliefs, especially around the main river, where there is a greater presence of anthropic areas. The methodology proposed here, which uses a multicriterion spatial approach and AHP, combined with technical and scientific data, allows replicating the model to another watersheds. Modeling was validated in a cooperative way using an in-field, traditional method. The watershed evaluated showed that 49.13% and 26.83% of lands have medium and low fragility, respectively, while about 17% of lands have a high fragility and their management should be a priority. Modeling correlates strongly and positively with fragility class detailing, and field areas corroborate the model proposed here. This evidenced a robust analysis of factors that affect the geomorphometric environmental fragility of watersheds. The method is efficient in contributing to environmental planning and management of this territorial unit.en
dc.description.affiliationFaculty of Science and Technology São Paulo State University (Unesp)
dc.description.affiliationFederal University Southern of Bahia Universitary Campus Sosigenes Costa
dc.description.affiliationInstitute of Science and Technology São Paulo State University (Unesp)
dc.description.affiliationGoias State University, Campus Cora Coralina
dc.description.affiliationUnespFaculty of Science and Technology São Paulo State University (Unesp)
dc.description.affiliationUnespInstitute of Science and Technology São Paulo State University (Unesp)
dc.description.sponsorshipCoordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior (CAPES)
dc.description.sponsorshipIdCAPES: 001
dc.identifierhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10661-021-09634-6
dc.identifier.citationEnvironmental Monitoring and Assessment, v. 193, n. 12, 2021.
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/s10661-021-09634-6
dc.identifier.issn1573-2959
dc.identifier.issn0167-6369
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85120076413
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11449/222941
dc.language.isoeng
dc.relation.ispartofEnvironmental Monitoring and Assessment
dc.sourceScopus
dc.subjectEnvironmental degradation
dc.subjectGeomorphometric fragility
dc.subjectGeotechnologies
dc.subjectIntegrated analysis
dc.subjectWater resource
dc.titleGeomorphometric environmental fragility of a watershed: a multicriteria spatial approachen
dc.typeArtigopt
dspace.entity.typePublication
unesp.author.orcid0000-0002-7359-6859[1]
unesp.author.orcid0000-0003-1269-3986[2]
unesp.author.orcid0000-0003-0937-786X[3]
unesp.author.orcid0000-0002-5858-3072[4]
unesp.author.orcid0000-0001-9760-6559[5]
unesp.author.orcid0000-0002-5234-8944[6]
unesp.campusUniversidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP), Faculdade de Ciências e Tecnologia, Presidente Prudentept

Arquivos