Atenção!


O atendimento às questões referentes ao Repositório Institucional será interrompido entre os dias 20 de dezembro de 2025 a 4 de janeiro de 2026.

Pedimos a sua compreensão e aproveitamos para desejar boas festas!

Logo do repositório

Basal or stimulated thyroglobulin in evaluating response to treatment in papillary thyroid carcinoma? A retrospective cohort study

dc.contributor.authorBarreto, Leticia [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorFerreira, Deborah Cristina Goulart [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorCorrente, José Eduardo [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorSoares, Carlos Segundo Paiva [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorOliveira, Cristiano Claudino
dc.contributor.authorTerra, Simone Antunes [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorMoriguchi, Sonia Marta [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorKoga, Katia Hiromoto [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorTagliarini, José Vicente [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorda Silva Mazeto, Gláucia Maria Ferreira [UNESP]
dc.contributor.institutionUniversidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
dc.contributor.institutionAC Camargo Cancer Center
dc.date.accessioned2025-04-29T19:13:20Z
dc.date.issued2024-03-01
dc.description.abstractObjective: It is not clear whether response to initial treatment in papillary thyroid carcinoma (PTC) patients is best evaluated by measuring thyroglobulin (Tg) in the presence of levothyroxine (BTg) or when stimulated by elevated TSH (STg). The aim of this study was to evaluate whether response to therapy 1 year after initial treatment changes with the use of STg in relation to BTg in PTC patients treated with total thyroidectomy (TT) and radioiodine (131I), and, if observed, to assess which response is better associated with clinical course. Subjects and methods: This is a retrospective study of 148 PTC patients submitted to TT and 131I. We analyzed the response to therapy (excellent, biochemical incomplete, or indeterminate) at 1 year after initial treatment, using BTg or STg, and compared which method was better associated with “excellent response at final evaluation.” Results: Twenty-eight patients (20.4%) presented change in response to therapy, with 17 of these (60.7%) presenting a worse response. Response using STg was 1.6 times better associated with proposed outcome [odds ratio (OR) = 4.61; confidence interval 95% (IC95%): 2.13–9.98] than with BTg (OR = 2.84; IC95%: 1.33–6.06). Conclusion: Response to therapy at 1 year using STg was altered in approximately 20% of cases and therefore proved to be a better predictor of excellent response in the last evaluation.en
dc.description.affiliationInternal Medicine Department Botucatu Medical School Sao Paulo State University – Unesp
dc.description.affiliationBiosciences Institute Bioestatistics Department – Unesp
dc.description.affiliationOphthalmology Otorhinolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery Department Botucatu Medical School Sao Paulo State University – Unesp
dc.description.affiliationDepartment of Pathological Anatomy AC Camargo Cancer Center
dc.description.affiliationPathology Department Botucatu Medical School Sao Paulo State University – Unesp
dc.description.affiliationNuclear Medicine Department Botucatu Medical School Sao Paulo State University – Unesp
dc.description.affiliationUnespInternal Medicine Department Botucatu Medical School Sao Paulo State University – Unesp
dc.description.affiliationUnespBiosciences Institute Bioestatistics Department – Unesp
dc.description.affiliationUnespOphthalmology Otorhinolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery Department Botucatu Medical School Sao Paulo State University – Unesp
dc.description.affiliationUnespPathology Department Botucatu Medical School Sao Paulo State University – Unesp
dc.description.affiliationUnespNuclear Medicine Department Botucatu Medical School Sao Paulo State University – Unesp
dc.description.sponsorshipFundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo (FAPESP)
dc.description.sponsorshipIdFAPESP: 2021/05011-7
dc.format.extent97-106
dc.identifierhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s42000-023-00503-0
dc.identifier.citationHormones, v. 23, n. 1, p. 97-106, 2024.
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/s42000-023-00503-0
dc.identifier.issn2520-8721
dc.identifier.issn1109-3099
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85177737254
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11449/302018
dc.language.isoeng
dc.relation.ispartofHormones
dc.sourceScopus
dc.subjectBiomarkers, Tumor
dc.subjectClinical evolution
dc.subjectPrognosis
dc.subjectThyroglobulin
dc.subjectThyroid cancer, Papillary
dc.titleBasal or stimulated thyroglobulin in evaluating response to treatment in papillary thyroid carcinoma? A retrospective cohort studyen
dc.typeArtigopt
dspace.entity.typePublication
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublicationa3cdb24b-db92-40d9-b3af-2eacecf9f2ba
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublication.latestForDiscoverya3cdb24b-db92-40d9-b3af-2eacecf9f2ba
unesp.author.orcid0000-0002-5340-1276[1]
unesp.author.orcid0000-0001-5860-3187[2]
unesp.author.orcid0000-0001-5478-4996[3]
unesp.author.orcid0000-0003-0121-9533[4]
unesp.author.orcid0000-0001-6682-5230[5]
unesp.author.orcid0000-0001-7929-9014[6]
unesp.author.orcid0000-0001-5834-2714[7]
unesp.author.orcid0000-0001-6223-7263[8]
unesp.author.orcid0000-0002-0869-724X[9]
unesp.author.orcid0000-0003-2129-7256[10]
unesp.campusUniversidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP), Faculdade de Medicina, Botucatupt

Arquivos