Logotipo do repositório
 

Publicação:
Fertilizer source and application method influence sugarcane production and nutritional status

dc.contributor.authorCastro, Sérgio Gustavo Quassi de
dc.contributor.authorCoelho, Anderson Prates [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorCastro, Saulo Augusto Quassi de
dc.contributor.authorSouza Chiachia, Thais Regina de
dc.contributor.authorCastro, Rosilaine Araldi de
dc.contributor.authorLemos, Leandro Borges [UNESP]
dc.contributor.institutionAgroQuatro-S Experimentation and Applied Agronomic Consultancy
dc.contributor.institutionUniversidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
dc.contributor.institutionUniversidade de São Paulo (USP)
dc.contributor.institutionYara Brazil Fertilizers S/A
dc.date.accessioned2023-07-29T16:09:11Z
dc.date.available2023-07-29T16:09:11Z
dc.date.issued2023-01-01
dc.description.abstractIntroduction: The contrasting weather conditions throughout the sugarcane harvest period in south-central Brazil (April to November) influence fertilization management in sugarcane ratoon. Methods: Through field studies carried out over two cropping seasons, we aimed to compare the performance of sugarcane at sites harvested in the early and late periods of the harvest season as a function of fertilizer sources associated with application methods. The design used in each site was a randomized block in a 2 x 3 factorial scheme; the first factor consisted of fertilizer sources (solid and liquid), and the second factor consisted of application methods (above the straw, under the straw, and incorporated into the middle of the sugarcane row). Results: The fertilizer source and application method interacted at the site harvested in the early period of the sugarcane harvest season. Overall, the highest sugarcane stalk and sugar yields at this site were obtained with the incorporated application applying liquid fertilizer and under straw applying solid fertilizer, with increments of up to 33%. For the site harvested in the late period of the sugarcane harvest season, the liquid fertilizer promoted a 25% higher sugarcane stalk yield compared to the solid fertilizer in the crop season with low rainfall in the spring, while in the crop season with normal rainfall, there were no differences between treatments. Discussion: This demonstrates the importance of defining fertilization management in sugarcane as a function of harvest time, thereby promoting greater sustainability in the production system.en
dc.description.affiliationAgroQuatro-S Experimentation and Applied Agronomic Consultancy, São Paulo
dc.description.affiliationSchool of Agricultural and Veterinarian Sciences São Paulo State University (Unesp), São Paulo
dc.description.affiliationDepartment of Soil Science “Luiz de Queiroz” College of Agriculture University of São Paulo, São Paulo
dc.description.affiliationYara Brazil Fertilizers S/A, Rio Grande do Sul
dc.description.affiliationUnespSchool of Agricultural and Veterinarian Sciences São Paulo State University (Unesp), São Paulo
dc.identifierhttp://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2023.1099589
dc.identifier.citationFrontiers in Plant Science, v. 14.
dc.identifier.doi10.3389/fpls.2023.1099589
dc.identifier.issn1664-462X
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85150731575
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11449/249788
dc.language.isoeng
dc.relation.ispartofFrontiers in Plant Science
dc.sourceScopus
dc.subjectliquid fertilizer
dc.subjectnitrogen
dc.subjectphosphorus
dc.subjectpotassium
dc.subjectstraw
dc.titleFertilizer source and application method influence sugarcane production and nutritional statusen
dc.typeArtigo
dspace.entity.typePublication
unesp.departmentProdução Vegetal - FCAVpt

Arquivos