Logo do repositório
 

On-farm pig dispatch methods and stockpeople attitudes on their use

dc.contributor.authorDalla Costa, Filipe Antonio [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorGibson, Troy John
dc.contributor.authorOliveira, Steffan Edward Octávio
dc.contributor.authorGregory, Neville George
dc.contributor.authorColdebella, Arlei
dc.contributor.authorFaucitano, Luigi
dc.contributor.authorDalla Costa, Osmar Antonio
dc.contributor.institutionUniversidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)
dc.contributor.institutionUniversity of London
dc.contributor.institutionUniversidade de São Paulo (USP)
dc.contributor.institutionEmpresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária (EMBRAPA)
dc.contributor.institutionAgriculture and Agri-Food Canada
dc.date.accessioned2019-10-06T16:12:48Z
dc.date.available2019-10-06T16:12:48Z
dc.date.issued2019-03-01
dc.description.abstractThis study surveyed the on-farm dispatching methods used at pig farms, the characteristics of stockpeople operating them, in terms of training and management, and their opinions and attitudes about the efficiency and safety of the applied procedures. Independently of the pig type, the most used dispatching methods at the surveyed Brazilian farms were concussion (90%) and electrocution (5%). Both methods were reported as being efficient and safe for on-farm pig dispatching by most stockpeople (83%). However, 33% of all stockpeople reported they would prefer to use alternative methods, i.e., anesthetics (23%) or electrocution (32%). Only 7% of the stockpeople received training resulting in a more efficient application of the method (P < 0.05). Most stockpeople (96%) declared to feel uncomfortable with the dispatching procedure they use. This discomfort lasted for half a day or longer in 22% of them. The results of this survey suggest that the application of dispatching methods at pig farms may result in animal welfare issues related to the effectiveness of the methods and the attitudes of stockpeople.en
dc.description.affiliationPrograma de Pós-graduação em Zootecnia Faculdade de Ciências Agrárias e Veterinárias UNESP—São Paulo State University
dc.description.affiliationRoyal Veterinary College University of London
dc.description.affiliationFaculdade de Medicina Veterinária e Zootecnia Universidade de São Paulo
dc.description.affiliationEmbrapa Swine and Poultry, BR 153, Km 110
dc.description.affiliationAgriculture and Agri-Food Canada, 2000 College Street
dc.description.affiliationUnespPrograma de Pós-graduação em Zootecnia Faculdade de Ciências Agrárias e Veterinárias UNESP—São Paulo State University
dc.format.extent1-5
dc.identifierhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.livsci.2019.01.007
dc.identifier.citationLivestock Science, v. 221, p. 1-5.
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.livsci.2019.01.007
dc.identifier.issn1871-1413
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85059664440
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11449/188585
dc.language.isoeng
dc.relation.ispartofLivestock Science
dc.rights.accessRightsAcesso aberto
dc.sourceScopus
dc.subjectAnimal welfare
dc.subjectCaretaker
dc.subjectCulling
dc.subjectKilling
dc.subjectStockpeople attitudes
dc.subjectSurvey
dc.titleOn-farm pig dispatch methods and stockpeople attitudes on their useen
dc.typeArtigo
dspace.entity.typePublication
unesp.author.orcid0000-0002-6038-841X[1]
unesp.departmentZootecnia - FCAVpt

Arquivos