Logo do repositório

Yield and Agronomic Efficiency of Maize under Conventional and Enhanced-efficiency Nitrogen Sources

dc.contributor.authorde Souza, Juscélio Ramos [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorMeirelles, Flávia Constantino [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorRibeiro, Bruno Neves [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorde Gissi, Luciano
dc.contributor.authorCoelho, Anderson Prates [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorLemos, Leandro Borges [UNESP]
dc.contributor.institutionUniversidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
dc.contributor.institutionEssere Group
dc.date.accessioned2025-04-29T18:50:22Z
dc.date.issued2025-03-01
dc.description.abstractSeveral factors interfere with the agronomic efficiency of nitrogen fertilizers, which may be related to the soil, crop, management and source used. The aim was to evaluate and compare the efficiency of nitrogen sources and rates in top-dressing on maize agronomic traits in two seasons. The experiment was conducted in southeastern Brazil in a randomized block design, with four replicates. Treatments were distributed in a 3 × 3 + 1 factorial scheme, using three sources of N (conventional urea, ammonium nitrate and compacted urea with additives and polymers) and four N rates (0, 70, 140 and 210 kg ha− 1), applied in top-dressing 18 days after maize emergence in both seasons (phenological stage V4). Compared to conventional urea, compacted urea promoted maize yields up to 30% and 19% higher in the first and second seasons, respectively. Based on regression analysis, maximum grain yields of 12,297, 12,089 and 9,485 kg ha− 1 were obtained in the first season when compacted urea, ammonium nitrate and conventional urea were used at rates of 162, 168 and 195 kg ha− 1 of N, respectively. Compacted urea reduces nitrogen requirements by up to 17% compared to conventional urea for maximum maize yield. There was greater agronomic efficiency for compacted urea and ammonium nitrate. The highest agronomic efficiencies occurred at the rate of 70 kg ha− 1, regardless of the N source and the seasons. These results demonstrate the benefits of compacted urea with additives and polymers in increasing maize yield, in addition to allowing N rate reduction for maximum yield.en
dc.description.affiliationSchool of Agricultural and Veterinary Sciences São Paulo State University (Unesp), Via de Acesso Prof. Paulo Donatto Castellane, km 5, s/n
dc.description.affiliationEssere Group Departamento de Fertilizantes (Centro da Kimberlit Agrociências), SP
dc.description.affiliationUnespSchool of Agricultural and Veterinary Sciences São Paulo State University (Unesp), Via de Acesso Prof. Paulo Donatto Castellane, km 5, s/n
dc.format.extent131-140
dc.identifierhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s42106-024-00324-0
dc.identifier.citationInternational Journal of Plant Production, v. 19, n. 1, p. 131-140, 2025.
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/s42106-024-00324-0
dc.identifier.issn1735-8043
dc.identifier.issn1735-6814
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85217199557
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11449/300701
dc.language.isoeng
dc.relation.ispartofInternational Journal of Plant Production
dc.sourceScopus
dc.subjectCoated fertilizer
dc.subjectFirst season
dc.subjectNitrogen fertilizer
dc.subjectSecond season
dc.subjectZea maysL
dc.titleYield and Agronomic Efficiency of Maize under Conventional and Enhanced-efficiency Nitrogen Sourcesen
dc.typeArtigopt
dspace.entity.typePublication
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublication3d807254-e442-45e5-a80b-0f6bf3a26e48
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublication.latestForDiscovery3d807254-e442-45e5-a80b-0f6bf3a26e48
unesp.author.orcid0000-0003-2472-9704[5]
unesp.campusUniversidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP), Faculdade de Ciências Agrárias e Veterinárias, Jaboticabalpt

Arquivos