Logotipo do repositório
 

Publicação:
Replacement of common urea with protected urea in sheep supplement

dc.contributor.authorRibeiro, Paola Rezende [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorSchultz, Erica Beatriz
dc.contributor.authorSousa, Luciano Fernandes
dc.contributor.authorMacedo Junior, Gilberto de Lima
dc.contributor.institutionUniversidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
dc.contributor.institutionUniversidade Federal de Viçosa (UFV)
dc.contributor.institutionUniv Fed Tocantins
dc.contributor.institutionUniversidade Federal de Uberlândia (UFU)
dc.date.accessioned2022-11-30T13:39:47Z
dc.date.available2022-11-30T13:39:47Z
dc.date.issued2021-01-01
dc.description.abstractThe objective was to evaluate the effect of replacing common urea with protected urea in the supplement on the nutrient intake and digestibility and metabolic profile of sheep. Five adult sheep, with an average age of 4 years and an initial average body weight of 50 +/- 4.03 kg, were used. The diet consisted of sorghum silage, supplemented with a multiple mixture of corn bran, soybean meal, white salt, mineral salt, common urea ( CU) or protected urea (PU). The experimental design was a 5x5 Latin square. Treatments consisted of: control or 100% CU, 75% CU and 25% PU, 50% CU and 50% PU, 25% CU and 75% PU and 100% PU. Collections and analysis of feed, feces, urine and blood were carried out to assess intake, digestibility and blood metabolites. Analysis of variance and SNK test were applied considering 5% significance. Nonparametric data were analyzed by Kruskal-Wallis at a significance level of 5%. The replacement of common urea with protected urea did not (P>0.05) alter the intake of dry matter, crude protein and water, and the dry matter digestibility. The production of urine and feces, and the density of urine also did not (P>0.05) show statistical difference with the replacement of common urea with protected urea. As for protein and energy metabolites, only glycemia showed variation (P<0.05), with the proportion of 75% CU and 25% PU, indicating the highest concentration of glucose in relation to the replacement of 0, 50 and 100% PU in the supplement. There are no benefits from partial or total replacement of common urea with protected urea in sheep supplementation.en
dc.description.affiliationUniv Estadual Paulista Julio de Mesquita Filho UN, Jaboticabal, SP, Brazil
dc.description.affiliationUniv Fed Vicosa, Vicosa, MG, Brazil
dc.description.affiliationUniv Fed Tocantins, Tocantins, TO, Brazil
dc.description.affiliationUniv Fed Uberlandia, Uberlandia, MG, Brazil
dc.description.affiliationUnespUniv Estadual Paulista Julio de Mesquita Filho UN, Jaboticabal, SP, Brazil
dc.format.extent11
dc.identifierhttp://dx.doi.org/10.17523/bia.2021.v78.e1501
dc.identifier.citationBoletim De Industria Animal. Nova Odessa: Inst Zootecnia, v. 78, 11 p., 2021.
dc.identifier.doi10.17523/bia.2021.v78.e1501
dc.identifier.issn0067-9615
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11449/237604
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000818967200004
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherInst Zootecnia
dc.relation.ispartofBoletim De Industria Animal
dc.sourceWeb of Science
dc.subjectMultiple mixture
dc.subjectNon-protein nitrogen
dc.subjectNutrition
dc.subjectSheep
dc.subjectSilage
dc.titleReplacement of common urea with protected urea in sheep supplementen
dc.typeArtigopt
dcterms.rightsHolderInst Zootecnia
dspace.entity.typePublication
unesp.campusUniversidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP), Faculdade de Ciências Agrárias e Veterinárias, Jaboticabalpt

Arquivos