Logo do repositório

Phase angle differences between injured and uninjured athletes: A cross-sectional study

dc.contributor.authorSganzerla, Gianfranco
dc.contributor.authorGobbo, Luis Alberto [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorMendonça, André Luiz Bisel
dc.contributor.authorRavagnani, Fabricio Cesar de Paula
dc.contributor.authorOliveira-Junior, Silvio Assis de
dc.contributor.authorCordeiro, Vitor
dc.contributor.authorCoelho-Ravagnani, Christianne F.
dc.contributor.institutionFederal University of Mato Grosso do Sul
dc.contributor.institutionUniversidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
dc.contributor.institutionFederal Institute of Science and Technology of Mato Grosso do Sul
dc.date.accessioned2025-04-29T20:08:11Z
dc.date.issued2025-06-01
dc.description.abstractObjective: To compare the phase angle (PhA) values of injured and uninjured hemibodies in athletes (n = 138; 19.4 ± 5.3 y; 75.4 % men). Methods: A 50 kHz, octopolar bioelectrical impedance analyzer (BIA) was used to obtain PhA values and an orthopedic physical examination (OPE) was performed to assess injuries. The injuries were grouped according to body region, so that injuries in the right or left limbs (arm and/or leg) were grouped into “right injured hemibody” or “left injured hemibody’’. The uninjured contralateral hemibody was used as a control. The paired Student's t-test and Wilcoxon test were performed to assess the differences in PhA between right and left hemibodies. Results: Comparing uninjured hemibodies, the right side exhibited higher PhA (14.1 ± 2.0 vs. 13.8 ± 2.1, p < 0.001) compared to the left side. The uninjured right hemibody also exhibited higher PhA than the injured left hemibody (14.6 ± 1.9 vs. 14.3 ± 1.7, p = 0.032). Athletes with the right side affected by injuries presented similar PhA compared to their respective uninjured left hemibodies (14.1 ± 1.6 vs. 14.0 ± 1.5, p = 0.186). Conclusion: PhA is different between hemibodies, being higher in the right side, possibly because of the athletes’ laterality. However, the differences in PhA between hemibodies disappeared when the right side was injured, showing that the PhA was affected by injuries.en
dc.description.affiliationGraduate Program in Health and Development in the Midwest Region of Brazil Federal University of Mato Grosso do Sul, MS
dc.description.affiliationDepartment of Physical Education São Paulo State University, SP
dc.description.affiliationFederal Institute of Science and Technology of Mato Grosso do Sul, MS
dc.description.affiliationResearch Group in Exercise and Nutrition in Health and Sports Performance - PENSARE Federal University of Mato Grosso do Sul, MS
dc.description.affiliationGraduate Program in Movement Sciences Federal University of Mato Grosso do Sul, MS
dc.description.affiliationUnespDepartment of Physical Education São Paulo State University, SP
dc.format.extent583-588
dc.identifierhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jbmt.2025.01.030
dc.identifier.citationJournal of Bodywork and Movement Therapies, v. 42, p. 583-588.
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.jbmt.2025.01.030
dc.identifier.issn1532-9283
dc.identifier.issn1360-8592
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85216475565
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11449/307023
dc.language.isoeng
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of Bodywork and Movement Therapies
dc.sourceScopus
dc.subjectElectric impedance
dc.subjectPhysical examination
dc.subjectSports
dc.titlePhase angle differences between injured and uninjured athletes: A cross-sectional studyen
dc.typeArtigopt
dspace.entity.typePublication
unesp.author.orcid0000-0003-0324-3107[1]
unesp.author.orcid0000-0002-8895-9456 0000-0002-8895-9456[5]

Arquivos

Coleções