Logotipo do repositório
 

Publicação:
Leaf reference values for ‘Pérola’ pineapple quality using compositional nutrient diagnosis

dc.contributor.authorBelarmino Rodrigues, João Batista
dc.contributor.authorda Silva, Alexandre Paiva
dc.contributor.authorRozane, Danilo Eduardo [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorNatale, William
dc.contributor.authorde Melo Silva, Silvanda
dc.contributor.institutionUniversidade Federal da Paraíba (UFPB)
dc.contributor.institutionUniversidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
dc.contributor.institutionFederal University of Ceará (UFC)
dc.date.accessioned2022-04-28T19:48:52Z
dc.date.available2022-04-28T19:48:52Z
dc.date.issued2021-01-01
dc.description.abstractThe leaf reference values for pineapple available in the literature were obtained using bivariate methods that aim to reach maximum yield; however, plant nutrition also influences the fruit quality. This study aimed to generate reference values for the ‘Pérola’ pineapple grown in the Paraíba State using compositional nutrient diagnosis (CND) in order to maximize fruit yield and quality. The study used data of fruit weight, soluble solids (SS), titratable acidity (TA), SS/TA ratio, and leaf concentrations of N, P, K, S, Ca, Mg, Cu, Fe, Zn, Mn, and B of the pineapple cultivar ‘Pérola’ originated from fertilization trials. The treatments consisted of the combination of two matrices: the modified Pan Puebla III matrix and the Baconian matrix, which assessed the variation in the levels of N, P, K, and S and the variation in the levels of liming and micronutrients, respectively, totaling 30 treatments in a randomized block design with 90 plots and three replications per experiment. The CND method was used to obtain reference values. There were differences in the mean nutrient concentrations between the high and low-quality populations; however, there was no difference between the nutrient concentrations that promoted the highest fruit weight and those that promoted the highest quality index. The sufficiency ranges for ‘Pérola’ pineapple obtained by CND methodology aiming at the quality index and yield were: N:10.9–14.2; P:1.2–1.6; K: 35.6–42.8; S: 1.0–1.5; Ca: 2.3–3.7; Mg: 1.5–2.2 g kg−1; Cu: 1.1–3.1; Fe: 30.4–52.6; Zn: 4.0–8.5; Mn: 129.2–175.9; and B: 18.8–27.4 mg kg−1.en
dc.description.affiliationDepartment of Soils and Rural Engineering Federal University of Paraíba (UFPB)
dc.description.affiliationDepartment of Agronomic Engineering State University of São Paulo (UNESP)
dc.description.affiliationDepartment of Phytotechnics Federal University of Ceará (UFC)
dc.description.affiliationDepartment of Fundamental and Social Sciences Federal University of Paraíba (UFPB)
dc.description.affiliationUnespDepartment of Agronomic Engineering State University of São Paulo (UNESP)
dc.identifierhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01904167.2021.2020826
dc.identifier.citationJournal of Plant Nutrition.
dc.identifier.doi10.1080/01904167.2021.2020826
dc.identifier.issn1532-4087
dc.identifier.issn0190-4167
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85122076528
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11449/223137
dc.language.isoeng
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of Plant Nutrition
dc.sourceScopus
dc.subjectAnanas comosus comosus
dc.subjectCND norms
dc.subjectcritical levels
dc.subjectsufficiency ranges
dc.titleLeaf reference values for ‘Pérola’ pineapple quality using compositional nutrient diagnosisen
dc.typeArtigo
dspace.entity.typePublication
unesp.author.orcid0000-0002-6251-4176[1]
unesp.author.orcid0000-0002-8128-1726[2]
unesp.author.orcid0000-0003-0518-3689[3]
unesp.author.orcid0000-0001-9572-4463[4]
unesp.author.orcid0000-0003-2106-6458[5]

Arquivos

Coleções