Logo do repositório

Underestimated Cervical Cancer among Women over 65 Years Old: Is It Time to Revise the Screening Target Age Group?

dc.contributor.authorZago, Renata Alfena
dc.contributor.authorCamilo-Júnior, Deolino João
dc.contributor.authorD'Ávilla, Solange Correa Garcia Pires
dc.contributor.authorXavier-Júnior, José Cândido Caldeira [UNESP]
dc.contributor.institutionCentro Universitário Católico Unisalesiano Auxilium
dc.contributor.institutionInstituto de Patologia de Araçatuba
dc.contributor.institutionFaculdade de Medicina de São José Do Rio Preto
dc.contributor.institutionUniversidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
dc.date.accessioned2025-04-29T18:40:46Z
dc.date.issued2023-04-17
dc.description.abstractObjective ?To compare cytological and histological results from women > 64 years old who followed the Brazilian national cervical cancer screening guidelines with those who did not. Methods ?The present observational retrospective study analyzed 207 abnormal cervical smear results from women > 64 years old in a mid-sized city in Brazil over 14 years. All results were reported according to the Bethesda System. The women were divided into those who followed the screening guidelines and those who did not. Results ?Atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance and low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion cytology results were found in 128 (62.2%) cases. Of these, 112 (87.5%) had repeated cytology with positive results. The other 79 (38.1%) with abnormal results should have been referred to colposcopy and biopsy. Out of 41 (51.9%) biopsied women, 23 (29.1%) had a confirmed diagnosis of neoplasia or precursor lesion. In contrast, among the 78 (37.7%) biopsied patients, 40 (51.3%) followed the guideline recommendations, with 9 (22.5%) positive biopsies. Of the 38 (48.7%) women who did not follow the guidelines, there were 24 (63.1%) positive results. Women who did not follow the guidelines demonstrated higher chances of cancer and precursor lesions (odds ratio [OR]: 5.904; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 2.188-15.932; p = 0.0002). Conclusion ?Women > 64 years old who did not follow the national screening protocol showed significant differences in the frequency of abnormal results and severity of diagnosis compared with those who followed the protocol.en
dc.description.affiliationSchool of Medicine Centro Universitário Católico Unisalesiano Auxilium, SP
dc.description.affiliationInstituto de Patologia de Araçatuba, SP
dc.description.affiliationFaculdade de Medicina de São José Do Rio Preto, SP
dc.description.affiliationFaculdade de Medicina de Botucatu Universidade Estadual Paulista, SP
dc.description.affiliationUnespFaculdade de Medicina de Botucatu Universidade Estadual Paulista, SP
dc.format.extentE790-E795
dc.identifierhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0043-1772477
dc.identifier.citationRevista Brasileira de Ginecologia e Obstetricia, v. 45, n. 12, p. E790-E795, 2023.
dc.identifier.doi10.1055/s-0043-1772477
dc.identifier.issn0100-7203
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85181179298
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11449/298890
dc.language.isoeng
dc.relation.ispartofRevista Brasileira de Ginecologia e Obstetricia
dc.sourceScopus
dc.subjectaging health
dc.subjectcytology
dc.subjectpapanicolaou test
dc.subjectscreening
dc.subjectuterine cervical neoplasms
dc.titleUnderestimated Cervical Cancer among Women over 65 Years Old: Is It Time to Revise the Screening Target Age Group?en
dc.titleCancer cervical subestimado entre mulheres com mais de 65 anos:E hora de rever a faixa etaria alvo do rastreamento?pt
dc.typeArtigopt
dspace.entity.typePublication
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublicationa3cdb24b-db92-40d9-b3af-2eacecf9f2ba
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublication.latestForDiscoverya3cdb24b-db92-40d9-b3af-2eacecf9f2ba
unesp.author.orcid0000-0003-1519-1543[1]
unesp.author.orcid0000-0002-2980-1368[2]
unesp.author.orcid0000-0003-0503-419X 0000-0003-0503-419X 0000-0003-0503-419X[4]
unesp.campusUniversidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP), Faculdade de Medicina, Botucatupt

Arquivos