Logo do repositório

Assessment of landmark detection in cephalometric radiographs with different conditions of brightness and contrast using the an artificial intelligence software

dc.contributor.authorSantos Menezes, Liciane dos
dc.contributor.authorSilva, Thaísa Pinheiro
dc.contributor.authorLima dos Santos, Marcos Antônio
dc.contributor.authorHughes, Mariana Mendonça
dc.contributor.authorReis Mariano Souza, Saulo dos
dc.contributor.authorLeite Ribeiro, Patrícia Miranda
dc.contributor.authorLuiz de Freitas, Paulo Henrique
dc.contributor.authorTakeshita, Wilton Mitsunari [UNESP]
dc.contributor.institutionUniversidade Federal da Bahia (UFBA)
dc.contributor.institutionUniversidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP)
dc.contributor.institutionUniversidade de São Paulo (USP)
dc.contributor.institutionUniversidade Federal de Sergipe (UFS)
dc.contributor.institutionUniversidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
dc.date.accessioned2025-04-29T18:42:17Z
dc.date.issued2023-01-01
dc.description.abstractObjectives To evaluate the reliability and reproducibility of an artificial intelligence (AI) software in identifying cephalometric points on lateral cephalometric radiographs considering four settings of brightness and contrast. Methods and materials Brightness and contrast of 30 lateral cephalometric radiographs were adjusted into four different settings. Then, the control examiner (ECont), the calibrated examiner (ECal), and the CEFBOT AI software (AIs) each marked 19 cephalometric points on all radiographs. Reliability was assessed with a second analysis of the radiographs 15 days after the first one. Statistical significance was set at p < 0.05. Results: Reliability of landmark identification was excellent for the human examiners and the AIs regardless of the type of brightness and contrast setting (mean intraclass correlation coefficient >0.89). When ECont and ECal were compared for reproducibility, there were more cephalometric points with significant differences on the x-axis of the image with the highest contrast and the lowest brightness, namely N(p = 0.033), S(p = 0.030), Po(p < 0.001), and Pog’(p = 0.012). Between ECont and AIs, there were more cephalometric points with significant differences on the image with the highest contrast and the lowest brightness, namely N(p = 0.034), Or(p = 0.048), Po(p < 0.001), A(p = 0.042), Pog’(p = 0.004), Ll(p = 0.005), Ul(p < 0.001), and Sn(p = 0.001). Conclusions While the reliability of the AIs for cephalometric landmark identification was rated as excellent, low brightness and high contrast seemed to affect its reproducibility. The experienced human examiner, on the other hand, did not show such faulty reproducibility; therefore, the AIs used in this study is an excellent auxiliary tool for cephalometric analysis, but still depends on human supervision to be clinically reliable. Dentomaxillofacial Radiology (2023) 52, 20230065. doi: 10.1259/dmfr.20230065 Cite this article as: Menezes LS, Silva TP, Lima dos Santos MA, Hughes MM, Mariano Souza SR, Leite Ribeiro PM, et al. Assessment of landmark detection in cephalometric radiographs with different conditions of brightness and contrast using the an artificial intelligence software.en
dc.description.affiliationDepartment of Oral Diagnosis Federal University of Bahia
dc.description.affiliationDepartment of Oral Diagnosis Piracicaba Dental School University of Campinas
dc.description.affiliationDepartment of Oral Diagnosis University of São Paulo
dc.description.affiliationDepartment of Dentistry Federal University of Sergipe
dc.description.affiliationDiagnosis and Surgery São Paulo State University (Unesp) School of Dentistry, Araçatuba
dc.description.affiliationUnespDiagnosis and Surgery São Paulo State University (Unesp) School of Dentistry, Araçatuba
dc.identifierhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1259/dmfr.20230065
dc.identifier.citationDentomaxillofacial Radiology, v. 52, n. 8, 2023.
dc.identifier.doi10.1259/dmfr.20230065
dc.identifier.issn1476-542X
dc.identifier.issn0250-832X
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85178459344
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11449/299400
dc.language.isoeng
dc.relation.ispartofDentomaxillofacial Radiology
dc.sourceScopus
dc.subjectArtificial intelligence
dc.subjectCephalometry
dc.subjectDental radiography
dc.subjectMachine learning
dc.subjectRadiology
dc.subjectReproducibility of results
dc.titleAssessment of landmark detection in cephalometric radiographs with different conditions of brightness and contrast using the an artificial intelligence softwareen
dc.typeArtigopt
dspace.entity.typePublication
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublication8b3335a4-1163-438a-a0e2-921a46e0380d
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublication.latestForDiscovery8b3335a4-1163-438a-a0e2-921a46e0380d
unesp.campusUniversidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP), Faculdade de Odontologia, Araçatubapt

Arquivos