Logotipo do repositório
 

Publicação:
Characteristics of radiographic images acquired with CdTe, CCD and CMOS detectors in skull radiography

dc.contributor.authorQueiroz, Polyane Mazucatto
dc.contributor.authorSantaella, Gustavo Machado
dc.contributor.authorPereira de Castro Lopes, Sergio Lucio [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorHaiter-Neto, Francisco
dc.contributor.authorFreitas, Deborah Queiroz
dc.contributor.institutionUniversidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP)
dc.contributor.institutionUniversidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)
dc.date.accessioned2021-06-25T12:30:45Z
dc.date.available2021-06-25T12:30:45Z
dc.date.issued2020-12-01
dc.description.abstractPurpose: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the image quality, diagnostic efficacy, and radiation dose associated with the use of a cadmium telluride (CdTe) detector, compared to charge-coupled device (CCD) and complementary metal oxide semiconductor (CMOS) detectors. Materials and Methods: Lateral cephalographs of a phantom (type 1) composed of synthetic polymer filled with water and another phantom (type 2) composed of human skull macerated with polymer coating were obtained with CdTe, CCD, and CMOS detectors. Dosimeters placed on the type 2 phantom were used to measure radiation. Noise levels from each image were also measured. McNamara cephalometric analysis was conducted, the dentoskeletal configurations were assessed, and a subjective evaluation of image quality was conducted. Parametric data were compared via 1-way analysis of variance with the Tukey post-hoc test, with a significance level of 5%. Subjective image quality and dentoskeletal configuration were described qualitatively. Results: A statistically significant difference was found among the images obtained with the 3 detectors (P<0.05), with the lowest noise level observed among the images obtained with the CdTe detector and a higher subjective preference demonstrated for those images. For the cephalometric analyses, no significant difference (P>0.05) was observed, and perfect agreement was seen with regard to the classifications obtained from the images acquired using the 3 detectors. The radiation dose associated with the CMOS detector was higher than the doses associated with the CCD (P < 0.05) and CdTe detectors (P < 0.05). Conclusion: Considering the evaluated parameters, the CdTe detector is recommended for use in clinical practice.en
dc.description.affiliationUniv Estadual Campinas, Piracicaba Dent Sch, Dept Oral Diag, Div Oral Radiol, Piracicaba, SP, Brazil
dc.description.affiliationSao Paulo State Univ, Sao Jose Dos Campos Dent Sch, Dept Diag & Surg, Sao Jose Dos Campos, SP, Brazil
dc.description.affiliationUnespSao Paulo State Univ, Sao Jose Dos Campos Dent Sch, Dept Diag & Surg, Sao Jose Dos Campos, SP, Brazil
dc.description.sponsorshipCoordination of Improvement of Higher Education Personnel, Brazil
dc.description.sponsorshipIdCoordination of Improvement of Higher Education Personnel, Brazil: 001
dc.format.extent339-346
dc.identifierhttp://dx.doi.org/10.5624/isd.2020.50.4.339
dc.identifier.citationImaging Science In Dentistry. Seoul: Korean Acad Oral & Maxillofacial Radiology, v. 50, n. 4, p. 339-346, 2020.
dc.identifier.doi10.5624/isd.2020.50.4.339
dc.identifier.issn2233-7822
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11449/209832
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000603390800010
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherKorean Acad Oral & Maxillofacial Radiology
dc.relation.ispartofImaging Science In Dentistry
dc.sourceWeb of Science
dc.subjectNoise
dc.subjectDiagnosis
dc.subjectCephalometry
dc.titleCharacteristics of radiographic images acquired with CdTe, CCD and CMOS detectors in skull radiographyen
dc.typeArtigo
dcterms.rightsHolderKorean Acad Oral & Maxillofacial Radiology
dspace.entity.typePublication
unesp.author.orcid0000-0001-7324-7838[1]
unesp.author.orcid0000-0002-0884-2443[2]
unesp.campusUniversidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP), Instituto de Ciência e Tecnologia, São José dos Campospt
unesp.departmentDiagnóstico e Cirurgia - ICTpt

Arquivos