Logotipo do repositório
 

Publicação:
Influence of calibration protocols afor a pressure-sensing walkway on akinetic and temporospatial aparameters

dc.contributor.authorAgostinho, F. S. [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorRahal, Sheila C. [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorGeraldo, B. [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorJustolin, P. L.T. [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorTeixeira, C. R. [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorLins, F. L.M.L.
dc.contributor.authorMonteiro, F. O.B.
dc.contributor.institutionUniversidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)
dc.contributor.institutionUniversidade Federal Rural da Amazônia, Instituto de Saúde e Produção Animal
dc.date.accessioned2018-12-11T16:56:55Z
dc.date.available2018-12-11T16:56:55Z
dc.date.issued2015-01-01
dc.description.abstractObjectives: To evaluate the influence on the kinetic and temporospatial parameters of calibration protocols with point and step techniques for a pressure-sensing walkway. Methods: Nine Labrador dogs were used. Two protocols of point calibration technique (C1 and C2) and eight protocols of step calibration technique (C3 to C10) were performed. In C1, weight was added to a stool to match the body mass of each dog. In C2, weight was added to the stool to match a 46.1 kg person. The other eight calibration protocols represented combinations of the following factors: 46.1 kg and 96.1 kg persons, barefoot or wearing sneakers, and stepping onto the platform with one or two feet. Results: The calibration protocols did not affect the temporospatial variables or percentages of body weight (%BW) distribution. Significant differences were found in both PVI (peak vertical force) and VI (vertical impulse) between barefoot versus wearing sneakers, 46.1 kg versus 96.1 kg person, and stepping onto the platform with one foot versus two feet. When comparing C1 with other protocols, significant differences were observed in PVF and VI for both forelimbs and hindlimbs. When comparing C2 with other protocols, significant differences were observed in PVF and VI for both forelimbs and hindlimbs in all protocols. Clinical significance: The PVF and VI were influenced by the calibration protocol used, but the %BW distribution and temporospatial parameters were not. Using the same calibration protocol for all dogs within the same group eliminated the variability of the kinetic data caused by the calibration.en
dc.description.affiliationDepartment of Veterinary Surgery and Anesthesiology, School of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Science, Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
dc.description.affiliationUniversidade Federal Rural da Amazônia, Instituto de Saúde e Produção Animal
dc.description.affiliationUnespDepartment of Veterinary Surgery and Anesthesiology, School of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Science, Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
dc.format.extent25-29
dc.identifier.citationVeterinary and Comparative Orthopaedics and Traumatology, v. 28, n. 1, p. 25-29, 2015.
dc.identifier.issn0932-0814
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-84921303407
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11449/171759
dc.language.isoeng
dc.relation.ispartofVeterinary and Comparative Orthopaedics and Traumatology
dc.relation.ispartofsjr0,726
dc.rights.accessRightsAcesso restrito
dc.sourceScopus
dc.subjectCalibration
dc.subjectPressure platform
dc.subjectTekscan
dc.titleInfluence of calibration protocols afor a pressure-sensing walkway on akinetic and temporospatial aparametersen
dc.typeArtigo
dspace.entity.typePublication
unesp.author.lattes8560913137958850[5]
unesp.author.orcid0000-0001-6639-037X[5]
unesp.campusUniversidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP), Faculdade de Medicina Veterinária e Zootecnia, Botucatupt
unesp.departmentCirurgia e Anestesiologia Veterinária - FMVZpt

Arquivos