Logotipo do repositório
 

Publicação:
Water as Veneering Modeling Liquid Affects Microhardness of Glassy Matrix Veneering Ceramic

dc.contributor.authorAmaral, Marina
dc.contributor.authorCampos, Tiago M. B.
dc.contributor.authorTakahashi, Talita
dc.contributor.authorMoura, Gabriely S. D.
dc.contributor.authorRamos, Gabriela F.
dc.contributor.authorMelo, Renata M. D. [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorOzcan, Mutlu
dc.contributor.institutionUniv Taubate
dc.contributor.institutionTechnol Inst Aeronaut
dc.contributor.institutionUniversidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
dc.contributor.institutionUniv Zurich
dc.date.accessioned2022-04-28T17:23:20Z
dc.date.available2022-04-28T17:23:20Z
dc.date.issued2022-03-14
dc.description.abstractPurpose/Aim: To evaluate the effect of different veneering liquids used for modeling on microhardness, fracture toughness and biaxial flexural strength of a glass-veneering ceramic. Material and methods: The manufacturer recommended modeling liquid (ML), distilled water 0140, isopropyl alcohol (IA), 0.5% (P05),1% (P7), and 2% (P2) polyethylene glycol solutions were mixed with feldspathic ceramic powder to form disc-shaped samples (n=20, 15 mm .1.2 mm). After sintering, samples were mirror-polished and subjected to Vickers indentation b=5) for measurement of microhardness and fracture toughness. The remaining 15 samples from each group were subjected to biaxial flexural strength. Data were subjected to one-way ANOVA and Weibull analysis. Results: The microhardness was affected by veneering liquid (p.0.002): OW promoted higher microhardness values than ML and IA. Fracture toughness 0=0.300 and flexural strength (p=0.930) were not affected by the veneering liquid but Weibull parameters were affected. All groups presented surface pores under high magnification. Conclusion: Even though the use of DW led to higher values of surface microhardness than the ML all obtained values are inside the range of enamel microhardness values reported in the literature. Such parameters may affect antagonist wear and should be reported in clinical trials.en
dc.description.affiliationUniv Taubate, Dept Dent, Rua Operarios n9, BR-12020340 Taubate, SP, Brazil
dc.description.affiliationTechnol Inst Aeronaut, Phys Dept, Praca Marechal Eduardo Gomes 50, BR-12228900 Sao Jose Dos Campos, Brazil
dc.description.affiliationSao Paulo State Univ, Dept Dent Mat & Prosthesis, Av Engn Francisco Jose Longo 777, BR-12245000 Sao Jose Dos Campos, Brazil
dc.description.affiliationUniv Zurich, Ctr Dent & Oral Med, Div Dent Biomat, Plattenstr 11, CH-8032 Zurich, Switzerland
dc.description.affiliationUnespSao Paulo State Univ, Dept Dent Mat & Prosthesis, Av Engn Francisco Jose Longo 777, BR-12245000 Sao Jose Dos Campos, Brazil
dc.format.extent5
dc.identifierhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1922/EJPRD_2374Amara105
dc.identifier.citationEuropean Journal Of Prosthodontics And Restorative Dentistry. Lowestoft: Dennis Barber Ltd, 5 p., 2022.
dc.identifier.doi10.1922/EJPRD_2374Amara105
dc.identifier.issn0965-7452
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11449/218842
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000770899900001
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherDennis Barber Ltd
dc.relation.ispartofEuropean Journal Of Prosthodontics And Restorative Dentistry
dc.sourceWeb of Science
dc.titleWater as Veneering Modeling Liquid Affects Microhardness of Glassy Matrix Veneering Ceramicen
dc.typeArtigo
dcterms.rightsHolderDennis Barber Ltd
dspace.entity.typePublication
unesp.campusUniversidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP), Instituto de Ciência e Tecnologia, São José dos Campospt
unesp.departmentMateriais Odontológicos e Prótese - ICTpt

Arquivos