Logotipo do repositório
 

Publicação:
Seasonal analysis of Klobuchar and NeQuick G single-frequency ionospheric models performance in 2018

dc.contributor.authorSetti Júnior, Paulo de Tarso [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorAquino, Marcio
dc.contributor.authorVeettil, Sreeja Vadakke
dc.contributor.authorAlves, Daniele Barroca Marra [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorSilva, Crislaine Menezes da [UNESP]
dc.contributor.institutionUniversidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)
dc.contributor.institutionUniversity of Nottingham
dc.date.accessioned2021-06-25T10:46:42Z
dc.date.available2021-06-25T10:46:42Z
dc.date.issued2020-01-01
dc.description.abstractFor single frequency positioning, the ionospheric effects can be minimized by using an ionospheric model, e.g., the Klobuchar or the NeQuick G. These models, respectively associated with the Global Positioning System (GPS) and Galileo systems, are based on a set of transmitted coefficients that describe the background ionospheric behavior and can be used to estimate the ionospheric delay at any time and location on the globe. We evaluate the accuracy and seasonal behavior of the Klobuchar and the NeQuick G models at different latitudes during the solar minimum year of 2018. Calibrated ionospheric Slant Total Electron Content (STEC) values from 33 MGEX (The Multi-GNSS Experiment) stations tracking GPS and Galileo satellites are used as a reference for comparison. The evaluation results show that, for low solar activity conditions (Winter Solstice), the Klobuchar model usually overestimates the ionospheric delay measured on the L1 frequency, with a mean bias of 0.93 m, and performs better than NeQuick G in regions and periods of high ionospheric activity (Spring and Autumn Equinoxes). NeQuick G usually underestimates the delay, with a mean bias of −0.14 m, performing better than Klobuchar in regions and periods of low ionospheric activity. Overall, Klobuchar and NeQuick G presented a modelling error RMS of 1.54 m and 1.19 m respectively.en
dc.description.affiliationSão Paulo State University (UNESP) School of Technology and Sciences, Presidente Prudente - Roberto Simonsen, 305
dc.description.affiliationNottingham Geospatial Institute University of Nottingham, Triumph Road
dc.description.affiliationUnespSão Paulo State University (UNESP) School of Technology and Sciences, Presidente Prudente - Roberto Simonsen, 305
dc.identifierhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.asr.2020.11.013
dc.identifier.citationAdvances in Space Research.
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.asr.2020.11.013
dc.identifier.issn1879-1948
dc.identifier.issn0273-1177
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85097480941
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11449/206956
dc.language.isoeng
dc.relation.ispartofAdvances in Space Research
dc.sourceScopus
dc.subjectCalibrated STEC
dc.subjectIonospheric models
dc.subjectKlobuchar
dc.subjectNeQuick G
dc.titleSeasonal analysis of Klobuchar and NeQuick G single-frequency ionospheric models performance in 2018en
dc.typeArtigo
dspace.entity.typePublication
unesp.departmentEstatística - FCTpt

Arquivos