Effect of Probiotic and β-Mannanase Supplementation on the Productive Performance and Intestinal Health of Broiler Chickens Challenged by Eimeria maxima and Clostridium perfringens
| dc.contributor.author | Maria, Larissa Pereira [UNESP] | |
| dc.contributor.author | Lizana, Rony Riveros [UNESP] | |
| dc.contributor.author | Camargos, Rosiane de Souza [UNESP] | |
| dc.contributor.author | Leme, Bruno Balbino [UNESP] | |
| dc.contributor.author | Marçal, Bárbara Vitória [UNESP] | |
| dc.contributor.author | Sakomura, Nilva Kazue [UNESP] | |
| dc.contributor.author | Kipper, Marcos | |
| dc.contributor.institution | Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) | |
| dc.contributor.institution | Elanco Animal Health | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2025-04-29T18:57:09Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2024-09-01 | |
| dc.description.abstract | The use of antibiotics in poultry farming has been associated with bacterial resistance in humans, leading to a ban on their inclusion in chicken diets. Therefore, the objective was to evaluate the effects of probiotics and β-mannanase on the growth performance and intestinal health of broiler chickens challenged by Eimeria maxima and Clostridium perfringens. For this, 2100 one-day-old male Ross 308 chicks were used. The treatments were as follows: T1—Negative control (NC) unchallenged birds; T2—Positive control (PC) challenged with E. maxima + C. perfringens; T3—PC + Antibiotic (Enramycin 8%-125 g/ton); T4—PC + β-mannanase (HemicellHT; 300 g/ton); T5—PC + probiotic (ProtexinTM; 150 g/ton); T6—PC + β-mannanase + probiotic. Significant differences (p < 0.05) were observed from 1 to 42 days in the variables body weight, body weight gain and feed intake, and the NC treatment presented higher values compared to the PC and PC + probiotic groups. The villus/crypt ratio in the duodenum increased in the PC + β-man + prob treatment, differing from the NC, PC and PC + probiotic (p < 0.05) treatments. The use of β-mannanase, probiotics or both together is effective to mitigate the effects of production challenges, through the maintenance of the intestine by modulating action on the cecum microbiome and intestinal morphometry. | en |
| dc.description.affiliation | Faculdade de Ciências Agrárias e Veterinárias São Paulo State University (Unesp), São Paulo | |
| dc.description.affiliation | Elanco Animal Health, São Paulo | |
| dc.description.affiliationUnesp | Faculdade de Ciências Agrárias e Veterinárias São Paulo State University (Unesp), São Paulo | |
| dc.format.extent | 239-266 | |
| dc.identifier | http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/poultry3030019 | |
| dc.identifier.citation | Poultry, v. 3, n. 3, p. 239-266, 2024. | |
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.3390/poultry3030019 | |
| dc.identifier.issn | 2674-1164 | |
| dc.identifier.scopus | 2-s2.0-85205045072 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/11449/301071 | |
| dc.language.iso | eng | |
| dc.relation.ispartof | Poultry | |
| dc.source | Scopus | |
| dc.subject | coccidiosis | |
| dc.subject | intestinal permeability | |
| dc.subject | natural alternative | |
| dc.subject | necrotic enteritis | |
| dc.title | Effect of Probiotic and β-Mannanase Supplementation on the Productive Performance and Intestinal Health of Broiler Chickens Challenged by Eimeria maxima and Clostridium perfringens | en |
| dc.type | Artigo | pt |
| dspace.entity.type | Publication | |
| relation.isOrgUnitOfPublication | 3d807254-e442-45e5-a80b-0f6bf3a26e48 | |
| relation.isOrgUnitOfPublication.latestForDiscovery | 3d807254-e442-45e5-a80b-0f6bf3a26e48 | |
| unesp.author.orcid | 0000-0003-4708-3459[1] | |
| unesp.author.orcid | 0000-0001-5641-3793[3] | |
| unesp.author.orcid | 0000-0002-1644-1973[4] | |
| unesp.author.orcid | 0000-0001-5707-4113[6] | |
| unesp.author.orcid | 0000-0001-6306-339X[7] | |
| unesp.campus | Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP), Faculdade de Ciências Agrárias e Veterinárias, Jaboticabal | pt |
