Logo do repositório

Effect of Probiotic and β-Mannanase Supplementation on the Productive Performance and Intestinal Health of Broiler Chickens Challenged by Eimeria maxima and Clostridium perfringens

dc.contributor.authorMaria, Larissa Pereira [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorLizana, Rony Riveros [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorCamargos, Rosiane de Souza [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorLeme, Bruno Balbino [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorMarçal, Bárbara Vitória [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorSakomura, Nilva Kazue [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorKipper, Marcos
dc.contributor.institutionUniversidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
dc.contributor.institutionElanco Animal Health
dc.date.accessioned2025-04-29T18:57:09Z
dc.date.issued2024-09-01
dc.description.abstractThe use of antibiotics in poultry farming has been associated with bacterial resistance in humans, leading to a ban on their inclusion in chicken diets. Therefore, the objective was to evaluate the effects of probiotics and β-mannanase on the growth performance and intestinal health of broiler chickens challenged by Eimeria maxima and Clostridium perfringens. For this, 2100 one-day-old male Ross 308 chicks were used. The treatments were as follows: T1—Negative control (NC) unchallenged birds; T2—Positive control (PC) challenged with E. maxima + C. perfringens; T3—PC + Antibiotic (Enramycin 8%-125 g/ton); T4—PC + β-mannanase (HemicellHT; 300 g/ton); T5—PC + probiotic (ProtexinTM; 150 g/ton); T6—PC + β-mannanase + probiotic. Significant differences (p < 0.05) were observed from 1 to 42 days in the variables body weight, body weight gain and feed intake, and the NC treatment presented higher values compared to the PC and PC + probiotic groups. The villus/crypt ratio in the duodenum increased in the PC + β-man + prob treatment, differing from the NC, PC and PC + probiotic (p < 0.05) treatments. The use of β-mannanase, probiotics or both together is effective to mitigate the effects of production challenges, through the maintenance of the intestine by modulating action on the cecum microbiome and intestinal morphometry.en
dc.description.affiliationFaculdade de Ciências Agrárias e Veterinárias São Paulo State University (Unesp), São Paulo
dc.description.affiliationElanco Animal Health, São Paulo
dc.description.affiliationUnespFaculdade de Ciências Agrárias e Veterinárias São Paulo State University (Unesp), São Paulo
dc.format.extent239-266
dc.identifierhttp://dx.doi.org/10.3390/poultry3030019
dc.identifier.citationPoultry, v. 3, n. 3, p. 239-266, 2024.
dc.identifier.doi10.3390/poultry3030019
dc.identifier.issn2674-1164
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85205045072
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11449/301071
dc.language.isoeng
dc.relation.ispartofPoultry
dc.sourceScopus
dc.subjectcoccidiosis
dc.subjectintestinal permeability
dc.subjectnatural alternative
dc.subjectnecrotic enteritis
dc.titleEffect of Probiotic and β-Mannanase Supplementation on the Productive Performance and Intestinal Health of Broiler Chickens Challenged by Eimeria maxima and Clostridium perfringensen
dc.typeArtigopt
dspace.entity.typePublication
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublication3d807254-e442-45e5-a80b-0f6bf3a26e48
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublication.latestForDiscovery3d807254-e442-45e5-a80b-0f6bf3a26e48
unesp.author.orcid0000-0003-4708-3459[1]
unesp.author.orcid0000-0001-5641-3793[3]
unesp.author.orcid0000-0002-1644-1973[4]
unesp.author.orcid0000-0001-5707-4113[6]
unesp.author.orcid0000-0001-6306-339X[7]
unesp.campusUniversidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP), Faculdade de Ciências Agrárias e Veterinárias, Jaboticabalpt

Arquivos