Logotipo do repositório

Comparison between two radiometric calibration methods applied to UAV multispectral images

dc.contributor.authorPorto, L. R. [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorImai, N. N. [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorBerveglieri, A. [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorMiyoshi, G. T. [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorMoriya, E. A.S. [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorTommaselli, A. M.G. [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorHonkavaara, E.
dc.contributor.editorClaudia Notarnicola, Fabio Bovenga, Lorenzo Bruzzone, Francesca Bovolo, Jon Atli Benediktsson, Emanuele Santi, Nazzareno Pierdicca
dc.contributor.institutionUniversidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)
dc.contributor.institutionFinnish Geodetic Inst.
dc.date.accessioned2021-06-25T10:37:21Z
dc.date.available2021-06-25T10:37:21Z
dc.date.issued2020-01-01
dc.description.abstractThere are many advantages of using unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) in remote sensing but when using radiometrically corrected multispectral images. This study focuses on two techniques of obtain a multispectral orthomosaic with suitable radiometric quality considering a day period with minor variations in illumination and clouds. The first technique comprises a radiometric block adjustment combined with empirical line whilst the second technique uses only empirical line. Field measurements with spectrometers were used to assess the techniques. The obtained results show that the radiometric block adjustment presented better results when compared to the radiometric reference targets and its calculated Hemispherical Conical Reflectance Factor (HCRF) from the spectrometer. However, the root mean square error (RMSE), normalized root mean square error (NRMSE) and mean absolute percentage error (MAPE) were similar in both cases, showing that the two proposed workflows can generate multispectral mosaics with acceptable radiometric quality for a period in which illumination conditions are stable. Images difference between each band was produced showing that there was a stronger variation of pixels in the higher slope region, which indicates that additional corrections beyond empirical line are needed in these situations.en
dc.description.affiliationPost Graduate Program in Cartographic Science São Paulo State University (UNESP)
dc.description.affiliationDept. of Cartography São Paulo State University (UNESP)
dc.description.affiliationFinnish Geodetic Inst.
dc.description.affiliationUnespPost Graduate Program in Cartographic Science São Paulo State University (UNESP)
dc.description.affiliationUnespDept. of Cartography São Paulo State University (UNESP)
dc.identifierhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1117/12.2579346
dc.identifier.citationProceedings of SPIE - The International Society for Optical Engineering, v. 11533.
dc.identifier.dimensionspub.1131449588
dc.identifier.doi10.1117/12.2579346
dc.identifier.isbn9781510638792
dc.identifier.isbn9781510638808
dc.identifier.issn1996-756X
dc.identifier.issn0277-786X
dc.identifier.orcid0000-0002-8571-1383
dc.identifier.orcid0000-0003-0483-1103
dc.identifier.orcid0000-0003-0516-0567
dc.identifier.orcid0000-0001-5429-1593
dc.identifier.orcid0000-0002-7236-2145
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85093974489
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11449/206737
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherSPIE, the international society for optics and photonics
dc.relation.ispartofProceedings of SPIE - The International Society for Optical Engineering
dc.rights.accessRightsAcesso restritopt
dc.rights.sourceRightsclosed
dc.sourceScopus
dc.sourceDimensions
dc.subjectEmpirical line
dc.subjectImage processing
dc.subjectMosaic generation
dc.subjectMultispectral images
dc.subjectRadiometric block adjustment
dc.subjectUnmanned aerial vehicles - UAV
dc.titleComparison between two radiometric calibration methods applied to UAV multispectral imagesen
dc.typeTrabalho apresentado em eventopt
dspace.entity.typePublication
unesp.departmentCartografia - FCTpt

Arquivos