Publicação: In Vitro Comparison of Microleakage, Marginal Fit, and Cement Thickness of Conventional and Prepless Lithium Disilicate Veneers
Carregando...
Data
Orientador
Coorientador
Pós-graduação
Curso de graduação
Título da Revista
ISSN da Revista
Título de Volume
Editor
Quintessence Publishing Co Inc
Tipo
Artigo
Direito de acesso
Resumo
Purpose: To assess the influence of two preparation techniques on the microleakage, marginal fit, and cement thickness of lithium disilicate veneers. Materials and Methods: A total of 24 human maxillary central incisors were divided randomly into two groups according to preparation technique (n = 12 each): a minimally invasive preparation with a butt-joint design (0.3-mm depth) and a chamfer finish line (group MP); and no preparation (group NP). All teeth were restored with lithium disilicate veneers cemented with photopolymerizable resin cement. Specimens were aged thermally (6,000 cycles of 5 degrees C to 55 degrees C) and mechanically (100,000 cycles at 100 N, 4 Hz). Specimens were immersed in fuchsin dye for 24 hours using a standard dye penetration technique, then sectioned and evaluated under a stereomicroscope (x20 magnification). Data were analyzed by ANOVA and Kruskal-Wallis tests (P < .05). Results: There was significant microleakage (P = .0163) at the cervical area compared to the proximal area. The marginal fit was similar, with no statistical difference (P = .212) between groups MP (153 +/- 81 pm) and NP (111 +/- 74 pm). Group MP showed a significantly (P= .006) reduced cement thickness at the cervical area (87 +/- 27 pm) compared to group NP (210 +/- 89 pm). Conclusion: Although the preparation technique was shown to influence the cement thickness, it did not show any influence on microleakage or marginal fit. Intl Prosthodont 2023;36:63-70. doi: 10.11607/ijp.7616
Descrição
Palavras-chave
Idioma
Inglês
Como citar
International Journal of Prosthodontics. Hanover Park: Quintessence Publishing Co Inc, v. 36, n. 1, p. 63-70, 2023.
