Logotipo do repositório
 

Publicação:
“Pingado Dilemma”: Is formal contract sweet enough?

dc.contributor.authorWatanabe, Kassia
dc.contributor.authorBánkuti, Sandra Schiavi
dc.contributor.authorLourenzani, Ana Elisa [UNESP]
dc.contributor.institutionEnvironmental and Agrarian Science
dc.contributor.institutionState University of Maringa
dc.contributor.institutionUniversidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)
dc.date.accessioned2018-12-11T16:48:07Z
dc.date.available2018-12-11T16:48:07Z
dc.date.issued2017-08-01
dc.description.abstract“Pingado” is a Brazilian beverage similar to cappuccino, macchiato. For a good “pingado”, coffee and milk should be of good quality. The formal institutions ensure the minimum attributes of quality for coffee and for milk in Brazil. However, in order to reach consumer desirable quality attributes for a differentiated “pingado” the transactions between farmers and agroindustry in quality-driven systems is likely to be conducted with hybrid forms. Thus, “Pingado Dilemma” involves the interactions between private and public institutions affect the combination of formal and informal governance mechanisms in transactions, in both chains, and involve complexities in terms of obligations to do and obligations to give in contract farming. This paper aims at analyzing the contract farming and the role of public and private institutions in transactions between farmers and agroindustry in Brazilian high-quality dairy and coffee chains. The research design used in this study is a case study based on multiple cases. The results indicate that while in dairy chain the private institutions reinforce public requirements (formal institutions), for the coffee sector, the role of private institutions is to establish and guarantee a new level of quality and differentiation. Interactions between private and public institutions affect the combination of formal and informal governance mechanisms in transactions, in both chains, and involve complexities in terms of obligations to do and obligations to give in contract farming.en
dc.description.affiliationFederal University of Reconcavo da Bahia Center of Biological Environmental and Agrarian Science, Rua Rui Barbosa, 710 - Centro
dc.description.affiliationState University of Maringa Department of Administration, Av. Colombo, 5790, Jd. Universitário
dc.description.affiliationSão Paulo State University (UNESP) School of Sciences and Engineering
dc.description.affiliationUnespSão Paulo State University (UNESP) School of Sciences and Engineering
dc.description.sponsorshipCoordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior (CAPES)
dc.description.sponsorshipConselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (CNPq)
dc.description.sponsorshipIdCNPq: 409099/2013-9
dc.format.extent126-137
dc.identifierhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2017.06.001
dc.identifier.citationJournal of Rural Studies, v. 54, p. 126-137.
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.jrurstud.2017.06.001
dc.identifier.file2-s2.0-85022075733.pdf
dc.identifier.issn0743-0167
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85022075733
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11449/169904
dc.language.isoeng
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of Rural Studies
dc.relation.ispartofsjr1,113
dc.rights.accessRightsAcesso abertopt
dc.sourceScopus
dc.subjectCoffee
dc.subjectContract farming
dc.subjectInstitutions
dc.subjectMilk
dc.title“Pingado Dilemma”: Is formal contract sweet enough?en
dc.typeArtigopt
dspace.entity.typePublication
unesp.author.lattes600958492722839[3]
unesp.author.orcid0000-0002-3285-1243[2]
unesp.author.orcid0000-0001-8420-4120[3]
unesp.campusUniversidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP), Faculdade de Ciências e Engenharia, Tupãpt

Arquivos

Pacote Original

Agora exibindo 1 - 1 de 1
Carregando...
Imagem de Miniatura
Nome:
2-s2.0-85022075733.pdf
Tamanho:
696.96 KB
Formato:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Descrição: