Logotipo do repositório
 

Publicação:
Productive performance and ingestive behavior of crossbred heifers in integrated livestock-forest systems

dc.contributor.authorde Freitas Santos, Juliana Mara [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorAndrighetto, Cristiana [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorMateus, Gustavo Pavan
dc.contributor.authorLupatini, Gelci Carlos [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorDaldon, Murilo Scalet [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorde Lima, Larissa Pereira [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorda Luz, Patrícia Aparecida [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorBello, Hornblenda Joaquina Silva [UNESP]
dc.contributor.institutionUniversidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
dc.contributor.institutionAgência Paulista de Tecnologia dos Agronegócios
dc.date.accessioned2022-05-01T15:46:15Z
dc.date.available2022-05-01T15:46:15Z
dc.date.issued2022-01-01
dc.description.abstractThe present study aimed to assess the productive performance,ingestive behavior,and thermal condition of crossbred beef heifers in an integrated livestock-forest (ILF) system with different tree-planting designs. Seventy-two ½ Angus ½ Nellore heifers were divided in three treatments–conventional system (CS) without eucalyptus,integrated livestock system with 187 eucalyptus ha−1 (ILF-1L),and integrated livestock system with 446 eucalyptus ha−1 (ILF-3L)–,in the winter and summer. Total dry mass of forage (TDM),chemical analysis of Marandu palisadegrass,average daily gain (ADG),stocking rate (SR),weight gain per area (WGA),behavior,microclimatic variables,and thermal comfort indexes were evaluated. A higher percentage of crude protein and lower TDM and SR were observed in ILF-1L and ILF-3L,with no differences for ADG and WGA. Ambient temperature,temperature-humidity index,black globe-humidity index,and radiant heat load were better in ILF-1L and ILF-3L. Heifers in ILF-1L and ILF-3L carried out grazing,resting,rumination,and other activities in the shade. In the summer,heifers in ILF-1L and ILF-3L spent less time resting and more time in rumination and performing other activities than those in the CS. In conclusion,the better forage quality in ILF-1L and ILF-3L does not alter the performance of heifers or WGA,despite the decreased TDM and SR. Furthermore,ILF-1L and ILF-3L provide better thermal comfort,and heifers that do not have access to shade decrease their activities as a strategy to reduce the use of energy for thermal regulation process.en
dc.description.affiliationUniversidade Estadual Paulista Faculdade de Ciências Agrárias e Tecnológicas, SP
dc.description.affiliationAgência Paulista de Tecnologia dos Agronegócios, SP
dc.description.affiliationUnespUniversidade Estadual Paulista Faculdade de Ciências Agrárias e Tecnológicas, SP
dc.description.sponsorshipCoordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior (CAPES)
dc.description.sponsorshipIdCAPES: 2017/05944-8,2019/20039-5
dc.identifierhttp://dx.doi.org/10.37496/rbz5120210047
dc.identifier.citationRevista Brasileira de Zootecnia, v. 51.
dc.identifier.doi10.37496/rbz5120210047
dc.identifier.issn1806-9290
dc.identifier.issn1516-3598
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85126715262
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11449/234294
dc.language.isoeng
dc.relation.ispartofRevista Brasileira de Zootecnia
dc.sourceScopus
dc.subjectAnimal welfare
dc.subjectSilvopastoral system
dc.subjectThermal comfort
dc.titleProductive performance and ingestive behavior of crossbred heifers in integrated livestock-forest systemsen
dc.typeArtigo
dspace.entity.typePublication
unesp.author.orcid0000-0002-1996-5078[1]
unesp.author.orcid0000-0001-6543-9696[2]
unesp.author.orcid0000-0001-7620-1026[3]
unesp.author.orcid0000-0002-2390-2571[4]
unesp.author.orcid0000-0002-7934-4804[5]
unesp.author.orcid0000-0002-1871-4031[6]
unesp.author.orcid0000-0002-3323-5274[7]
unesp.author.orcid0000-0003-2250-8633[8]
unesp.departmentZootecnia - FCATpt

Arquivos