50 anos da UNESP
Logo do repositório

Sem título

Página do item simplificado
dc.contributor.authorChagas, Thales Quintão
dc.contributor.authorFreitas, Ítalo Nascimento
dc.contributor.authorMontalvão, Mateus Flores
dc.contributor.authorNóbrega, Rafael Henrique [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorMachado, Monica Rodrigues Ferreira
dc.contributor.authorCharlie-Silva, Ives
dc.contributor.authorAraújo, Amanda Pereira da Costa
dc.contributor.authorGuimarães, Abraão Tiago Batista
dc.contributor.authorAlvarez, Tenilce Gabriela da Silva
dc.contributor.authorMalafaia, Guilherme
dc.contributor.institutionGoiano Federal University
dc.contributor.institutionGoiano Federal Institute
dc.contributor.institutionUniversidade Federal de Uberlândia (UFU)
dc.contributor.institutionUniversidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
dc.contributor.institutionFederal University of Jataí
dc.contributor.institutionUniversidade de São Paulo (USP)
dc.contributor.institutionUniversidade Federal de Goiás (UFG)
dc.date.accessioned2025-04-29T20:05:46Z
dc.date.issued2024-01-01
dc.description.abstractDear Editor, After publishing this article (https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2021.130279), we noticed some mistakes related to the citation of figures throughout the paper and the change of title and caption between the figures. Due to the continuous reference to the image results in the text of the article, this mistake makes the text difficult to read. Additionally, some minor errors in author affiliations were identified. Thus, the authors regret: 1. In the affiliation “a,” where it says “Post-Graduation Program in Cerrado Natural Resources Conservation, Goiano Federal University, Urutaí Campus, Urutaí, Brazil,” the correct one is “Post-Graduation Program in Cerrado Natural Resources Conservation, Goiano Federal Institute, Urutaí Campus, Urutaí, Brazil”.2. In the affiliation “b,” where it says, “Biological Research Laboratory, Goiano Federal Institute, Urutaí Campus, Urutaí, Brazil,” the correct one is “Laboratory of Toxicology Applied to the Environment, Goiano Federal Institute, Urutaí Campus, Urutaí, Brazil”.3. In the “corresponding author,” where it says “Post-Graduation Program in Cerrado Natural Resources Conservation, Goiano Federal University, Urutaí Campus, Urutaí, Brazil,” the correct one is “Post-Graduation Program in Cerrado Natural Resources Conservation, Goiano Federal Institute, Urutaí Campus, Urutaí, Brazil”.4. In the section “2.3.3. Pigmentation and biometrics”, where it says “(…) was measured to determine the height and length of their heads, caudal peduncle and back height and total length (Fig. 4E)”, the correct one is “(…) was measured to determine the height and length of their heads, caudal peduncle and back height and total length (Fig. 2E)”.5. In section “3. Results”:a. where it says “(…) in parameters “distance covered” and “mean swimming speed” between groups in the open field test (Fig. 3A–B, respectively)”, the correct one is “(…) in parameters “distance covered” and “mean swimming speed” between groups in the open field test (Fig. 4A–B, respectively)”.b. where it says “(…) having anxiogenic or anxiolytic effects caused by PLA BioMPs (Fig. 3C)”, the correct one is “(…) having anxiogenic or anxiolytic effects caused by PLA BioMPs (Fig. 4C)”.c. where it says “(…) and in shoal cohesion inferred by CSs (Fig. 4A–B)”, the correct one is “and in shoal cohesion inferred by CSs (Fig. 5A–B)”.d. where it says “(…) which aimed at evaluating parameters “distance to the surface” and “shoal cohesion” (Fig. 5A–B)”, the correct one is “(…) which aimed at evaluating parameters “distance to the surface” and “shoal cohesion” (Fig. 6A–B)”.e. where it says “(…) PLA BioMPs (without concentration-response effect) (Fig. 5C). On the other hand, there was no difference in frequency of interaction with the mirror between groups (Fig. 5D)”, the correct one is “(…) PLA BioMPs (without concentration-response effect) (Fig. 6C). On the other hand, there was no difference in frequency of interaction with the mirror between groups (Fig. 6D).f. where it says,en
dc.description.affiliationCerrado Natural Resources Conservation Goiano Federal University, Urutaí Campus, Urutaí
dc.description.affiliationBiological Research Laboratory Goiano Federal Institute, Urutaí Campus, Urutaí
dc.description.affiliationEcology and Natural Resources Conservation Federal University of Uberlândia
dc.description.affiliationReproductive and Molecular Biology Group Morphology Department São Paulo State University
dc.description.affiliationDepartment of Biological Sciences Zebrafish Research and Reproduction Laboratory (LABFISH) Federal University of Jataí
dc.description.affiliationDepartment of Pharmacology Institute of Biomedical Sciences University of São Paulo
dc.description.affiliationBiotechnology and Biodiversity Federal University of Goiás
dc.description.affiliationUnespReproductive and Molecular Biology Group Morphology Department São Paulo State University
dc.identifierhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2023.140508
dc.identifier.citationChemosphere, v. 346.
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.chemosphere.2023.140508
dc.identifier.issn1879-1298
dc.identifier.issn0045-6535
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85178523307
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11449/306264
dc.language.isoeng
dc.relation.ispartofChemosphere
dc.sourceScopus
dc.title.alternativeCorrigendum to ‘Multiple endpoints of polylactic acid biomicroplastic toxicity in adult zebrafish (Danio rerio)’ [Chemosphere, 277 (2021), 130279](S0045653521007487)(10.1016/j.chemosphere.2021.130279)en
dc.typeErratapt
dspace.entity.typePublication

Arquivos

Coleções

Artigos