Logo do repositório

The effect of pretreatment choice on cellulosic ethanol production from sugarcane straw: An insight into environmental impact profile and GHG emissions mitigation potential in Brazil

dc.contributor.authorNogueira, Guilherme Pessoa [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorHernandes, Thayse Aparecida Dourado
dc.contributor.authorPetrielli, Gabriel Palma
dc.contributor.authorChagas, Mateus Ferreira
dc.contributor.authorJunqueira, Tassia Lopes [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorMcManus, Marcelle
dc.contributor.authorLeak, David
dc.contributor.authorFranco, Telma Teixeira
dc.contributor.authorDias, Marina Oliveira de Souza
dc.contributor.authorCavaliero, Carla Kazue Nakao [UNESP]
dc.contributor.institutionBrazilian Center for Research in Energy and Materials (CNPEM)
dc.contributor.institutionUniversidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
dc.contributor.institutionUniversity of Bath
dc.contributor.institutionUniversidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP)
dc.contributor.institutionUniversidade de São Paulo (USP)
dc.date.accessioned2025-04-29T20:04:17Z
dc.date.issued2023-08-01
dc.description.abstractThe exploration of residual lignocellulosic biomass for biofuel production is crucial to achieve significant greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions mitigation within the following decades, translating to diminished agricultural environmental impact and land-use change dynamics. On the other hand, cellulosic ethanol production pathways are typically resource-intensive, in energy and chemical terms, which directly influence its carbon intensity. Pretreatment choice, to this end, is key, since it dictates the overall process performance and yield, and may include crucial flows, under the life-cycle perspective, such as solvents and other chemicals. This work, then, aims to evaluate the effect of pretreatment choice, namely hydrothermal (HT), steam explosion (SE), and alkaline (AK), in the technical and environmental performance of cellulosic ethanol production from sugarcane straw (SCS), extending this analysis to the final GHG emissions mitigation potential for gasoline and fossil-generated electricity substitution, under the Brazilian context in São Paulo. Results show that, while AK provided the highest ethanol yield, this pretreatment option gave the lowest electricity generation surplus, and its sodium hydroxide usage was identified as an important environmental hotspot in most impact categories, which narrowed down its GHG emission mitigation gap for gasoline substitution. HT and SE presented similar ethanol and electricity yields, with SE being the most balanced option in terms of productivity and environmental impact profile. By selecting the SE route, all of the available SCS in São Paulo could be converted into 10% of the Brazilian annual ethanol production, and mitigate 5.4 MtCO2e of gasoline emissions, 15% of the Brazilian Biofuel Policy (RenovaBio) target for 2022.en
dc.description.affiliationBrazilian Biorenewables National Laboratory (LNBR) Brazilian Center for Research in Energy and Materials (CNPEM), SP
dc.description.affiliationInterinstitutional Graduate Program in Bioenergy (USP/UNICAMP/UNESP) University of Campinas, SP
dc.description.affiliationCentre for Sustainable and Circular Technologies (CSCT) University of Bath, Claverton Down
dc.description.affiliationDepartment of Biology and Biochemistry University of Bath
dc.description.affiliationLaboratory of Biochemical Engineering Biorefining and Products of Renewable Origin (LEBBPOR) Chemical Engineering School University of Campinas, SP
dc.description.affiliationInstitute of Science and Technology Federal University of São Paulo (ICT/UNIFESP), SP
dc.description.affiliationGraduate Program in Energy Systems Planning Faculty of Mechanical Engineering University of Campinas, SP
dc.description.affiliationUnespInterinstitutional Graduate Program in Bioenergy (USP/UNICAMP/UNESP) University of Campinas, SP
dc.description.sponsorshipCoordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior (CAPES)
dc.description.sponsorshipFundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo (FAPESP)
dc.description.sponsorshipIdFAPESP: #2015/50612-8
dc.description.sponsorshipIdFAPESP: #2018/20173-0
dc.description.sponsorshipIdFAPESP: #2019/10439-6
dc.identifierhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.biombioe.2023.106895
dc.identifier.citationBiomass and Bioenergy, v. 175.
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.biombioe.2023.106895
dc.identifier.issn1873-2909
dc.identifier.issn0961-9534
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85164269237
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11449/305820
dc.language.isoeng
dc.relation.ispartofBiomass and Bioenergy
dc.sourceScopus
dc.subjectBiorefinery design and simulation
dc.subjectCellulosic ethanol
dc.subjectLife cycle assessment
dc.subjectPretreatment
dc.subjectSugarcane straw
dc.titleThe effect of pretreatment choice on cellulosic ethanol production from sugarcane straw: An insight into environmental impact profile and GHG emissions mitigation potential in Brazilen
dc.typeArtigopt
dspace.entity.typePublication
unesp.author.orcid0000-0001-6423-1279 0000-0001-6423-1279[1]
unesp.author.orcid0000-0001-9108-7751 0000-0001-9108-7751[5]

Arquivos

Coleções