Publicação: Multi-step adhesive cementation versus one-step adhesive cementation: Push-out bond strength between fiber post and root dentin before and after mechanical cycling
dc.contributor.author | Amaral, Marina [UNESP] | |
dc.contributor.author | Rippe, Marilia Pivetta [UNESP] | |
dc.contributor.author | Bergoli, Cesar Dalmolin [UNESP] | |
dc.contributor.author | Monaco, Carlo | |
dc.contributor.author | Valandro, Luiz Felipe | |
dc.contributor.institution | Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) | |
dc.contributor.institution | Federal University of Santa Maria | |
dc.contributor.institution | University of Bologna | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2022-04-28T18:57:13Z | |
dc.date.available | 2022-04-28T18:57:13Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2011-09-01 | |
dc.description.abstract | This study evaluated the effects of mechanical cycling on resin push-out bond strength to root dentin, using two strategies for fiber post cementation. Forty bovine roots were embedded in acrylic resin after root canal preparation using a custom drill of the fiber post system. The fiber posts were cemented into root canals using two different strategies (N = 20): a conventional adhesive approach using a three-step etch-and-rinse adhesive system combined with a conventional resin cement (ScotchBond Multi Purpose Plus + RelyX ARC), or a simplified adhesive approach using a self-adhesive resin cement (RelyX U100). The core was built up with composite resin and half of the specimens from each cementation strategy were submitted to mechanical cycling (45 degree angle; 37°C; 88 N; 4 Hz; 700,000 cycles). Each specimen was cross-sectioned and the disk specimens were pushed-out. The means from every group (n = 10) were statistically analyzed using a two-way ANOVA and a Tukey test (P = 0.05). The cementation strategy affected the push-out results (P < 0.001), while mechanical cycling did not (P = 0.3716). The simplified approach (a self-adhesive resin cement) had better bond performance despite the conditioning. The self-adhesive resin cement appears to be a good option for post cementation. Further trials are needed to confirm these results. | en |
dc.description.affiliation | Paulo Sao State University (UNESP), Sao Jose dos Campos | |
dc.description.affiliation | Federal University of Santa Maria, Santa Maria | |
dc.description.affiliation | Division of Prosthodontics Department of Oral Science, Alma Mater Studiorum University of Bologna | |
dc.description.affiliationUnesp | Paulo Sao State University (UNESP), Sao Jose dos Campos | |
dc.identifier.citation | General Dentistry, v. 59, n. 5, 2011. | |
dc.identifier.issn | 0363-6771 | |
dc.identifier.scopus | 2-s2.0-80053346975 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/11449/219724 | |
dc.language.iso | eng | |
dc.relation.ispartof | General Dentistry | |
dc.source | Scopus | |
dc.title | Multi-step adhesive cementation versus one-step adhesive cementation: Push-out bond strength between fiber post and root dentin before and after mechanical cycling | en |
dc.type | Artigo | pt |
dspace.entity.type | Publication | |
unesp.campus | Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP), Instituto de Ciência e Tecnologia, São José dos Campos | pt |