Logotipo do repositório
 

Publicação:
beta-TCP/HA with or without enamel matrix proteins for maxillary sinus floor augmentation: a histomorphometric analysis of human biopsies

dc.contributor.authorNery, James Carlos
dc.contributor.authorViolin Dias Pereira, Luis Antonio
dc.contributor.authorGuimaraes, George Furtado
dc.contributor.authorScardueli, Cassio Rocha [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorGomes Franca, Fabiana Mantovani
dc.contributor.authorSpin-Neto, Rubens
dc.contributor.authorStavropoulos, Andreas
dc.contributor.institutionSao Leopoldo Mand Res Ctr
dc.contributor.institutionUniversidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP)
dc.contributor.institutionUniversidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)
dc.contributor.institutionAarhus Univ
dc.contributor.institutionMalmo Univ
dc.contributor.institutionImplant Ctr
dc.date.accessioned2018-11-26T17:31:23Z
dc.date.available2018-11-26T17:31:23Z
dc.date.issued2017-05-04
dc.description.abstractBackground: It is still unclear whether enamel matrix proteins (EMD) as adjunct to bone grafting enhance bone healing. This study compared histomorphometrically maxillary sinus floor augmentation (MSFA) with beta-TCP/HA in combination with or without EMD in humans. Methods: In ten systemically healthy patients needing bilateral MSFA, one side was randomly treated using beta-TCP/HA mixed with EMD (BC + EMD) and the other side using only beta-TCP/HA (BC). After 6 months, biopsies were harvested from grafted areas during implant installation, being histologically and histomorphometrically analyzed. Differences between the groups considering new bone formation, soft tissues, and remaining BC were statistically evaluated. Results: All patients showed uneventful healing after MSFA, and dental implant installation was possible in all patients after 6 months. Histological analysis showed newly formed bone that was primarily woven in nature; it was organized in thin trabeculae, and it was occasionally in contact with residual bone substitute particles, which appeared in various forms and sizes and in advanced stage of degradation. Mean bone area was 43.4% (CI95 38.9; 47.8) for the BC group and 43.0% (CI95 36.6; 49.5) for the BC + EMD group. Mean soft tissue area was 21.3% (CI95 16.5; 26.2) for BC group and 21.5% (CI95 17.7; 25.3) for BC + EMD group, while the remaining biomaterial was 35.3% (CI95 36.6; 49.5) and 35.5% (CI95 29.6; 41.3) for BC and BC + EMD group, respectively. Conclusions: MSFA with BC resulted in adequate amounts of new bone formation allowing successful implant installation; adding EMD did not have a significant effect.en
dc.description.affiliationSao Leopoldo Mand Res Ctr, Dept Implantol, Brasilia, DF, Brazil
dc.description.affiliationUNICAMP State Univ Campinas, Dept Biochem & Tissue Biol, Inst Biol, Sao Paulo, Brazil
dc.description.affiliationUNESP Univ Estadual Paulista, Araraquara Dent Sch, Dept Periodontol, Sao Paulo, Brazil
dc.description.affiliationAarhus Univ, Dept Dent & Oral Hlth Oral Radiol, Aarhus, Denmark
dc.description.affiliationMalmo Univ, Dept Periodontol, Fac Odontol, Malmo, Sweden
dc.description.affiliationImplant Ctr, Lotes CD, SEPS 710-910,Off 226, BR-70390108 Brasilia, DF, Brazil
dc.description.affiliationUnespUNESP Univ Estadual Paulista, Araraquara Dent Sch, Dept Periodontol, Sao Paulo, Brazil
dc.format.extent7
dc.identifierhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40729-017-0080-8
dc.identifier.citationInternational Journal Of Implant Dentistry. Tokyo: Springer Japan Kk, v. 3, 7 p., 2017.
dc.identifier.doi10.1186/s40729-017-0080-8
dc.identifier.fileWOS000401294600001.pdf
dc.identifier.issn2198-4034
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11449/162788
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000401294600001
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherSpringer
dc.relation.ispartofInternational Journal Of Implant Dentistry
dc.rights.accessRightsAcesso aberto
dc.sourceWeb of Science
dc.subjectBone substitute
dc.subjectMaxillary sinus floor
dc.subjectEnamel matrix proteins
dc.subjectHistomorphometry
dc.subjectHuman
dc.titlebeta-TCP/HA with or without enamel matrix proteins for maxillary sinus floor augmentation: a histomorphometric analysis of human biopsiesen
dc.typeArtigo
dcterms.licensehttp://www.springer.com/open+access/authors+rights?SGWID=0-176704-12-683201-0
dcterms.rightsHolderSpringer
dspace.entity.typePublication
unesp.campusUniversidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP), Faculdade de Odontologia, Araraquarapt
unesp.departmentDiagnóstico e Cirurgia - FOARpt

Arquivos

Pacote Original

Agora exibindo 1 - 1 de 1
Carregando...
Imagem de Miniatura
Nome:
WOS000401294600001.pdf
Tamanho:
2.92 MB
Formato:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Descrição: