Under pressure: suitable areas for neotropical cats within an under protected biodiversity hotspot
| dc.contributor.author | Ribeiro-Souza, Paula [UNESP] | |
| dc.contributor.author | Haji, Júlio [UNESP] | |
| dc.contributor.author | Oshima, Júlia [UNESP] | |
| dc.contributor.author | Lima, Fernando [UNESP] | |
| dc.contributor.author | Lima-Silva, Barbara | |
| dc.contributor.author | Pires, José | |
| dc.contributor.author | Ribeiro, Milton [UNESP] | |
| dc.contributor.author | Graipel, Maurício | |
| dc.contributor.institution | Universidade Federal de São Carlos (UFSCar) | |
| dc.contributor.institution | Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC) | |
| dc.contributor.institution | Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) | |
| dc.contributor.institution | Universidade de São Paulo (USP) | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2025-04-29T19:28:40Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2024-04-01 | |
| dc.description.abstract | Understand which factors influence the distribution of feline species can contribute to better planning of conservation strategies in a biodiversity hotspot. We modeled the potential distribution of seven cat species occurring in the Atlantic Forest (AF). Here, we combined climatic and landscape perspectives to determine the most suitable areas considering the taxonomic richness of these cats. We also assessed the ability of fully protected areas (FPAS) to protect these cat species. The results indicated that only 30% of the AF remnants are suitable for all species. Areas with low species richness were located in Argentina and northeastern Brazil. For taxonomic richness, the Serra do Mar (45.89%) and the Araucaria (27.90%) sub-regions had the highest suitable areas, followed by the Interior sub-region (21.89%). The Brejos Nordestinos and Pernambuco sub-regions had less than 1% suitability. Considering taxonomic richness, only 9% of suitable areas are covered by FPAs. Leopardus emiliae (1.37%) and Panthera onca (1.97%) had the lowest values of suitable areas covered by FPAs. The other species of cats are also under low protection (L. guttulus = 5.38%, L. wiedii = 5.71%, Herpailurus yagouaroundi = 6.70%, L. pardalis = 3.85%, and Puma concolor = 4.94%). We reveal that a low percentage of suitable areas are currently fully protected. This study also provides important conservation measures to be implemented in different AF sub-regions. These findings may help in the planning, maintenance, and implementation of FPAs through restoration programs and the establishment of ecological corridors. | en |
| dc.description.affiliation | Programa de Pós Graduação em Ecologia e Recursos Naturais Centro de Ciências Biológicas e da Saúde Universidade Federal de São Carlos (UFSCar), SP | |
| dc.description.affiliation | Fauna Floripa Project Departamento de Ecologia Centro de Ciências Biológicas Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina, SC | |
| dc.description.affiliation | Spatial Ecology and Conservation Laboratory (LEEC) Programa de Pós Graduação em Ecologia Evolução e Biodiversidade Departamento de Biodiversidade Instituto de Biociências Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP), SP | |
| dc.description.affiliation | Laboratório de Ecologia do Movimento Instituto de Biociências Departamento de Ecologia Universidade de São Paulo (USP), SP | |
| dc.description.affiliation | Laboratório de Ecologia e Conservação (LAEC) Departamento de Biologia Faculdade de Filosofia Ciências e Letras de Ribeirão Preto Universidade de São Paulo (USP), Ribeirão Preto, SP | |
| dc.description.affiliation | Centro de Estudos Ambientais (CEA) Instituto de Biociências Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP), SP | |
| dc.description.affiliationUnesp | Spatial Ecology and Conservation Laboratory (LEEC) Programa de Pós Graduação em Ecologia Evolução e Biodiversidade Departamento de Biodiversidade Instituto de Biociências Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP), SP | |
| dc.description.affiliationUnesp | Centro de Estudos Ambientais (CEA) Instituto de Biociências Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP), SP | |
| dc.identifier | http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.rsase.2024.101155 | |
| dc.identifier.citation | Remote Sensing Applications: Society and Environment, v. 34. | |
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.1016/j.rsase.2024.101155 | |
| dc.identifier.issn | 2352-9385 | |
| dc.identifier.scopus | 2-s2.0-85186733523 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/11449/303123 | |
| dc.language.iso | eng | |
| dc.relation.ispartof | Remote Sensing Applications: Society and Environment | |
| dc.source | Scopus | |
| dc.subject | Atlantic forest | |
| dc.subject | Biodiversity conservation | |
| dc.subject | Habitat loss | |
| dc.subject | Species distribution model | |
| dc.subject | Species richness | |
| dc.title | Under pressure: suitable areas for neotropical cats within an under protected biodiversity hotspot | en |
| dc.type | Artigo | pt |
| dspace.entity.type | Publication | |
| unesp.author.orcid | 0000-0002-2629-3417 0000-0002-2629-3417 0000-0002-2629-3417[1] | |
| unesp.author.orcid | 0000-0002-3141-9619[2] | |
| unesp.author.orcid | 0000-0003-1545-768X 0000-0003-1545-768X[3] | |
| unesp.author.orcid | 0000-0002-8644-9647[4] | |
| unesp.author.orcid | 0000-0003-0380-3194 0000-0003-0380-3194[5] | |
| unesp.author.orcid | 0000-0001-5059-1919[8] | |
| unesp.campus | Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP), Centro de Estudos Ambientais, Rio Claro | pt |

