Logo do repositório

Under pressure: suitable areas for neotropical cats within an under protected biodiversity hotspot

dc.contributor.authorRibeiro-Souza, Paula [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorHaji, Júlio [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorOshima, Júlia [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorLima, Fernando [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorLima-Silva, Barbara
dc.contributor.authorPires, José
dc.contributor.authorRibeiro, Milton [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorGraipel, Maurício
dc.contributor.institutionUniversidade Federal de São Carlos (UFSCar)
dc.contributor.institutionUniversidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC)
dc.contributor.institutionUniversidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
dc.contributor.institutionUniversidade de São Paulo (USP)
dc.date.accessioned2025-04-29T19:28:40Z
dc.date.issued2024-04-01
dc.description.abstractUnderstand which factors influence the distribution of feline species can contribute to better planning of conservation strategies in a biodiversity hotspot. We modeled the potential distribution of seven cat species occurring in the Atlantic Forest (AF). Here, we combined climatic and landscape perspectives to determine the most suitable areas considering the taxonomic richness of these cats. We also assessed the ability of fully protected areas (FPAS) to protect these cat species. The results indicated that only 30% of the AF remnants are suitable for all species. Areas with low species richness were located in Argentina and northeastern Brazil. For taxonomic richness, the Serra do Mar (45.89%) and the Araucaria (27.90%) sub-regions had the highest suitable areas, followed by the Interior sub-region (21.89%). The Brejos Nordestinos and Pernambuco sub-regions had less than 1% suitability. Considering taxonomic richness, only 9% of suitable areas are covered by FPAs. Leopardus emiliae (1.37%) and Panthera onca (1.97%) had the lowest values of suitable areas covered by FPAs. The other species of cats are also under low protection (L. guttulus = 5.38%, L. wiedii = 5.71%, Herpailurus yagouaroundi = 6.70%, L. pardalis = 3.85%, and Puma concolor = 4.94%). We reveal that a low percentage of suitable areas are currently fully protected. This study also provides important conservation measures to be implemented in different AF sub-regions. These findings may help in the planning, maintenance, and implementation of FPAs through restoration programs and the establishment of ecological corridors.en
dc.description.affiliationPrograma de Pós Graduação em Ecologia e Recursos Naturais Centro de Ciências Biológicas e da Saúde Universidade Federal de São Carlos (UFSCar), SP
dc.description.affiliationFauna Floripa Project Departamento de Ecologia Centro de Ciências Biológicas Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina, SC
dc.description.affiliationSpatial Ecology and Conservation Laboratory (LEEC) Programa de Pós Graduação em Ecologia Evolução e Biodiversidade Departamento de Biodiversidade Instituto de Biociências Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP), SP
dc.description.affiliationLaboratório de Ecologia do Movimento Instituto de Biociências Departamento de Ecologia Universidade de São Paulo (USP), SP
dc.description.affiliationLaboratório de Ecologia e Conservação (LAEC) Departamento de Biologia Faculdade de Filosofia Ciências e Letras de Ribeirão Preto Universidade de São Paulo (USP), Ribeirão Preto, SP
dc.description.affiliationCentro de Estudos Ambientais (CEA) Instituto de Biociências Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP), SP
dc.description.affiliationUnespSpatial Ecology and Conservation Laboratory (LEEC) Programa de Pós Graduação em Ecologia Evolução e Biodiversidade Departamento de Biodiversidade Instituto de Biociências Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP), SP
dc.description.affiliationUnespCentro de Estudos Ambientais (CEA) Instituto de Biociências Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP), SP
dc.identifierhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.rsase.2024.101155
dc.identifier.citationRemote Sensing Applications: Society and Environment, v. 34.
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.rsase.2024.101155
dc.identifier.issn2352-9385
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85186733523
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11449/303123
dc.language.isoeng
dc.relation.ispartofRemote Sensing Applications: Society and Environment
dc.sourceScopus
dc.subjectAtlantic forest
dc.subjectBiodiversity conservation
dc.subjectHabitat loss
dc.subjectSpecies distribution model
dc.subjectSpecies richness
dc.titleUnder pressure: suitable areas for neotropical cats within an under protected biodiversity hotspoten
dc.typeArtigopt
dspace.entity.typePublication
unesp.author.orcid0000-0002-2629-3417 0000-0002-2629-3417 0000-0002-2629-3417[1]
unesp.author.orcid0000-0002-3141-9619[2]
unesp.author.orcid0000-0003-1545-768X 0000-0003-1545-768X[3]
unesp.author.orcid0000-0002-8644-9647[4]
unesp.author.orcid0000-0003-0380-3194 0000-0003-0380-3194[5]
unesp.author.orcid0000-0001-5059-1919[8]
unesp.campusUniversidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP), Centro de Estudos Ambientais, Rio Claropt

Arquivos