Logo do repositório

Muscle Function and Thickness Are Not Associated with Responsiveness to Post-Activation Performance Enhancement

dc.contributor.authorFontanetti, Gabriel [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorBarreto, Renan Vieira [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorJunior, Rubens Correa [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorMantovani, Guilherme Beneduzzi [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorDenadai, Benedito Sérgio [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorGreco, Camila Coelho [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorLima, Leonardo Coelho Rabello de [UNESP]
dc.contributor.institutionUniversidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
dc.contributor.institutionUniversidade de São Paulo (USP)
dc.date.accessioned2025-04-29T20:14:49Z
dc.date.issued2023-07-01
dc.description.abstractThere is great variability in responsiveness to post-activation performance enhancement (PAPE). Factors such as greater expression of type II muscle fibers and experience with strength training are associated with greater responsiveness to PAPE. We investigated whether there is an association between markers of muscular function and morphology and responsiveness to PAPE in untrained individuals. Sixty-six active men (22 ± 2 years, 74 ± 11 kg, and 172 ± 27 cm) participated in the study. Their countermovement jump (CMJ) heights were measured before and four minutes after a pre-activation protocol consisting of five squats with a 5RM load. Isometric knee extensor peak torque (IPT), CMJ power (POCON), and thickness of the vastus lateralis muscle (VLMT) of the participants were also determined in an unpotentiated condition. Change in CMJ height (ΔCMJ) following the pre-activation protocol was calculated and its associations with baseline CMJ height (CMJCON), POCON, IPT, and VLMT were tested. Linear stepwise multiple regression models were also applied to screen for predictors of ΔCMJ among the dependent variables. No significant change (p = 0.28) in CMJ height was observed after the PA protocol (pre: 30.8 ± 5.1 cm; post: 31.0 ± 5.5 cm). No significant associations (p > 0.05) were found between ΔCMJ and IPT, VLMT, POCON, and CMJCON (r = 0.29, 0.18, 0.09, and 0.01, respectively). Linear stepwise multiple regression analyses did not result in any significant models for ΔCMJ prediction. Although we confirmed the high individual variability in response to PA, no associations between neuromuscular performance/morphology and responsiveness to PAPE were found.en
dc.description.affiliationHuman Performance Laboratory Department of Physical Education Institute of Biosciences São Paulo State University
dc.description.affiliationSchool of Physical Education and Sport of Ribeirão Preto University of São Paulo
dc.description.affiliationUnespHuman Performance Laboratory Department of Physical Education Institute of Biosciences São Paulo State University
dc.identifierhttp://dx.doi.org/10.3390/app13137520
dc.identifier.citationApplied Sciences (Switzerland), v. 13, n. 13, 2023.
dc.identifier.doi10.3390/app13137520
dc.identifier.issn2076-3417
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85164839249
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11449/309224
dc.language.isoeng
dc.relation.ispartofApplied Sciences (Switzerland)
dc.sourceScopus
dc.subjectcountermovement jump
dc.subjecthuman performance
dc.subjectjump performance
dc.subjectmuscle power
dc.subjectpost-activation performance enhancement
dc.subjectstrength
dc.titleMuscle Function and Thickness Are Not Associated with Responsiveness to Post-Activation Performance Enhancementen
dc.typeArtigopt
dspace.entity.typePublication
relation.isAuthorOfPublication07246534-fcb4-44bb-bbd2-beb9a7a47d65
relation.isAuthorOfPublication.latestForDiscovery07246534-fcb4-44bb-bbd2-beb9a7a47d65
unesp.author.orcid0000-0003-2734-4359[2]
unesp.author.orcid0000-0002-2154-685X[4]
unesp.author.orcid0000-0003-4118-534X[7]

Arquivos

Coleções